Content deleted Content added
→My sock claims: new section |
→My sock claims: question |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
You can always speak directly to me. There are only very few users not welcome to my TP, who I hope know themselves. Just be kind, not merely polite, that is enough. BTW "Findblogging" was a confusion and I cleared it where I had to. However, I do have suspicions you are using sock puppets, that is true... All the best. --[[User:E4024|E4024]] ([[User talk:E4024|talk]]) 14:05, 28 November 2012 (UTC) |
You can always speak directly to me. There are only very few users not welcome to my TP, who I hope know themselves. Just be kind, not merely polite, that is enough. BTW "Findblogging" was a confusion and I cleared it where I had to. However, I do have suspicions you are using sock puppets, that is true... All the best. --[[User:E4024|E4024]] ([[User talk:E4024|talk]]) 14:05, 28 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
:Now that you have cleared the "confusion" of Findblogging have you apologised to Seric about Findblogging and for your canvassing of admins that he is a sockmaster and for not notifying him of your actions? [[User:Dr.K.|Δρ.Κ.]] <small><sup style="position:relative">[[User talk:Dr.K.|λόγος]]<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">[[Special:Contributions/Dr.K.|πράξις]]</span></sup></small> 15:58, 28 November 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:58, 28 November 2012
Archives Archives: |
---|
FYI
Hi Seric2. I just happened to see this. I find it laughable but here you are. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 00:41, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, thanks for the heads up, probably wouldn't have seen it otherwise. Never been accused of being a sock before, I wonder what made him (I assume) think that I was? Anyway, thanks again for the heads up! Seric2 (talk) 14:41, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hmmmm, over the past couple of days I have been trying to avoid any kind of confrontation with E4024 to somehow show that I do not agree with Findblogging, or any of his/her potential socks. I've only been making small corrections and what I would consider cosmetic changes. A I said this has never happened before, I am unsure how to proceed. I'm not even sure if it would be appropriate for me to make a comment in theses particular talk pages, but at the same time I want to alleviate any concerns they might have (such as pointing out edits such as this one). I've been on Wikipedia long enough to know that socks are a bad idea. If you resort to imposing your POV against the majority, then it's more then likely that your the one who might want to reconsider your position. Wikipedia is a truly global community, that includes users form different beliefs, nationality, sexual orientation etc. To incorporate all of this into Wikipedia, there needs to be discussion even on the most mundane of subjects. To impose your reality by creating socks, I find that offensive. After all, it's not about being right, it's about doing right. Wow, I think I might have gone a bit off topic there... Thank you so much for the continued heads up! Don't suppose you'd be would be willing to give me any advice if you were in my position? and I sincerely hope you never are. Thanks Seric2 (talk) 13:51, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
My sock claims
You can always speak directly to me. There are only very few users not welcome to my TP, who I hope know themselves. Just be kind, not merely polite, that is enough. BTW "Findblogging" was a confusion and I cleared it where I had to. However, I do have suspicions you are using sock puppets, that is true... All the best. --E4024 (talk) 14:05, 28 November 2012 (UTC)