Ahrtoodeetoo (talk | contribs) →Matthew Whitaker: new section |
→top: arbitration enforcement |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Arbitration Enforcement== |
|||
Because of your stonewalling and persistent refusal to abide by consensus, as exemplified in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Abortion_and_mental_health&oldid=875608065#Notice_that_this_Article_Lacks_Balanced_POV_per_reliable_peer_reviewed_literature_reviews this discussion], and related edit warring over a {{tlx|POV}} tag, you are hereby placed under a discretionary sanction, as you were warning above above. You are hereby topic banned from editing any pages related to [[abortion]], broadly construed, for a period of three months. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 21:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC) |
|||
== Reminder re: discretionary sanctions, 1RR, and use of alternate accounts == |
== Reminder re: discretionary sanctions, 1RR, and use of alternate accounts == |
Revision as of 21:32, 27 December 2018
Arbitration Enforcement
Because of your stonewalling and persistent refusal to abide by consensus, as exemplified in this discussion, and related edit warring over a {{POV}}
tag, you are hereby placed under a discretionary sanction, as you were warning above above. You are hereby topic banned from editing any pages related to abortion, broadly construed, for a period of three months. Jehochman Talk 21:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Reminder re: discretionary sanctions, 1RR, and use of alternate accounts
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in Abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. In addition, as this is rather obviously not your main Wikipedia account, please be aware that the use of alternate accounts to avoid scrutiny on controversial topics is inappropriate.
MastCell Talk 21:06, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Template:Z33
August 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Abortion and mental health. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 17:04, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Matthew Whitaker
Hi, I'm writing you because you weighed in on this subject in a prior discussion. Are you aware that there's a pending RfC at Talk:Matthew Whitaker (attorney)#RfC: Jim Comey's comments about Matthew Whitaker? In fact, you're the only person who weighed in on that prior discussion and who hasn't voted in the RfC. Your participation would be welcomed. R2 (bleep) 21:23, 13 December 2018 (UTC)