Seb az86556 (talk | contribs) |
88.104.27.2 (talk) →AIV: r |
||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hello Seb, I will be celebrating my birthday on 19 March. So, I would like to give you a treat. If you decide to "eat" the cookie, please reply by placing <nowiki>{{subst:munch}}</nowiki> on my talk page. I hope this cookie has made your day better. Cheers! {{;)}} [[User:Arctic Kangaroo|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Comic Sans MS">'''Arctic'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arctic Kangaroo|<span style="color:brown; font-family:Comic Sans MS">'''Kangaroo'''</span>]] 15:25, 17 March 2013 (UTC) |
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hello Seb, I will be celebrating my birthday on 19 March. So, I would like to give you a treat. If you decide to "eat" the cookie, please reply by placing <nowiki>{{subst:munch}}</nowiki> on my talk page. I hope this cookie has made your day better. Cheers! {{;)}} [[User:Arctic Kangaroo|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Comic Sans MS">'''Arctic'''</span>]] [[User talk:Arctic Kangaroo|<span style="color:brown; font-family:Comic Sans MS">'''Kangaroo'''</span>]] 15:25, 17 March 2013 (UTC) |
||
|} |
|} |
||
== Sheesh == |
|||
:If you can please stop for just one second, and think... you will see that I'm part of the solution, not part of the problem. Calm down. [[Special:Contributions/88.104.27.2|88.104.27.2]] ([[User talk:88.104.27.2|talk]]) 23:54, 19 March 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:54, 19 March 2013
earlier on this program... (archives) (+) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Barack Obama
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
you need to discuss those changes; they have been reverted on both articles. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 01:50, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Why do I *need to discuss* them? They were relevant additions, and I think well sourced.
There scandalously seems to be no negativity permitted in Obama's very lengthy Wikipedia article; which currently reads like a fanzine. Other biographical pages for living people, feature criticism/controversy sections, but not his of all people - which is both laughable and extremely irritating.Beingsshepherd (talk) 02:01, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Beingsshepherd
- This rant belongs here. And yeah, you do need to discuss them. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 02:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
I wasn't ranting, that doesn't answer my question, and it's perfectly apt for me to answer you-the deleter of my work's comment in my Talk page, in yours.Beingsshepherd (talk) 02:39, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Beingsshepherd
- The appropriate place to discuss changes to Barack Obama is at Talk:Barack Obama, where other editors can see your case for the changes and where a centralized discussion can take place. Acroterion (talk) 02:47, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Apologies
I didn't mean to put the warning on your talk page. only the ip users page. AnthonyJ Lock (talk) 08:33, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- haha no worries mate, it was my fault. AnthonyJ Lock (talk) 08:33, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Just how we refer to everyone I guess haha. AnthonyJ Lock (talk) 08:35, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Copernicus
I'm not sure how familiar you are with the history of the Copernicus article. After intense discussions a consensus version of the lead was reached and this version was stable fo a long time. A few days ago some users started to editwar and tried to add a Nationality to the lead (that was one of the main conflicts, even mentioned at WP:Lame). However, the latest editwar has led to a discussion about some minor changes in the lead section, but there's no agreed "new" version and contrary to the claims of some users, the latest additions are for sure not the result of any discussion. I restored the initial version because I think we should reach consensus BEFORE we make these changes. To restore this disputed version [1] and tell me I should discuss is a remarkable distortion of facts. Could you please restore the consensus version and wait until a new version is found. HerkusMonte (talk) 09:35, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
@ANI
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Do you even read what other people have to say? There really is no using posting another block of text that reads like some courtroom defense cooked up by 10 lawyers... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 20:14, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Do you even read about the extensive facts of this situation?
- I am sorry you feel the need to make repeated denigrating comments about this situation and my presentation of the facts. It's is easy to make a short comment if you don't address the facts that I have presented. Any time that you want to address the facts with me that contradict unsubstantiated opinions, let me know. I want to be able to work together in a constructive way.Wondering55 (talk) 01:41, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- The first step to that would be to take people's advice. Without that, your wiki-life will be a short one. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 02:04, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Will you take my constructive advice? The next step should be that you stop making denigrating comments. Your advice might be taken more seriously then.Wondering55 (talk) 03:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- I've never made any such comments. You may continue as you please, you've been given my warning. This discussion here is over. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 04:10, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- Will you take my constructive advice? The next step should be that you stop making denigrating comments. Your advice might be taken more seriously then.Wondering55 (talk) 03:45, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Howdy
Hope you don't mind that I deleted something awful from the history of your talk page. My apologies on behalf of humanity: I find it hard to believe people would say such things. Have a nice day, as the saying goes, Drmies (talk) 17:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah well, it says a lot about those who say it, not me. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 18:48, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Coat_of_arms_of_the_Sahrawi_Arab_Democratic_Republic#Move?
There's a discussion you might be interested in at Talk:Coat_of_arms_of_the_Sahrawi_Arab_Democratic_Republic#Move?. I'm telling you this because you were involved in Talk:Flag_of_Western_Sahara#Merger proposal and/or Talk:Flag_of_Western_Sahara#UNMERGING_ARTICLES. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 20:57, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Our discussion today about English and the new Pope
Hi Seb,
I apologize about the discussion we had today re: whether or not the new Pope spoke English. I think you are correct that one's fluency in English is by no means a measure of one's intellect, character, or ability. My guess is that you are multi-lingual, as am I. I was also once a Jesuit. I only guessed that the Pope probably spoke English because it seemed to me that much of the world's academia does seem to value English fluency as a sign of a thorough education these days, whether we like it or not. Whether or not this is fair or reasonable, that is a windmill that we can tilt at on another day.
Take care,
Scott P. (talk) 21:52, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
- Wow. This is unexpected and humbling. Thank you. I admit that my reaction might have been a bit too harsh, but understand that I deal with that particular assumption (no English=uneducated; the whole world must speak/learn it) on a regular basis. And I've seen the pain and destruction it causes. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 03:49, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
your reversions: suggestion
note that the following is only a suggestion:
while it is not against policy to revert comments on your user talk page, I encourage you to instead use collapse and archiving. editors may feel that they have valid reasons for posting, although the way in which they are posted is not quite acceptable. I also suggest that you try and discuss such matters with the editors in a civil manner, instead of just reverting and putting a template on their user talk. explain why what they posted was unacceptable, and hear them out on the issue (if they are civil about it).
again, this is only a suggestion, I cannot make anyone do anything, nor would I want to. Aunva6 (talk) 16:57, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. I won't follow it. :) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 16:59, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Hello Seb, I will be celebrating my birthday on 19 March. So, I would like to give you a treat. If you decide to "eat" the cookie, please reply by placing {{subst:munch}} on my talk page. I hope this cookie has made your day better. Cheers! Arctic Kangaroo 15:25, 17 March 2013 (UTC) |
Sheesh
- If you can please stop for just one second, and think... you will see that I'm part of the solution, not part of the problem. Calm down. 88.104.27.2 (talk) 23:54, 19 March 2013 (UTC)