SigmaEpsilon (talk | contribs) →[[Heroes (TV series)]]: rm harassment |
Scrubs broadcasters |
||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
) |
) |
||
== Scrubs broadcasters == |
|||
Hi, as an editor regularly involved in the editing of scrubs related articles, would you please be willing to give yours views on the discussion over the list of scrubs broadcasters, see here [[Talk:Scrubs (TV series)#Removal of International Broadcasters section]], thank you--[[User:Jac16888|Jac16888]] 19:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:22, 26 July 2007
This is my talk page. Not much to say yet.
Hello, world.
About Wikipedia
Signature
You can copy someone else's signature, and then experiment with changing it on the "preferences" page (using the sandbox is the best way) — see Wikipedia:Signature. The Greek characters (without diacritics) are available on the ordinary editing page (down at the bottom, under the "save page"/"show preview" buttons; for other character sets you can use HTML Unicode; have a look at meta:Help:Special characters. I hope that this helps. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:47, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Re: Edit counter
Thanks for the heads up. I haven't checked my edit count in a while. I found this tool that works very well. You also mentioned that you're not sure how to link it in your signature. You can view my signature template here if it's something you're interested in. Thanks again! Jtrost (T | C | #) 15:15, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, SigmaEpsilon! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Ale_Jrbtalk 21:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Broken link
Thanks - I appreciate you catching the broken link to the edit counter. I've repaired it. Cheers! --Ckatzchatspy 20:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Episode Naming Conventions
Courtesy note about ArbCom proceeding
Hiya, sorry to bother you, but I wanted to drop you a courtesy note to let you know about a current ArbCom proceeding where your name is briefly mentioned. If you are not familiar with ArbCom, please do not be alarmed. In real-world terms, this is sort of like stating that your name is being mentioned as one of the witnesses (or possibly even bystanders) to a case. ArbCom cases tend to be somewhat large and chaotic, but if you would like to watch the proceedings, you may wish to set Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Naming Conventions on your watchlist. Your own name is probably somewhere on the evidence page, or possibly at the workshop page. The case is currently in an "evidence-gathering" phase and has not yet reached the state of actual comment by arbitrators yet. My guess is it'll probably run for another month or so before a decision is finalized.
No action is needed on your part, this is just a courtesy note. If you would like to participate in the case though, you are more than welcome. You may wish to offer a statement with your view of events at the case's talkpage, or you can add evidence or participate in the workshop. Many editors routinely participate in ArbCom proceedings regardless of whether or not they are directly involved in the case, since ArbCom rulings are considered "binding" and may have ramifications in other parts of Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, let me know, or feel free to post at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Naming Conventions. Best, Elonka 05:37, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Requesting comments for Lost episodes
Requesting comments for Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lost/Episode guidelines#Name suffix - a debate over the use of disambiguation titles for episode articles of a TV show when no disambiguation is needed. Any input you wish to give would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. -- Ned Scott 21:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
Glad I could reword it to make everyone happier. I would be careful though about labeling something vandalism. Try to assume good faith of other editors. There is a Wikipedia policy somewhere about this, though I'm not willing ot look it up. Thanks for spotlighting the original edit though! Rkevins82 - TALK 22:25, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Stargate Template
Isn't the whole point of the template to make it so any stargate page can acess any other stargate page? Why not put it on every page then? Plus, some other guy atached it to the tech template. Tobyk777 05:53, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
Alright
It's ok, I just don't like to be accused of things that I didn't do. If I had done it then I wouldn't have a problem with accepting my mistake. Granted, I should have paid a bit more attention to what it said originally, I probably would have made the same changes you did. I was only seeing the capitals altered to lowercase. Bignole 22:47, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Concerning Motifs and Mythos in Lost
Hello. Since there are already two seperate pages Mythology of Lost and Thematic motifs of Lost, it is redunant to have the combined article. I was wondering if you'd be willing to add a {{db-author}} tag to the Motifs and Mythos in Lost article per the discussion on the Lost talk page. This would be the easiest way to delete it. Thanks. -- Wikipedical 04:17, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Betty Boop
I was erroniously accused of POV edits to Betty Boop. I considered deleting this comment, but decided to keep it for the sake of the "historical accuracy" of my talkpage. The user later apologized, and I consider the matter resolved.
- There is no evidence that Betty was specifically Jewish and so your 'fictional Jews' link could be seen as being a little misleading. Please see the Betty Boop discussion page for more information on this. Thanks--Edchilvers 21:55, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Seven Minutes to Midnight
Sorry to revert back from you deletion of the Heroes episode description, but this was NBC's description of the episode, not speculation. True, some of it appears to describe earlier events, but we can't be sure yet that they won't be retold or revisted in this episode. Primogen 23:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Five Years Gone
Can I get your help at the page so i don't get in trouble for 3 reverts. Billywhack 02:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
JD scrubs cite
sorry, didn't know that, have changed it now--Jac16888 19:02, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Concerning 23 (numerology)
Not Contrived
You might be surprised to find out that neither example is contrived. They both come out of number theory. happy number and birthday paradox are both legitimate terms. Now placing the number of letters in happy in front of the 6, may have been a bit of discordian numerology, but I suspect I was practicing discordianism before you were born. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RDates (talk • contribs) 22:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC).
Can't Count
The 60's were rough...sometimes counting is difficult. Enjoy college, have a good life, have fun, and don't get too messed up.Richard Dates 14:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello there! Seeing as you edit a lot of Lost pages, I was wondering if you would support or comment on my nomiation for Paulo (Lost). Thanks, thedemonhog talk • edits • count 17:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Justin, Scrubs minor characters
hi would you be willing to comment on the Talk page for List of minor characters of Scrubs regarding your opinion on the toy unicorn Justin thanks--Jac16888 18:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
SVG table
Thanks, I appreciate it. I think the real problem is with the thumbnail generation from SVGs. It seems to work only 3/4 of the time or so. Once there's a bad thumbnail it seems to stick around forever (though sometimes cache purging works). So switching the thumbnail sizes is probably what did it, but I appreciate having the gallery working! — brighterorange (talk) 15:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey SigmaEpsilon, I just nominated List of Lost episodes for Featured List status again and was hoping you could support or comment on the nomination at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Lost episodes. Thanks. -- Wikipedical 07:22, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Yo
It's me, Drake. The problem with the SC articles is that they're all written in-universe and have little to no real-world info. And until someone removes most of the in-universe and provide more out-of-universe, they're still in the line of fire. AMIB is a tough man to please - if you find a way, please tell me, I've been trying for a year. The Clawed One 03:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- I read your response, and trust me, you couldn't be more wrong. If anything, the removal you did isn't enough. We need to drastically cut down on the in-universe info, a lot less of it, and you idea would either mean a lot more, or a bunch of stubs. The Clawed One 04:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Also, game guides aren't allowed, so little, preferably no gameplay info, if possible. The Clawed One 04:05, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
)
Scrubs broadcasters
Hi, as an editor regularly involved in the editing of scrubs related articles, would you please be willing to give yours views on the discussion over the list of scrubs broadcasters, see here Talk:Scrubs (TV series)#Removal of International Broadcasters section, thank you--Jac16888 19:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)