Springnuts (talk | contribs) →Please be civil: Correcting own edit: Fixed typo in the link Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
No edit summary |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
== Please be civil == |
== Please be civil == |
||
Good morning. I’m sorry you are unhappy with the third opinion I offered. May I, with all respect, encourage you in your future editing, please, to [[WP:CIVIL|be civil]] to other editors, even if you don’t agree with their actions. With friendly regards, [[User:Springnuts|Springnuts]] ([[User talk:Springnuts|talk]]) 06:47, 27 November 2020 (UTC) |
Good morning. I’m sorry you are unhappy with the third opinion I offered. May I, with all respect, encourage you in your future editing, please, to [[WP:CIVIL|be civil]] to other editors, even if you don’t agree with their actions. With friendly regards, [[User:Springnuts|Springnuts]] ([[User talk:Springnuts|talk]]) 06:47, 27 November 2020 (UTC) |
||
Please don't pollute my Talk page with false accusations, [[User:Springnuts|Springnuts]]. I appreciate you taking the time to get involved but the way you go about it is counterproductive. In your third opinion you didn't address the problem that I posted for third opinion. I can't criticize without being accused of something? [[User:Saflieni|Saflieni]] ([[User talk:Saflieni#top|talk]]) 07:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:13, 27 November 2020
Your submission at Articles for creation
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/40px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Maggie Borg, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.m3p.com.mt/wiki/Maggie_Borg.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)Template:Z117 MadmanBot (talk) 12:58, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Saflieni, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting started
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! sciencewatcher (talk) 15:50, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Chronic fatigue syndrome treatment, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. sciencewatcher (talk) 15:51, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- (Your edit added a reference, which is one of the things that is specifically mentioned as being not a minor edit). Don't worry about it - it's not really obvious what exactly a 'minor edit' actually is. --sciencewatcher (talk) 15:53, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Letters to the editor
Hi, I didn't get a reply from you about my question as to whether you wrote any of those letters to the editor. --sciencewatcher (talk) 16:58, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Administrator intervention notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --sciencewatcher (talk) 14:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
The complaint was unwarranted and that discussion is now closed find in favour of Saflieni --Leopardtail (talk) 14:07, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks you for work
Thanks for you recent efforts to improve the quality of the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Treatment page. They are greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leopardtail (talk • contribs) 14:06, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Please be civil
Good morning. I’m sorry you are unhappy with the third opinion I offered. May I, with all respect, encourage you in your future editing, please, to be civil to other editors, even if you don’t agree with their actions. With friendly regards, Springnuts (talk) 06:47, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Please don't pollute my Talk page with false accusations, Springnuts. I appreciate you taking the time to get involved but the way you go about it is counterproductive. In your third opinion you didn't address the problem that I posted for third opinion. I can't criticize without being accused of something? Saflieni (talk) 07:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC)