QueenofBattle (talk | contribs) →Disambiguation link notification for September 9: Nuclear Option |
→Arbitration Enforcement Notice: new section |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Hi. I really don’t think we need to get into an edit war over this. I have edited the bit about the nuclear option being used to confirm Brett Kavanaugh. While it’s true that the Republican applied the nuclear option to SCOTUS nominees, first Gorsuch and then Kavanaugh, the text didn’t represent a [[WP:NPOV]] as the Democrats were the first to apply it to presidential nominees in general and made it available to the Republican majority to apply universally. The link to the nuclear option page clearly lays out the sequencing. Thanks. [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle|talk]]) 19:49, 7 October 2018 (UTC) |
Hi. I really don’t think we need to get into an edit war over this. I have edited the bit about the nuclear option being used to confirm Brett Kavanaugh. While it’s true that the Republican applied the nuclear option to SCOTUS nominees, first Gorsuch and then Kavanaugh, the text didn’t represent a [[WP:NPOV]] as the Democrats were the first to apply it to presidential nominees in general and made it available to the Republican majority to apply universally. The link to the nuclear option page clearly lays out the sequencing. Thanks. [[User:QueenofBattle|QueenofBattle]] ([[User talk:QueenofBattle|talk]]) 19:49, 7 October 2018 (UTC) |
||
== Arbitration Enforcement Notice == |
|||
I have filed a request for Arbitration Enforcement based on your recent edits regarding American Politics. You can find the thread at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Soibangla]]. [[User:power~enwiki|power~enwiki]] ([[User talk:Power~enwiki|<span style="color:#FA0;font-family:courier">π</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/Power~enwiki|<span style="font-family:courier">ν</span>]]) 00:15, 15 October 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:15, 15 October 2018
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
To thank you for all the article improvement you do filling in bare references - like here. Way too often, little improvements to the encyclopedia like that don't get noticed or properly appreciated. MelanieN (talk) 18:16, 28 July 2018 (UTC) |
Trump Tower preparation meeting, IOW clear conspiracy
Good sources here that help to answer some questions: Why did they lie about this meeting so much? Why did Trump personally override the attempts by Trump Jr. and Kushner to be relatively honest about revealing this meeting. He literally trumped their attempt and issued a completely false press release. How could so many very key American and Russian people suddenly and by chance just happen to appear at a meeting in Trump Tower to discuss lifting sanctions without Trump knowing? Why has this meeting been considered the clearest evidence of collusion/conspiracy? This planning meeting makes it clear that none of this was by chance or happened without Trump's very close and personal involvement. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 09:13, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- BTW, the Committee to Investigate Russia is an excellent, non-partisan, fact-based source which cites many RS we can use. IMO, it should be considered a RS in itself as its Advisory Board is a group of very high profile and notable experts who are, in and of themselves, considered RS. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 09:13, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Trump vs. the rest of the world about Russian interference
Hours after White House warns of new election meddling, Trump again points to 'Russian hoax'
- "The two events created a split-screen effect: America's intelligence experts warning voters that Russia is trying to undermine democracy while Trump tells them it's all political chicanery."
- "Several of Trump’s top lieutenants...described the threat in the White House briefing room....But Trump, whose operation is under federal investigation for possible collusion with Russia and obstruction of justice, swiftly contradicted his advisers’ conclusion in the midst of thousands of boisterous supporters here.
"In Helsinki, I had a great meeting with Putin,"... Now we're being hindered by the Russian hoax. It's a hoax, OK? I'll tell you what, Russia's very unhappy that Trump won, that I can tell you."
"In Helsinki, Putin said that he had hoped Trump would win the 2016 presidential election."
BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 07:40, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 2
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Fox News (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to FOIA
- Judicial Watch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to FOIA
- The Gateway Pundit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to FOIA
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judicial Watch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FOIA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I really don’t think we need to get into an edit war over this. I have edited the bit about the nuclear option being used to confirm Brett Kavanaugh. While it’s true that the Republican applied the nuclear option to SCOTUS nominees, first Gorsuch and then Kavanaugh, the text didn’t represent a WP:NPOV as the Democrats were the first to apply it to presidential nominees in general and made it available to the Republican majority to apply universally. The link to the nuclear option page clearly lays out the sequencing. Thanks. QueenofBattle (talk) 19:49, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Arbitration Enforcement Notice
I have filed a request for Arbitration Enforcement based on your recent edits regarding American Politics. You can find the thread at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Soibangla. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:15, 15 October 2018 (UTC)