Tag: Reverted |
Undid revision 1134004304 by Abbasulu (talk) undo canvassing per user talk page/ANI Tag: Undo |
||
Line 293: | Line 293: | ||
::It's probably because she's such a big personality, a giantess of Indian cinema, people are often intimidated promoting core articles like her. Hope you're well! ♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span>]] 21:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC) |
::It's probably because she's such a big personality, a giantess of Indian cinema, people are often intimidated promoting core articles like her. Hope you're well! ♦ [[User talk:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span>]] 21:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
:::@[[User:Dr. Blofeld|Dr. Blofeld]]: Could be, it requires a lot of work to do justice to her, and time as well. [[User:Shshshsh|<span style="color:blue">'''''Shahid'''''</span>]] • <sup>''[[User talk:Shshshsh|<span style="color:teal">Talk</span><span style="color:black">'''2'''</span><span style="color:teal">me</span>]]''</sup> 22:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC) |
:::@[[User:Dr. Blofeld|Dr. Blofeld]]: Could be, it requires a lot of work to do justice to her, and time as well. [[User:Shshshsh|<span style="color:blue">'''''Shahid'''''</span>]] • <sup>''[[User talk:Shshshsh|<span style="color:teal">Talk</span><span style="color:black">'''2'''</span><span style="color:teal">me</span>]]''</sup> 22:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
==Would You please cast your opinions in those deletion discussions as well?== |
|||
Both of these articles are well sourced, but faces the wrath of some wikipedians because they want a reference for every single song for almost 1000+ songs which is very unfair. Would you please support those rich articles? |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Malayalam_songs_recorded_by_P._Susheela |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Malayalam_songs_recorded_by_K._J._Yesudas |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Malayalam_songs_recorded_by_S._Janaki |
|||
[[User:Abbasulu|Abbasulu]] ([[User talk:Abbasulu|talk]]) 15:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:48, 16 January 2023
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lekin... you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 05:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
The article Lekin... you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lekin... for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate (talk) 14:41, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Lekin...
Hello! Your submission of Lekin... at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:24, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- Rhododendrites, I've replied to you there. Shahid • Talk2me 17:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Hamari Beti
Hello! Your submission of Hamari Beti at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Umimmak (talk) 21:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Rudaali
On 12 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rudaali, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dimple Kapadia won the National Film Award for Best Actress for playing a professional mourner in the film Rudaali? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rudaali. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rudaali), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hi
Would you like to present your points here?Krish | Talk To Me 15:59, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Lekin...
On 15 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lekin..., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while playing a ghost in the mystery film Lekin..., Dimple Kapadia was forbidden to blink because director Gulzar believed it would make her feel surreal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lekin.... You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lekin...), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Heyy
Hi Shahid, hope you're doing well. could you do me a favor and take a quick look at this when you get the time? (PS: I think you're one of the best copy-editors around and I'll love to have your inputs on it.)
have a good day :D Meryam90 (talk) 09:07, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Hamari Beti
On 23 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hamari Beti, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1950 Hindi film Hamari Beti, which featured Nutan's first lead role, at 14 years of age, was directed by her mother? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hamari Beti. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hamari Beti), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
DYK for Juice (2017 film)
On 8 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Juice (2017 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2017 short film Juice, starring Shefali Shah as a middle-class Indian wife defying patriarchal norms, won two Filmfare Short Film Awards? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Juice (2017 film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Juice (2017 film)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
DYK for Hum Log (film)
On 10 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hum Log (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rajendra Kumar was supposed to play his first major role in the 1951 social drama Hum Log but was replaced a few days into filming? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hum Log (film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hum Log (film)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For your work on Preity Zinta, now a featured topic. As you have been told multiple times before, I'm sure, your work on it inspired a number of editors to do the same with other Indian actors. FrB.TG (talk) 14:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC) |
Fun fact: each of the featured promotions were roughly seven years apart (biography in 2008, filmography in 2015 and awards in 2022). FrB.TG (talk) 14:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- @FrB.TG Thanks so much! Indeed, seven years apart (the bio was first promoted to FA in 2008 actually, so you're very correct about the seven-year gap between each promotion). Right now working on Shefali Shah's article. I'm sure you've seen some films with her. Thanks again for the barnstar. Shahid • Talk2me 14:53, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- No problem. Much deserved. I have seen Shah in some films but so far only in supporting parts. Filmmakers didn’t tap into her full potential in those films but I’m happy to see she’s now finding a long overdue success as a leading lady. Do let me know if you take it to GAN or FAC. I’ll be more than happy to review it. FrB.TG (talk) 15:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rudaali you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FrB.TG -- FrB.TG (talk) 13:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
The article Rudaali you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rudaali for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FrB.TG -- FrB.TG (talk) 10:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
The article Rudaali you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rudaali for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FrB.TG -- FrB.TG (talk) 13:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Madhuri Dixit's Introduction Page
Madhuri Dixit's page 1. In the introduction section, 6th line - it is written as "Dixit's early career was shaped up mostly by romantic and family dramas before she expanded her repertoire"... This line appears to be vague and irrelevant. Infact in the beginning of her career itself, she appeared in the films like Parinda, Dharavi, Prahaar, Prem Pratigya etc. Which are neither Family Drama nor Romantic Films. Also writing such lines on a legendary actress page does not make any sense. 2. Noted by critics for her beauty, dancing skills, and strong characters - Instead of Strong Characters, it can conveniently written as Acting Skills which was there earlier as well. AIL601 (talk) 12:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- @AIL601: I disagree with you. Even in Parinda, she had a small role which was strictly that of a love interest. Prem Pratigya is an out-and-out romance. There might have been exceptions like Prahaar and Dharavi, but they were few and far between. The films that shaped her early career are Tezaab, Tridev, Dil, Saajan, Beta, Khalnayak, HAHK, Raja, and the likes. Strong characters is what I think suits better. I believe she is recognised as a huge, charismatic star, less as strictly an actor. Shahid • Talk2me 13:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Madhuri Dixit's Introduction Page
Dear Shahid, Every actor in the world grows at a pace & then evolves and especially in Indian Film Industry, people play supporting roles, two minute appearances etc in the forgettable films in the beginning of their careers and yet immediately labelled as actors. How many actors in the mainstream / commercial Hindi film industry has had a diversified filmography in their early phase itself to be called as Great Actors? By writing the phrase as "Early career being shaped mostly by some genre before expanding repertoire" in the introductory section of the wikipedia page of a legendary actor and labelling them like this devaluate them. This particular phrase is irrelevant and unnecessary. I strongly oppose this and request to remove it.
Thanks AIL601 (talk) 15:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Hey bud, could you keep an eye out on this article that I had earlier taken to GA? A revert-loving fan doesn't really seem to understand how to keep the article's quality intact. Would really appreciate it. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:54, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Nagina (1951 film)
On 28 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nagina (1951 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nutan, the lead actress of the 1951 A-rated suspense thriller Nagina, was not allowed to enter the film's premiere because she was underage? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nagina (1951 film). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nagina (1951 film)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Copyediting request
Hey man. I have recently expanded yet another actor biography, Oscar Isaac, and intend to take it to FAC in the near future. According to the article‘s history, I have authored around 80 percent of it so it only makes sense that someone else takes a look at it before I nominate it for FA. With that in mind, I was wondering if you could give it a go? That is if you have the time or inclination. I‘m not fully done expanding it yet, but I don‘t expect to make major additions anymore so you can start as soon as now. Thank you either way. FrB.TG (talk) 15:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- @FrB.TG: Hi there, my dear friend. Thank you for this message. I wish I had a little more time to take part in this impressive project. I've been quite busy off late and the few minutes I give WP these days are spent on random corrections off my watchlist. If I get some free time, I'll be more than happy to give it a go. Shahid • Talk2me 13:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your help. Isaac has passed its FAC. FrB.TG (talk) 04:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- @FrB.TG: Ohhh, I thought it'd have more time and I could support it too. I wish I had more time, I did nothing really. Brilliant work as always, way to go. Shahid • Talk2me 08:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Polite requests
- Stop complaining about how I'm "bludgeoning" while yourself feeling the need to respond to every single one of my comments with one of your own.
- Please stop attempting to impose your proof by assertion by telling me to stop commenting about said arguments.
- Please don't come back on my talk page again.
Thank you RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:54, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- @RandomCanadian: In my first messages I did let you know I believe you mean well, but it started getting out of proportions and instead of letting the AfDs run their course, it seemed like you really couldn't accept others' disparate views and as time went by, just became increasingly involved and invested in one goals: to have these pages deleted because you know what's right. The ensuing intolerance to others' legitimate opinions made the process quite unpleasant. That's not how it should work. I have nothing against you, I really don't hold any grudge, and I still like to believe you mean well. But please, spare me these empty, senseless warnings. You know well they have no place here. You should better apologise for this hostile behaviour. Shahid • Talk2me 18:17, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Subhash K. Jha for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhash K. Jha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The AfDs.
All the sources on the articles are database sites. I would take it to AfD, but there is literally a 100 articles that are poorly sourced (starring Dharmendra/Mithun Chakraborty). Are these films well known, is that why they shouldn't be deleted? If so, where are the sources?
I understand that you want to save the articles, which is good. But just give me an input on whether these low-budget films were box office successes or not. DareshMohan (talk) 00:14, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- @DareshMohan: Thank you for this message. The question is not whether these films were box office successes. I'm not sure notability should be directly associated with commercial success. The question is whether information on their box-office performance is provided to begin with, and I saw that many of them do have figures on Box Office India. Are they hits? Quite the contrary, actually, as one would expect with films which are essentially B-grade films. But sources exist. There are too many of those PRODs, and I'm too busy to have time for editing and digging in the archives these days, otherwise, as you might know from my history of improving articles at AfDs, I'd save as many as I can. Since I can't, and I'm not sure speedy deletion is the right course of action, I suggested that you consider AfD, hoping that someone would kindly do the job and save at least some of them. Shahid • Talk2me 00:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ok makes sense. I am not going to AFD them (the ones with big actors) because they may have sources/doing AFD for 100 articles would take forever. Why not just redirect them to the main actor or to Mithun's Dream Factory (twenty-six films directed by T. L. V. Prasad starring Mithun) DareshMohan (talk) 00:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- @DareshMohan: I think it could be a good option at least for some if not most of these pages. Shahid • Talk2me 09:12, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ok makes sense. I am not going to AFD them (the ones with big actors) because they may have sources/doing AFD for 100 articles would take forever. Why not just redirect them to the main actor or to Mithun's Dream Factory (twenty-six films directed by T. L. V. Prasad starring Mithun) DareshMohan (talk) 00:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Are you 100% sure that the film released? Surprised that it wasn't on Raveena Tandon filmography. DareshMohan (talk) 03:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- @DareshMohan: Not sure at all! Looking for sources, might change my own vote. Shahid • Talk2me 09:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | ||
For your work in sourcing Indian films. DareshMohan (talk) 04:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC) |
- @DareshMohan: Thank you for this kind gesture. I appreciate that. :) Shahid • Talk2me 09:09, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
PRODs
See Megha (1996 film) and Yash (film) and add sources please. DareshMohan (talk) 06:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Help!
Hello, Shshshsh! You were able to find lots of refs at this Indian-film related AfD. I've came across this article, Bandhan (1956 film), during NPP, and want to AfD it as my WP:BEFORE search found few refs, the current ones are inadequate for WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. If you have time, could you see if you could find any refs? Many thanks for your help, if you are not interested in this, apologies and have a nice day:) VickKiang (talk) 22:18, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- @VickKiang: Will look for some as soon as I have more time. Shahid • Talk2me 09:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Ingane Oru Nilapakshi (2000)
Can you find any reviews from the archives? DareshMohan (talk) 07:29, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- @DareshMohan: There aren't any, sadly. Shahid • Talk2me 10:40, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Promotion of Shefali Shah
- Way to go! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:14, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- Gog the Mild: Thank you for your quick and effective management of the FAC process (not just of this article, but in general). SNUGGUMS: Thanks a ton for your helpful review, as always, and for this kind message. Shahid • Talk2me 09:13, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations, OG! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- Well done Shahid, amazing expansion given what the article was before!! I didn't see the nomination, I'd have given it a massive grilling Sarvagnya/Fowler style haha. Just kidding! Good to see you pop up Krimuk it's been a while! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: Thank you Blof. Shahid • Talk2me 11:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yeh, I totally missed this FAC. Congrats! --Dwaipayan (talk) 19:19, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Dwaipayanc: Thanks so much, good to see you after so long. Shahid • Talk2me 22:48, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yeh, I totally missed this FAC. Congrats! --Dwaipayan (talk) 19:19, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: Thank you Blof. Shahid • Talk2me 11:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Someday (2020 film)
Hello Shshshsh,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Someday (2020 film) for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is a simple typo.
If you don't want Someday (2020 film) to be deleted, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Lithopsian (talk) 12:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Um ...
"Some changes" (you're welcome) would be ... capitalizing the word short? Removing the (unrendered) space near the end of that line, or that crooked 2 those in the infobox? "As written" templates? Oh, I know: we both really hate how some asterisks (bullets) have spaces after them and some don't.
Please don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. Doodoodave (talk) 16:00, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Doodoodave: Are "As written" templates for a Hindi film title really called for? Removal of a wikilink for awards isn't very good either. Restoring your contribution though. Shahid • Talk2me 16:16, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Doodoodave: Also, I had to fix all your image captions. The name should be there, that's how it's done, and sizes are not necessary. Shahid • Talk2me 16:34, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- Also removal of commas after "in year". Shahid • Talk2me 16:43, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- Commas exist for a reason. --Doodoodave (talk) 17:50, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Doodoodave: Could you please communicate without these cynical links? I find it slightly disrespectful. Thank you. Shahid • Talk2me 18:07, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yes. But that's just an opinion.--Doodoodave (talk) 18:53, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- I do not see that the policy you cite here re captions justifies what you did - captions must identify the subject. As for commas, irrelevant here. Shahid • Talk2me 18:16, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Doodoodave: Could you please communicate without these cynical links? I find it slightly disrespectful. Thank you. Shahid • Talk2me 18:07, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- Commas exist for a reason. --Doodoodave (talk) 17:50, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- Also removal of commas after "in year". Shahid • Talk2me 16:43, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Doodoodave: Also, I had to fix all your image captions. The name should be there, that's how it's done, and sizes are not necessary. Shahid • Talk2me 16:34, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
FYI
1. These are main articles.
2. Dis sayin' ...
Doodoodave (talk) 19:21, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Doodoodave: Yes, but they aren't main articles in relation to the career section, but rather lists providing additional information. It would be a main article if it was something like Meryl Streep in the 2000s, which is cited here. As for the quotes, I just thought em dashes were more suitable in the specific cases where they're now used. Shahid • Talk2me 19:40, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Mister Mummy
Can you create an article on this film? DareshMohan (talk) 04:25, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- @DareshMohan: Hi there, too busy, sorry. Shahid • Talk2me 09:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Biased
The basis of introduction and biography write ups of various people on wikipedia are different from each other despite being of same professions and with similar achievements. AIL601 (talk) 01:42, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- @AIL601: Didn't understand much what you're trying to say. The fact that other pages have problems doesn't mean this one should. If you support the addition of "influential" to the lead of Dixit, then I'm afraid you do not fully understand Wikipedia's goal and rules. Wikipedia isn't a film magazine, it doesn't use puffery but describes facts. We should describe facts. When I have more time, I'll add more of her achievements and stature. But not like that, "influential" is a terrible word for an encyclopedia. For the record, I love Madhuri Dixit. Shahid • Talk2me 09:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Shah Rukh Khan Website
The Shah Rukh Khan website needs to be on Shah Rukh Khan’s page. It’s a website about him.KrishJ2001 (talk) 06:35, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Can't believe this still isn't a GA! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:51, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: Soon hopefully. Shahid • Talk2me 11:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- It's probably because she's such a big personality, a giantess of Indian cinema, people are often intimidated promoting core articles like her. Hope you're well! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: Could be, it requires a lot of work to do justice to her, and time as well. Shahid • Talk2me 22:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- It's probably because she's such a big personality, a giantess of Indian cinema, people are often intimidated promoting core articles like her. Hope you're well! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:20, 15 January 2023 (UTC)