No edit summary |
|||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
</div> [[User:Empire AS|<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: Red">Empire <span style="color: Blue;">''AS''</span></span>]] [[User talk:Empire AS|'''''<sup><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: Purple;">Talk</span>!</sup>''''']] 17:58, 31 December 2020 (UTC) |
</div> [[User:Empire AS|<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: Red">Empire <span style="color: Blue;">''AS''</span></span>]] [[User talk:Empire AS|'''''<sup><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: Purple;">Talk</span>!</sup>''''']] 17:58, 31 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
== September 2021 == |
|||
[[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Separatist movements of Pakistan]]. Your edits appear to be [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive]] and have been or will be [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. |
|||
* If you are engaged in an article [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|content dispute]] with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the [[:Talk:Separatist movements of Pakistan|article's talk page]], and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] page, and ask for independent help at one of the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests|relevant noticeboards]]. |
|||
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]]. |
|||
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies and guidelines]], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> |
|||
== Your edits to Pakistan-related topics == |
== Your edits to Pakistan-related topics == |
Revision as of 16:56, 3 October 2021
Satrar, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Satrar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 21 November 2020 (UTC) |
Edits reverted
May I ask why are you reverting my edits everywhere without mentioning any reason other calling them nonsense/mindless?Insight 3 (talk) 15:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Empire AS Talk! 17:58, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you made several questionable edits to Separatist movements of Pakistan and CAC/PAC JF-17 Thunder. In this edit, you added that "in Azad Kashmir, 95% of respondents voted for all of Kashmir to accede to Pakistan" and that "The survey states, 94 % of Kashmiri's in Pakistan administered Kashmir wanted to join Pakistan." Both of these statements contradict the source, which states on page 17 that "AJK: 50% said they would vote for the whole of J&K to join Pakistan". Additionally, you replaced one instance of the source with a blog, which are generally considered to be unreliable.
In this edit, you reverted a sourced addition with the claim that it was "vandalism and removal of poorly sourced". While the source is of questionable neutrality, the article was clear to note that it was only a claim, and was not presenting the information as factual. - ZLEA T\C 17:28, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- ZLEA, actually the user I reported is clearly biased and quoting Indian sources (that too unreliable ones) and I'm sure they have been doing vandalism and edit war for long even before they have created the account. Moreover when I have reported them, they started begging to admins and giving rationale being Indian including racially profiling me. The articles you are talking about are heavily biased edited by socks and that's why I came out of that debate because I don't want to fight. Please keep in mind United Nations' resolutions are pending against these issues and merely refs can't convince them if UN resolutions can't. Thank you very much for the concern you have shown but remember they can't be reasoned with and clearly they are pursuing agenda of hatred. Regards. Satrar (talk) 14:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- "I'm sure they have been doing vandalism and edit war for long even before they have created the account." What made you come to that conclusion? Because they're Indian?
- "Please keep in mind United Nations' resolutions are pending against these issues and merely refs can't convince them if UN resolutions can't." How do you know that Echo1Charlie will not listen to UN resolutions if said resolutions are pending? Furthermore, what does that have to do with the neutrality of the articles? UN resolutions are not reliable sources.
- And finally, the claim that Echo1Charlie is pursuing an "agenda of hatred" is a bit extreme. How does their editing history show such behavior? All I have seen is them using Indian sources which, from what I see, do not contain hate language of any sort. - ZLEA T\C 16:37, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- ZLEA, instead of being sanctimonious why don't you do something usefull? I don't really care about what you think. So just don't waste your time here on my talk page. I'm grateful for your concern. Satrar (talk) 10:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Contrary to what you may think, I am trying to be useful. I see that you appear to be engaging in Tendentious editing by making unconstructive edits and are engaging in edit wars with Echo1Charlie. This shows that you have a lack of concern for Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I don't care how biased and "hateful" you think they are, there is no situation where your behavior is acceptable. Furthermore, you seem to have a bias when it comes to the Indo-Pakistani conflict. It's perfectly understandable, given the heated relationships the two countries have, but if you can't control the bias then it is best to leave the Indo-Pakistani topics alone and edit other areas of Wikipedia. You could argue that Echo1Charlie is biased as well, which may be the case, but they appear to be controlling it better than you, meanwhile you blatantly misrepresent the data in sources. You seem to have four of the five common tendencies of disruptive editors. You may think it's a waste of time for me to talk to you about it here, but similar behavior has gotten other editors blocked. If you want me to drop the discussion, I will, but please heed my advice. - ZLEA T\C 15:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- ZLEA, I'm as neutral as USA in case of China, WMDs (which were never found in Iraq) and last but not the least Afghanistan. So why don't you show conscious of your neutrality to some of your favorites like Israel? I hope at 19 years of age you are aware of biases. Get a job it's hight time for you. Satrar (talk) 16:51, 3 October 2021 (UTC)