→Overtime: reply |
Bankrupt305 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
:Hi [[User:Bankrupt305|Bankrupt305]], I am not an administrator, and therefore can't restore the article or see what it was like before it was deleted. At any rate, there is no reason to have separate articles about [[Zack Weiner]], [[Overtime (sports network)|Overtime]] and [[Overtime Elite]]. Weiner is notable only in reference to those companies, so my suggestion is to have the Overtime Elite and Zack Weiner articles be redirects to the Overtime article, and to recreate it in a neutral way. |
:Hi [[User:Bankrupt305|Bankrupt305]], I am not an administrator, and therefore can't restore the article or see what it was like before it was deleted. At any rate, there is no reason to have separate articles about [[Zack Weiner]], [[Overtime (sports network)|Overtime]] and [[Overtime Elite]]. Weiner is notable only in reference to those companies, so my suggestion is to have the Overtime Elite and Zack Weiner articles be redirects to the Overtime article, and to recreate it in a neutral way. |
||
:Might I ask what your connection to Overtime is? If you have a particularly close connection to a specific topic, it can be difficult to write from a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]. Also, if you're used to reading articles in the trade press, you might have habits of writing in a style that comes across as non-neutral and promotional in the context of Wikipedia. --[[User:Slashme|Slashme]] ([[User talk:Slashme#top|talk]]) 15:39, 5 January 2022 (UTC) |
:Might I ask what your connection to Overtime is? If you have a particularly close connection to a specific topic, it can be difficult to write from a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]. Also, if you're used to reading articles in the trade press, you might have habits of writing in a style that comes across as non-neutral and promotional in the context of Wikipedia. --[[User:Slashme|Slashme]] ([[User talk:Slashme#top|talk]]) 15:39, 5 January 2022 (UTC) |
||
Thanks for your response. I work for Overtime - however I didn't write the Overtime wikipedia page as it long predated my arrival and have no idea who did. I disagree on the points about Zack and Overtime being two separate pages. Being the co-founder of both a major sports brand and a sports league should provide enough notability to have their own page, no? [[User:Bankrupt305|Bankrupt305]] ([[User talk:Bankrupt305|talk]]) 16:13, 5 January 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:13, 5 January 2022
This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hepatic encephalopathy and Alzheimer type II astrocytes
Please, note that the pictures of "Alzheimer type II astrocytes" in Hepatic encephalopathy page are NOT Alzheimer type II astrocytes, these are neurons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Signamax (talk • contribs) 10:20, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Signamax, you should raise this issue at Talk:Hepatic encephalopathy. I didn't put that picture there and I don't know the topic at all. Pinging User:Doc James as somewhat recent editor of the page. --Slashme (talk) 13:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Person one should ping would be the expert who uploaded the images User:Nephron. While I am not a pathologist, they are... Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Overtime
Instead of deleting the Overtime Sports Network, which is a major US company, can you please restore and provide feedback as to where it is promotional? It does not make sense that Overtime and Overtime Elite, do not appear on wiki. Bankrupt305 (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Bankrupt305, I am not an administrator, and therefore can't restore the article or see what it was like before it was deleted. At any rate, there is no reason to have separate articles about Zack Weiner, Overtime and Overtime Elite. Weiner is notable only in reference to those companies, so my suggestion is to have the Overtime Elite and Zack Weiner articles be redirects to the Overtime article, and to recreate it in a neutral way.
- Might I ask what your connection to Overtime is? If you have a particularly close connection to a specific topic, it can be difficult to write from a neutral point of view. Also, if you're used to reading articles in the trade press, you might have habits of writing in a style that comes across as non-neutral and promotional in the context of Wikipedia. --Slashme (talk) 15:39, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for your response. I work for Overtime - however I didn't write the Overtime wikipedia page as it long predated my arrival and have no idea who did. I disagree on the points about Zack and Overtime being two separate pages. Being the co-founder of both a major sports brand and a sports league should provide enough notability to have their own page, no? Bankrupt305 (talk) 16:13, 5 January 2022 (UTC)