→Žitomislić: Reply Tag: Reply |
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Santasa99/Archive 9) (bot |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
::Hi Santasa99. The edit summary is mandatory whether you place a template on the talk page or not. The talk page template is optional. You are correct that if you are the sole author, attribution is not required, but it's still helpful for patrolling admins if you do so. — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 15:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC) |
::Hi Santasa99. The edit summary is mandatory whether you place a template on the talk page or not. The talk page template is optional. You are correct that if you are the sole author, attribution is not required, but it's still helpful for patrolling admins if you do so. — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 15:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC) |
||
:::Yes, of course, I know that edit summary is mandatory on its own, that's elemental, and yes, it could be that I have done it before. However I am not sure that I am able to remember where, but if I do I will put this temp to appropriate TP. Also, most likely, when and if i used bits of text from one article for writing in another, then, it was again probably my own. Anyhow, I will be sure to use it every time I am reusing any amount of text from now on. Cheers.--[[User:Santasa99|<span style="color:maroon;text-shadow:#666362 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;font-size:0.8em;">'''౪ Santa ౪'''</span>]][[User talk:Santasa99|<span style="color:navy;text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;font-size:0.7em"><sup>'''''99°'''''</sup></span>]] 16:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC) |
:::Yes, of course, I know that edit summary is mandatory on its own, that's elemental, and yes, it could be that I have done it before. However I am not sure that I am able to remember where, but if I do I will put this temp to appropriate TP. Also, most likely, when and if i used bits of text from one article for writing in another, then, it was again probably my own. Anyhow, I will be sure to use it every time I am reusing any amount of text from now on. Cheers.--[[User:Santasa99|<span style="color:maroon;text-shadow:#666362 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;font-size:0.8em;">'''౪ Santa ౪'''</span>]][[User talk:Santasa99|<span style="color:navy;text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;font-size:0.7em"><sup>'''''99°'''''</sup></span>]] 16:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC) |
||
== Hajdučka Republika Mijata Tomića == |
|||
I've restored this to the [[List of micronations]] page, because (1) [https://www.vrleti.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/ustav.pdf there are many more than two people involved], and (2) while its page deletion is under discussion, that has not yet reached any consensus. – [[User:.Raven|<sub>'''•'''</sub>Raven]] <sup>[[User talk:.Raven| '''''.'''talk'']]</sup> 21:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:Look, I still like the idea, and I tried before to find a way and give article some credence after it barely survived AfD twice, but all boils down to a satire and the family business. It is not a serious local community effort, say, expressed in form of protest against some issue. I know that the hotelier raised the idea as a sort of protest against municipal blunder with providing an electricity, that he gave his best to promote the idea with posters and variety of materials, even printed passports and currency, but it's all for fun and advertising purpose - yes, according to primary source, every person that decide to eat at the restaurant is eligible for "citizenship" and will receive a "passport", but there is a difference between real micronation and this thing (by the way I think that our list-article on micronations is also based on misconception on what constitute "micronation"). What happens, happens. [[User:Santasa99|<span style="color:maroon;text-shadow:#666362 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;font-size:0.8em;">'''౪ Santa ౪'''</span>]][[User talk:Santasa99|<span style="color:navy;text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;font-size:0.7em"><sup>'''''99°'''''</sup></span>]] 22:11, 6 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Žitomislić == |
|||
I've moved Žitomislić around to allow for the village article to be linked. In the future, don't do a copy&paste move, just ask for help at [[WP:RM]] instead. If the village article needs to be renamed, likewise. --[[User:Joy|Joy]] ([[User talk:Joy|talk]]) 07:51, 30 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:Crazy - I wanted to contact you this morning but I was distracted so it slipped my mind, completely. Anyway, now it looks as it should. (The whole idea to create this redirect came from a blocked Zoupan without any logic and reason whatsoever behind it.) I hastened my hand in attempt to fix it, but mostly I was confused and wasn't sure how exactly to interpret some parts of [[Wikipedia:RM#CM|WP:RM#CM]] and [[WP:SWAP]], I did not pay enough attention on copy/paste issues explained. Later I turned my attention on parts where copy/paste is talked about, so I am now a bit more aware of the problem(s) and how to avoid them. Thanks, Joy, I really appreciate it. [[User:Santasa99|<span style="color:maroon;text-shadow:#666362 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;font-size:0.8em;">'''౪ Santa ౪'''</span>]][[User talk:Santasa99|<span style="color:navy;text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;font-size:0.7em"><sup>'''''99°'''''</sup></span>]] 11:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:03, 16 May 2023
16 May 2024 |
- Wikipedia:Template_index: Cleanup (#Neutrality_and_factual_accuracy, etc)
- Meta Category:Editor handbook
|
||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Linking and page manipulation |
---|
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bosnian genocide denial into Milorad Dodik. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Diannaa, I was sort of aware of this but didn't know that it's required to do something in that regard. So, basically, this
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
would suffice and can be used as a template in edit-summary (if copied text is short or not substantial) and in TP (if there is a lot of copied text). I think that in this case - Bosnian genocide denial > Milorad Dodik - I am a sole contributor of copied text, and it is not particularly intricate narrative it's more of a listing, but if I understood correctly, in case of being sole contributor then, maybe, it could be unnecessary. Please, just to be on the safe side, let me know if I understood this correctly? Thanks again, and stay safe.--౪ Santa ౪99° 15:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)- Hi Santasa99. The edit summary is mandatory whether you place a template on the talk page or not. The talk page template is optional. You are correct that if you are the sole author, attribution is not required, but it's still helpful for patrolling admins if you do so. — Diannaa (talk) 15:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, of course, I know that edit summary is mandatory on its own, that's elemental, and yes, it could be that I have done it before. However I am not sure that I am able to remember where, but if I do I will put this temp to appropriate TP. Also, most likely, when and if i used bits of text from one article for writing in another, then, it was again probably my own. Anyhow, I will be sure to use it every time I am reusing any amount of text from now on. Cheers.--౪ Santa ౪99° 16:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Santasa99. The edit summary is mandatory whether you place a template on the talk page or not. The talk page template is optional. You are correct that if you are the sole author, attribution is not required, but it's still helpful for patrolling admins if you do so. — Diannaa (talk) 15:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)