No edit summary |
→Important notice: Reply Tag: Reply |
||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[WP:ARBEE|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[WP:ARBEE|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
||
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 12:20, 27 May 2023 (UTC) |
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 12:20, 27 May 2023 (UTC) |
||
:Before you pasted this template on my TP you should have read the instructions that come with the template and advise not to do this if you can assume that the editor already knows that they edit in scope under ARBCOM sanctions, and it should have been very clear to you that I am well aware that the topic area in which I contribute is under ARBEE. It is particularly inappropriate to this is in order to kind of retaliate in same manner. [[User:Santasa99|<span style="color:maroon;text-shadow:#666362 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;font-size:0.8em;">'''౪ Santa ౪'''</span>]][[User talk:Santasa99|<span style="color:navy;text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;font-size:0.7em"><sup>'''''99°'''''</sup></span>]] 14:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:00, 27 May 2023
16 May 2024 |
- Wikipedia:Template_index: Cleanup (#Neutrality_and_factual_accuracy, etc)
- Meta Category:Editor handbook
|
||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Linking and page manipulation |
---|
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bosnian genocide denial into Milorad Dodik. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 14:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Diannaa, I was sort of aware of this but didn't know that it's required to do something in that regard. So, basically, this
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
would suffice and can be used as a template in edit-summary (if copied text is short or not substantial) and in TP (if there is a lot of copied text). I think that in this case - Bosnian genocide denial > Milorad Dodik - I am a sole contributor of copied text, and it is not particularly intricate narrative it's more of a listing, but if I understood correctly, in case of being sole contributor then, maybe, it could be unnecessary. Please, just to be on the safe side, let me know if I understood this correctly? Thanks again, and stay safe.--౪ Santa ౪99° 15:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)- Hi Santasa99. The edit summary is mandatory whether you place a template on the talk page or not. The talk page template is optional. You are correct that if you are the sole author, attribution is not required, but it's still helpful for patrolling admins if you do so. — Diannaa (talk) 15:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, of course, I know that edit summary is mandatory on its own, that's elemental, and yes, it could be that I have done it before. However I am not sure that I am able to remember where, but if I do I will put this temp to appropriate TP. Also, most likely, when and if i used bits of text from one article for writing in another, then, it was again probably my own. Anyhow, I will be sure to use it every time I am reusing any amount of text from now on. Cheers.--౪ Santa ౪99° 16:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Santasa99. The edit summary is mandatory whether you place a template on the talk page or not. The talk page template is optional. You are correct that if you are the sole author, attribution is not required, but it's still helpful for patrolling admins if you do so. — Diannaa (talk) 15:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Important notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Bosnia and Herzegovina topic area. Due to past disruption in this topic area is placed under WP:ARBEE and WP:ARBMAC, which means more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Johnbod (talk) 12:20, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Before you pasted this template on my TP you should have read the instructions that come with the template and advise not to do this if you can assume that the editor already knows that they edit in scope under ARBCOM sanctions, and it should have been very clear to you that I am well aware that the topic area in which I contribute is under ARBEE. It is particularly inappropriate to this is in order to kind of retaliate in same manner. ౪ Santa ౪99° 14:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC)