No edit summary |
|||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
:Hmmm. I don't see it. Maybe try again. – [[user:Lionelt|Lionel]] <sup>([[user talk:Lionelt|talk]])</sup> 08:45, 6 October 2011 (UTC) |
:Hmmm. I don't see it. Maybe try again. – [[user:Lionelt|Lionel]] <sup>([[user talk:Lionelt|talk]])</sup> 08:45, 6 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
::OK. It's there now. I announced it at [[WT:RIGHT|WPConservatism talk]]. The formatting was stripped off. It would be a help if you added the <nowiki>==Sections== and the <ref>sources</ref></nowiki> back. – [[user:Lionelt|Lionel]] <sup>([[user talk:Lionelt|talk]])</sup> 09:42, 20 October 2011 (UTC) |
::OK. It's there now. I announced it at [[WT:RIGHT|WPConservatism talk]]. The formatting was stripped off. It would be a help if you added the <nowiki>==Sections== and the <ref>sources</ref></nowiki> back. – [[user:Lionelt|Lionel]] <sup>([[user talk:Lionelt|talk]])</sup> 09:42, 20 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::An editor has raised concerns that the article is COPYVIO. Please rewrite any sections directly copied from copyrighted sources. – [[user:Lionelt|Lionel]] <sup>([[user talk:Lionelt|talk]])</sup> 01:04, 22 October 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:04, 22 October 2011
Welcome...
Hello, Saris718, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there.
If you are interested in conservatism, you may want to check out the Conservatism Portal. [[Image:Template:LogoCon|30px|left]]Please accept this invitation to join the Conservatism WikiProject, a friendly group of editors dedicated to improving articles related to conservatism. Simply click here to accept!
Again, welcome! – Lionel (talk) 09:45, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CitizenLink was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! [CharlieEchoTango] 06:22, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
The article Focus Leadership Institute has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on CitizenLink (Formerly Focus on the Family Action), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 03:04, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
CitizenLink
Hi Saris. Too bad about the article. I'd like to suggest that you move a draft to the WikiProject Conservatism Incubator (WP:RIGHT/I). The members of WPConservatism will be able to review, improve and get that article back into mainspace in no time. You can do this one of two ways:
- Click here Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/Incubator/CitizenLink and paste the text, or
- Move the AfC version from Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CitizenLink to Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/Incubator/CitizenLink.
ttfn – Lionel (talk) 09:49, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Lionel. Thanks for the suggestion. I've posted it in your first link. Any tips, pointers, advice etc will be so helpful. Thanks! Saris Saris718 (talk)
- Hmmm. I don't see it. Maybe try again. – Lionel (talk) 08:45, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- OK. It's there now. I announced it at WPConservatism talk. The formatting was stripped off. It would be a help if you added the ==Sections== and the <ref>sources</ref> back. – Lionel (talk) 09:42, 20 October 2011 (UTC)