OneClickArchiver archived 1 discussion to User talk:Simonm223/Archive 7 |
|||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
:: Ok. My proposed edits were questions and reasoning why Citing left out from his proposed statement. After I am finished with [[Talk:2019 Canadian federal election|2019 Canada federal election]]'s talk page. I will write how it should be framed. [[User:Weelandlka|Weelandlka]] [[User talk:Weelandlka|talk]]) 05:05:13 17 September 2019 (UTC) |
:: Ok. My proposed edits were questions and reasoning why Citing left out from his proposed statement. After I am finished with [[Talk:2019 Canadian federal election|2019 Canada federal election]]'s talk page. I will write how it should be framed. [[User:Weelandlka|Weelandlka]] [[User talk:Weelandlka|talk]]) 05:05:13 17 September 2019 (UTC) |
||
::: I left a very clear request at article talk. No need to bother me here.[[User:Simonm223|Simonm223]] ([[User talk:Simonm223#top|talk]]) 21:56, 17 September 2019 (UTC) |
::: I left a very clear request at article talk. No need to bother me here.[[User:Simonm223|Simonm223]] ([[User talk:Simonm223#top|talk]]) 21:56, 17 September 2019 (UTC) |
||
== We may disagree but you are welcome to talk with me == |
|||
Simonm223, I know we disagree on the Ngo article but you are welcome to raise concerns with me directly. In order to see replies to my own comments on Masem's page I saw your comments about me.[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Masem#The_Ngo_problem]] Please always feel free to discuss concerns with me. I don't think your summary accurately reflects my POV but that may be a failure on my part to correctly express my concerns. Your levelheaded thinking related to the various firearms articles earned my respect and I'm happy to discuss even if we don't agree. [[User:Springee|Springee]] ([[User talk:Springee|talk]]) 13:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC) |
|||
BTW, my intent wasn't to just "walk away" rather the discussion with other members was getting too heated so I decided it was best to step back for a bit. [[User:Springee|Springee]] ([[User talk:Springee|talk]]) 13:48, 18 September 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:40, 18 September 2019
You've been lobstered!
Regarding this exchange, and because we haven't found any trout yet this year, I hereby whack you with this lobster. Fill yer boots, bud! Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:31, 25 July 2019 (UTC) |
- Pinchy and delicious. (And hey, Mr. Seafood is just down the block.) Simonm223 (talk) 19:37, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
- I've been meaning to tell you, it's MR (initials) Seafood, not Mister Seafood. I don't know what the MR is though. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:10, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
Thanks for the kind suggestions. Hope sweet pastry is your thing! :) Ltyl (talk) 16:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC) |
A cup of tea for you!
A cup of tea to go with you baklava. Thanks for your support in my recent, albeit unsuccessful, RfA. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:55, 27 August 2019 (UTC) |
Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death and Pinochet
Thank you for your commentary on Talk:Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death, I think that really help clarifiying the issue. Now its more clear to me what kind of sources would be needed to make a clear case. Maybe these sources exist, but I won't bring up this topic in a time. I understand rules needs to be harsh on conspiracy theories or else it would be very exposed to promotion.
Regarding the Pinochet article I am unhappy with the first part of "Ideology and public image", it seem to me a collection of straw remarks with no good prose that unifies into a readable narrative. I have myself contributed to it, having added plenty of material in that section but not found any easy way to merge it all into a good text. I also think that if the section is going include selected opinions there should be some sympathetic ones also. Given that you seem interested in the topic but have a different approach on editing I will comment in the talk page before making further changes. Dentren | Talk 18:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- With a contentious historical figure like Pinochet, it's always best to discuss first and edit later. This is especially significant considering how he's lionized currently in certain sectors of the far-right. Giving an accurate neutral and scholarly historical account of the dictator is especially relevant. Simonm223 (talk) 18:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
AP2 notices
Thank you for doing that, Shouldn't Springee get one as well, as they have been the prime mover in attempting to keep the information out of the article? Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- They got one in Nov 2018 so no. I would get in trouble if I gave them another. Simonm223 (talk) 22:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Got it, thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:38, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Important message
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- OK. But like, IP, look up, waaaaaaaaaay up at the top of this User Talk page. I'm quite aware of these arbcom sanctions. Simonm223 (talk) 14:14, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Bernier
Ok, I will fix my edit on Bernier's talk page. However I am kind of busy dealing with the 2019 Canada federal election's talk page. An IP editor added a bunch of conversation and my concern is that they are based on partisanship? Feel free to add your opinion into the federal election talk page.Weelandlka (talk) 19:12:03 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- Just clearly explain your proposed edit. That is all. Simonm223 (talk) 20:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- Ok. My proposed edits were questions and reasoning why Citing left out from his proposed statement. After I am finished with 2019 Canada federal election's talk page. I will write how it should be framed. Weelandlka talk) 05:05:13 17 September 2019 (UTC)