→Cenk Uygur political views: use article's talk page for content discussions |
→Apology: new section |
||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
:Would you be willing to give your opinion on what's happening now on [[Cenk Uygur]]'s talk page, as well as on {{u|wallyfromdilbert}}'s talk page between me and them? They and I are still going on about an issue that started between you and me and I was hoping you'd let us know where you stand. If not, no worries. [[User:Cacash refund|Cacash refund]] ([[User talk:Cacash refund|talk]]) 01:04, 10 January 2020 (UTC) |
:Would you be willing to give your opinion on what's happening now on [[Cenk Uygur]]'s talk page, as well as on {{u|wallyfromdilbert}}'s talk page between me and them? They and I are still going on about an issue that started between you and me and I was hoping you'd let us know where you stand. If not, no worries. [[User:Cacash refund|Cacash refund]] ([[User talk:Cacash refund|talk]]) 01:04, 10 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
::Please use the article's talk page rather than my talk page for discussions about article content. {{u|Cacash refund}}, the article's talk page allows discussions to be available to all interested editors. You should be responding to the comments there, rather than fragmenting the discussions across multiple talk pages and noticeboards. – [[User:Wallyfromdilbert|wallyfromdilbert]] ([[User talk:Wallyfromdilbert|talk]]) 01:14, 10 January 2020 (UTC) |
::Please use the article's talk page rather than my talk page for discussions about article content. {{u|Cacash refund}}, the article's talk page allows discussions to be available to all interested editors. You should be responding to the comments there, rather than fragmenting the discussions across multiple talk pages and noticeboards. – [[User:Wallyfromdilbert|wallyfromdilbert]] ([[User talk:Wallyfromdilbert|talk]]) 01:14, 10 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Apology == |
|||
Hi Slywriter, I would like to take the time to sincerely apologise for my comments at the [[School bus]] talkpage as well as for the edit summary,<br> |
|||
My heart was in the right place but I could've and should've been much calmer and a lot less confrontational - I simply felt like I wasn't being listened too and then to be told "Discuss it on the talkpage" was the icing on the cake for me,<br> |
|||
Regardless of that I shouldn't of said what I did on the talkpage and again sincerely apologise for my comments,<br> |
|||
I hope we can work together in the future and under much better circumstances too,<br> |
|||
I wish you all the very best and hope you enjoy editing here :),<br> |
|||
Take care, Thanks, Regards, –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color:blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color:orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color:navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 21:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC), |
Revision as of 21:00, 24 January 2020
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 15:07, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 11:30, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Slywriter! Thank you for your contributions. I am EdisonLin27 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! EdisonLin27 (Message Me! • 📜) 05:34, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 18:42, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Jim Zeigler
So, when my properly sourced citations are deleted, you don't blink an eye. But, when I try to delete properly sourced citations, you add them back immeadiately? Why the unfair double-standard? Belledoll (talk) 02:34, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Belledoll: I was not following the article prior to your edit, it appeared on a recent edit list and came across as improper.
- I will take a look at the article history but those edits were rejected by another editor.
- While we are on the topic... Do you work for or otherwise have a relationship with the person named in the article?
- Slywriter (talk) 02:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
No, I am simply a follower of state politics. Belledoll (talk) 02:46, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
@Belledoll: edits are not neutral. You can not add information or extraordinary claims. Only paraphrase what is in the article you are citing. Slywriter (talk) 02:51, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
President of the United States
Will you PLEASE respect WP:BRD & stop messing with the intro at President of the United States, until we can get a consensus for the changes you're proposing? Leave it as it was, before you raised your concerns. GoodDay (talk) 14:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Per policy, BRD is not mandatory and it does not explicitly require not making edits while the discussion is occurring. I have settled more than one debate by making an edit that is acceptable to all. You or another editor is free to revert. I will not edit war it in. Slywriter (talk) 14:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
- You're being disruptive by trying to force your changes into that article's intro. Please note the 1RR rule that covers that article, thus preventing anyone 'reverting' the exact same edit more then once, within 24 hrs. GoodDay (talk) 14:53, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Cenk Uygur political views
I posted on the Cenk Uygur talk page as well. My edit in the Political Views section doesn't violate any guidelines so there is no legitimate reason for it to be removed. Refer to WP:BLPSPS and WP:BLPREMOVE. I'm happy to go into dispute resolution on the topic. Cacash refund (talk) 01:52, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
- Would you be willing to give your opinion on what's happening now on Cenk Uygur's talk page, as well as on wallyfromdilbert's talk page between me and them? They and I are still going on about an issue that started between you and me and I was hoping you'd let us know where you stand. If not, no worries. Cacash refund (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
- Please use the article's talk page rather than my talk page for discussions about article content. Cacash refund, the article's talk page allows discussions to be available to all interested editors. You should be responding to the comments there, rather than fragmenting the discussions across multiple talk pages and noticeboards. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 01:14, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Apology
Hi Slywriter, I would like to take the time to sincerely apologise for my comments at the School bus talkpage as well as for the edit summary,
My heart was in the right place but I could've and should've been much calmer and a lot less confrontational - I simply felt like I wasn't being listened too and then to be told "Discuss it on the talkpage" was the icing on the cake for me,
Regardless of that I shouldn't of said what I did on the talkpage and again sincerely apologise for my comments,
I hope we can work together in the future and under much better circumstances too,
I wish you all the very best and hope you enjoy editing here :),
Take care, Thanks, Regards, –Davey2010Talk 21:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC),