NewsAndEventsGuy (talk | contribs) →Tip: new section |
|||
Line 309: | Line 309: | ||
For the Arbitration Committee, '''[[User:L235|Kevin]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·'''  [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·'''  [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 04:26, 26 December 2016 (UTC) |
For the Arbitration Committee, '''[[User:L235|Kevin]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]] '''·'''  [[User talk:L235#top|t]] '''·'''  [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 04:26, 26 December 2016 (UTC) |
||
: Discuss this at: '''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration motion regarding Palestine-Israel articles 3]]''' |
: Discuss this at: '''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration motion regarding Palestine-Israel articles 3]]''' |
||
== Tip == |
|||
I saw your note to an admin at the AE board, and thought I'd stop by to offer a helpful note. I'm just a regular editor, and I don't work in this subject area, but I do have a lot of experience with DS and AE. That admin is correct, Discretionary sanctions thru the AE board is <ins>not available</ins> unless you can show that the ed you complain about is already "on notice" about the arb ruling. There are various ways to show they are on notice, and you can read about that at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions#Awareness]]. If a mistake has been made, others always appreciate hearing an acknowledgment. [[User:NewsAndEventsGuy|NewsAndEventsGuy]] ([[User talk:NewsAndEventsGuy|talk]]) 19:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:56, 3 January 2017
WP:ARBPIA3#500/30
Ok on waiting, but is it 500 edits, 30 days or both? Seraphimsystem (talk) 05:53, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
How can I see the total number of edits I've made? I found the full list under contributions but I dont see a count ... Seraphimsystem (talk) 06:51, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
NM, found it. Seraphimsystem (talk) 07:23, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
In the article "Battle of Ayta-Ash Shaab", it says that Hizbullah claims 200 Israeli KIA/WIA, and posts a link which leads to an interview with a Hezbollah fighter about this matter. In spite of it clearly being stated by the fighter and also, correctly translated, it is yet stated incorrectly on the article. He does not say "200 killed and wounded" - he says "not less than 50 casualties".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZNViirWTnk From 04:22 and forwards.
Thanks,
SQ
Merger of 1517 Hebron pogrom and 1517 Safed pogrom articles
Following your remark at the talk:1834 Safed pogrom#page title, you are welcome to participate in merger procedure of 1517 Hebron pogrom and 1517 Safed pogrom articles into Jewish communities during the 1517 Ottoman-Mamluk war. Discuss it at talk:1517 Safed pogrom#Rename.GreyShark (dibra) 22:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
JSTOR Survey (and an update)
Hi! Just a quick update that while JSTOR and The Wikipedia Library discuss expanding the partnership, they've gone ahead and extended the pilot access again, until May 31st. Thanks, JSTOR!
It would be really helpful for growing the program if you would fill out this short survey about your usage and experience with JSTOR:
Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Anti-IDF politicisation of Canada Park
Hi, you edited Canada Park many years ago, and sadly a similar POV issue reared its ugly head again today (zero0000 ...I bet you never heard of that guy, and surely you've never known him to ever be involved in political POV disputes? ;-) ).
Luckily, Pluto has resolved most of the POV issues which are specific to the Modern Era (1948 & 1967) -- although you may want to add
,
and please do check Canada Park in a week or month to be sure zero0000/etc didn't taint Pluto's edit with a new round of one-sided argument/POV, but also, I wonder if (Jethro or) you would like to review the rationale for adding a brief Ancient History sub-section as follows...since Canada Park is mainly an Archaeology Park to preserve the (ancient and medieval/other) ruins more than an attempt to really preserve the Palestinian ruins. Thus it only seems natural that an article about an Archaeology Park should bear at least a brief mention the periods of the historic era during which the ruins of forts therein were built: it's also relevant to 1947-8 & 1967 because the fort & castle were placed there to defend strategic high ground for the same reasons that Ayalon-Canada Park became a target in 1948/67. Here are some sub-sections that I was starting when zero0000 deleted it; maybe it shows more of a "consensus" if you expand on this concept instead of me [and I'll write the same to user/Ynhockey who commented on the talk page], also I can't edit today due to the 1-revert rule, and it helps to have "eyes on" the article to be sure they don't again taint what Pluto added:
---Ancient and medieval---
The site is identified by archaeologists as being built atop biblical Aijalon, which has been held by armies due to its strategic high ground in both ancient and modern times. Some of the antiquities/ruins at the Park and nearby tourist attractions are detailed in the "Further information" links at the top of this section, as well as more details about the region's history. ---Post WW2---
(need to replace the dashes (---) with equal signs (===) 72.183.52.92 (talk) 19:21, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jews_and_Communism_(2nd_nomination)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jews_and_Communism_(2nd_nomination). Thanks. MarkBernstein (talk) 21:35, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Template:Z48
Question
Would you mind explaining why you made this revert? Kipa Aduma, Esq. (talk) 08:48, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- I was just going to ask the same thing, that edit is what Toatec was sanctioned for edit warring over. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 08:50, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- Mistake--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 08:53, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for self-reverting. Kipa Aduma, Esq. (talk) 08:56, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Thanks for fixing it nonetheless, and good work :-) ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 08:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- Mistake--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 08:53, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello
Hello I have created an account to be able to seek my contribution possible. I headed to the discussion page, as you suggested after you reported me for edit warring, and to my surprise found you had already been involved in this topic. It seems to me, you are not a NPOV user to be active in this article, especially in this section. It seems very wrong of your part to suppress information.
User50.14.223.132 (talk) 01:11, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
I realize that there is much heat regarding I/P issues but I am truly not trying to edit war over whether Amos Schocken has used the analogy. I read his recent op/ed piece in Haaretz and thought it was interesting that he had and thought it was worth noting. Both my subsequent edits have been attempts to answer the concerns expressed in the edit summaries. Best to all involved. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 20:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Declined speedy
I've declined the speedy at User:Aaronshavit/Allegations of Zionism and racism. WP:G4 doesn't really apply to userspace copies and we can't assume that the editor isn't planning on trying to improve the article and move it to the mainspace. WP:MfD would probably be the best way to go about this. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:30, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Re YGM
Hi Shrike,
Thanks for sending me a resource via bayfiles.net. Unfortunately, I'm not able to access the request. Probably due to my Government internet provider who has been blocking access to lots of sites recently. Any other way you can send it to me? Success after some tweaking! :)
AshLin (talk) 07:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Resource request
Thanks for sending me the link. It opened at first but I can't access it now. It shows 404 error.--Skr15081997 (talk) 09:56, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Please fill out your JSTOR email
As one of the original 100 JSTOR account recipients, please fill out the very short email form you received just recently in order to renew your access. Even though you signed up before with WMF, we need you to sign up again with The Wikipedia Library for privacy reasons and because your prior access expired on July 15th. We do not have your email addresses now; we just used the Special:EmailUser feature, so if you didn't receive an email just contact me directly at jorlowitzgmail.com. Thanks, and we're working as quickly as possible to get you your new access! Jake (Ocaasi) 19:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Al Mezan centre figures
I have started a discussion on this here: Talk:Gaza War#Al Mezan centre figures Kingsindian (talk) 10:26, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
How can my own photo be verified?
I took the photo of the burning factory in Sderot. Flayer (talk) 06:51, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
WP:JSTOR access
Hello, WP:The Wikipedia Library has record of you being approved for access to JSTOR through the TWL partnership described at WP:JSTOR . You should have recieved a Wikipedia email User:The Interior or User:Ocaasi sent several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved. Thanks much, Sadads (talk) 21:20, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Note: You are recieving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved.
New York World Telegram
Hi Shrike,
I don't have any access to the New York World-Telegram. However, a reference librarian might be able to help you obtain this via microfilm from the Center for Research Libraries. Best, GabrielF (talk) 03:32, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 12:32, 23 August 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Nikkimaria (talk) 12:32, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Just wondering, did you send me an email? (I'm getting a message that it might not be you). Elockid (Talk) 02:36, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
ANI
Hello. You are the topic of a discussion at ANI. Regards - DocumentError (talk) 08:17, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Notice
DRN discussion on Hamas rockets.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 03:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hello Shrike. There is an open DRN request at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#2014 Israel–Gaza conflict, where you are listed as a participant. The request may have to close without action soon due to lack of participation. It looks like you did make at least one talk edit about Hamas rockets on 30 August. It would be helpful if you could join in the discussion since DRN is one of the more pleasant options for resolving differences of opinion. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 23:23, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Sepsis II sockpuppet investigation
Hi. Regarding your sockpuppet investigation suggesting that Erictheenquirer is a sockpuppet of Sepsis II, we're going to need more specific evidence in order to make a credible case. The mere fact that Erictheenquirer has similar interests to Sepsis II isn't enough — and the fact that these two users seem to be editing from opposite sides of the world (see the Wikichecker reports for Erictheenquirer and Sepsis II) constitutes fairly strong evidence against the two being the same person. Unless you can present something much more compelling here, I (or another SPI clerk) will probably have no choice but to close this investigation without taking any action. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 03:08, 2 September 2014 (UTC) @Richwales: You can close I didn't looked at this graph when I submitted the SPI I still think that Erictheenquirer editing patterns are strange --Shrike (talk) 06:02, 2 September 2014 (UTC) @Richwales:Thank you for drawing it to my attention that I had been accused of being a sockpuppet. Much appreciated. @Shrike: I will endeavour to make my editing patterns less strange ... if you can inform me as to what exactly I need to do to remedy your disquiet. Erictheenquirer (talk) 14:48, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
ORN discussion
Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion
Hello, Shrike. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kingsindian (talk) 07:26, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Talk:1834_Safed_pogrom#1834_looting_of_Safed
Hi Shrike, I answered your question at Talk:1834_Safed_pogrom#1834_looting_of_Safed. Please could you let me know your thoughts on the basis of that? Oncenawhile (talk) 23:30, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your response. I am keen to find a way to conclude this long running discussion. I have responded to you on the talk page. Oncenawhile (talk) 19:37, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Referendums vs Referenda
You realize that you are "edit warring " with an IP editor, over two correct spellings of the same word. Both Referendums and Referenda are acceptable plurals of Referendum. It's a preference just like "gray" and "grey".--NotWillyWonka (talk) 19:56, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Followup
Following up on the RSN, input would be appreciated on the talk page Talk:Rafah_massacre#RSN_on_Sacco.27s_book. MarciulionisHOF (talk) 00:12, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
I invite you to a discussion
Hi. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaza beach explosion (2006) should be moved to Israeli bombing of the Gaza beach (2006). I would like to know your opinion about this issue.--Mevarus (talk) 01:48, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Operation Black Arrow
Removed paragraphs had no source other than "Schiff p222", said book referenced could not be found after searching so a quote from the book is needed. Removed the text because it conflicted with the knowledge of Nasser having not funded the fedayeen before 1955 as claimed.
You've got mail!
Message added 22:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
—Sadat (Masssly)❤Talk☮C☺Email☯ 22:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
TWL HighBeam check-in
Hello Wikipedia Library Users,
You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
- Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
- Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
- Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thank you. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:46, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
TWL Questia check-in
Hello!
You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
- Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
- When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
- Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
- Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thanks!
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:11, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
TWL Questia check-in
Hello!
You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
- Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
- When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
- Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
- Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Psychotherapy in Australia
Hi Shrike,
I noticed you filled this request once before for:
- Resnick, J. The Zeitgeist Movement [online]. Psychotherapy in Australia, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2009 Feb: 25.
I contacted the requester, but he has since lost the text. Any chance you still have access to this text?
Here is my request in WikiProject Resource Exchange: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request#Psychotherapy_in_Australia
Thanks OnlyInYourMindT 19:23, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Nevermind, someone else has filled the request. Thanks anyway! Happy editing! :-) OnlyInYourMindT 19:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Sockhunting
Hello!
You have experience of sniffing out Iloveandrea socks. Could I ask you for a second opinion on an interesting editor, before I waste too much time marshalling reams of evidence for SPI? bobrayner (talk) 19:50, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- I don't have time to check his edits but pay attention that he usually edit from leftist/socialist POV.--Shrike (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- I am pretty sure its him. Also run the tool against other socks.--Shrike (talk) 19:56, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library needs you!
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
- Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
- Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
- Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
- Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
- Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
- Research coordinators: run reference services
Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
NPOV
Would you care to explain why this edit is more NPOV than the previous version? Debresser (talk) 19:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
WP:ARBPIA3
What's up with this edit summary? Al-Andalusi (talk) 18:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Shrike. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Shrike. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and happy holidays!
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message
Arbitration motion regarding Palestine-Israel articles 3
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Remedy 2 (General Prohibition) is modified to read as follows:
- All IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. This prohibition is preferably enforced by the use of extended confirmed protection, but where that is not feasible, it may also be enforced by reverts, page protections, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters.
- The sole exceptions to this prohibition are:
- Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the above methods. This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, noticeboard discussions, etc.
- Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not required.
For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 04:26, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration motion regarding Palestine-Israel articles 3
Tip
I saw your note to an admin at the AE board, and thought I'd stop by to offer a helpful note. I'm just a regular editor, and I don't work in this subject area, but I do have a lot of experience with DS and AE. That admin is correct, Discretionary sanctions thru the AE board is not available unless you can show that the ed you complain about is already "on notice" about the arb ruling. There are various ways to show they are on notice, and you can read about that at Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions#Awareness. If a mistake has been made, others always appreciate hearing an acknowledgment. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 19:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)