Hi Shubharm2019,
Noticed the talk page of OpIndia where you have posted a note saying the Wikipedia write up on OpIndia is biased. I quite agree with you.
It's interesting that IFCN's denial of membership stems from the fact that OpIndia does not entertain left liberal views. [1]
The fact that IFCN rejects OpIndia's membership application because it prefers to focus on right leaning views is a complete different thing from the ability to objectively assess if the right leaning fact is correctly presented. If anything it brings out a possible bias of IFCN.
Stated another way an organization that focuses on Cricket as a sport may be biased to it, but to be denied IFCN membership because it may not report Soccer facts accurately is quite controversial. One's bias and one's objectivity may be two different things.
Infact Wikipedia's own policy on Reliable Sources under the heading of Biased Sources acknowledges this, that biased sources need not be inaccurate. The bias may be a focus on a certain topic and need not mean its being presented incorrectly. [2]
Hence the Wikipedia lead section to the OpIndia page that has a single line which disparages a good organization, '...and has propagated fake news over multiple occasions.[3]' is incorrect, malicious and needs a correction.
A number of other reputed media outlets including the BBC could have been factually incorrect. Why should such an observation not be made of them then?
Look forward to hearing your thoughts. Will post this on the OpIndia Wiki Talk page too.