Joe Decker (talk | contribs) |
Teflon Peter Christ (talk | contribs) →AfD comment: new section |
||
Line 343: | Line 343: | ||
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners|Referencing for beginners]], or ask at the [[Wikipedia:Help desk|help desk]]. Once you have provided at least one [[WP:V#Sources|reliable source]], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Jae Millz|request that it be undeleted|[[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion|request that it be undeleted]]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> [[User:Joe Decker|joe decker]][[User talk:Joe Decker|<sup><small><i>talk to me</i></small></sup>]] 02:32, 25 April 2012 (UTC) |
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see [[Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners|Referencing for beginners]], or ask at the [[Wikipedia:Help desk|help desk]]. Once you have provided at least one [[WP:V#Sources|reliable source]], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Jae Millz|request that it be undeleted|[[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion|request that it be undeleted]]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> [[User:Joe Decker|joe decker]][[User talk:Joe Decker|<sup><small><i>talk to me</i></small></sup>]] 02:32, 25 April 2012 (UTC) |
||
== AfD comment == |
|||
Hi. Would you mind commenting on [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hip pop]]? [[User:Dan56|Dan56]] ([[User talk:Dan56|talk]]) 00:16, 20 May 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:16, 20 May 2012
Template:Archive box collapsible
Official Twitter
Do you see anywhere that has the blue "verified" checkmark that shows twitter verified a celebrity account? I don't. Niteshift36 (talk) 23:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- Well its cause Cashis isn't a noteable enough artist for his twitter to be "verified". Other artists have linked to that twitter when talking about him in their tweets. Example: This source says thats his twitter. STATic message me! 23:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Jerry Lawler
Don't say he no longer wrestles.
No one wrestles every single week.
Ever since the Elimination chamber PPV, Lawler has spent 95% of his time pushing his Wrestlemania match.
He spent one show chasing Cole around the arena, and other show completely off after getting beat down by Jack Swagger.
He's been wrestling about as often as anybody on Raw these days, and Josh Mathews has been doing the bulk of announcing.
He's involved in a big angle at Wrestlemania, and his commentary has been few and far between.
Wait till after Mania. If he fades back into the background with no feuds or angles, then put him in "other talent".
But as long as he's still a featured player with a match to promote at the biggest show of the year, leave him as part of the roster.
Thank You.
Vjmlhds 00:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
We let him on the roster page because he wrestled every week pretty much. Now he hasent wrestled a single match for weeks so he goes back where he belongs. He will wrestle the match at Mania and then fade into the background. He's not a wrestler anymore anyways. STATic message me! 00:47, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
It's been 2 weeks.
The day after the EC PPV, when Cole ran his mouth about Lawler's mother, Jerry challenged him to a WM match.
They've then spent the time since promoting the match, featuring Lawler chasing Cole out of the arena, and Swagger beating down the King.
Even though Lawler hasn't wrestled since the EC PPV, he's had his Mania match booked since the day after the show, and has been doing more stuff with his angle than just sitting back being a commentator.
Wait until after Mania to put him back. As long as he still is more involved as a featured show player, than merely an announcer, he belongs on the main roster.
Remember neither Taker nor HHH has wrestled since they came back, but since they have a Mania match to promote, they went back on the active list.
Same with Lawler.
Vjmlhds 00:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS HHH and Taker are wrestlers and only wrestlers. Lawer on the other hand is a commentator first and a wrestler second at this point in time. STATic message me! 01:02, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
There's 3 Raws to go until Mania.
Don't discount the fact Lawler may wrestle on one if not more of these shows (or maybe even crossover to SD).
Leave Lawler where he is until Mania until everything plays out. Then we'll go from there.
Patience.
Vjmlhds 01:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
1. Could you stop spacing after every sentence. 2. He shouldn't have been there in the first place and theres no reason for him to be there now. You have again violated WP:3RR. STATic message me! 01:09, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Alex Riley 2
Static, he was kayfabe fired. He is unassingned of Raw brand. And he is not on SmackDown, NXT or FCW. He is currently unassingned, but is still a WWE employee. This article should have no spoilers. Please, understand it. He even was removed from Raw roster page on WWE.com. It was not vandalism. Just an improvement to the article. Thanks for the attention. WWEJobber (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- See WP:SPOILER he still only performs on RAW house shows, hes just off television for awhile. He'll most likly be back before Mania to be involved in the Miz v. Cena angle. STATic message me! 22:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- Mikeymike2001 agreed with me so just drop it its 2-1. He is assigned to Raw as he only wrestles Raw house shows. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS: Percy Watson is different as he never appeared on the main roster but A-Ri did for months. STATic message me! 03:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Obie Trice Edit
Where is this so called "labels paragraph" you speak of? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Supergamer345 (talk • contribs) 01:45, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- In this paragraph you can add like two sentances to sum up those unnesasary paragraphs you added. Happy editing. STATic message me! 01:51, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
since when did online mag pieces become reliable sources?
i remove because they do not have sufficient ironclad proof that it's true.and who gave you the power to block me?just curious.blessings,smokie. Smokiewight (talk) 04:34, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Did I say I had the power to block you? No. It has been proven through sources that an instrument of his is gutiar and a genre of his is rock. I know you don't believe so but your just going to have to deal with it. STATic message me! 04:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
RE: Nate Dogg
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- Yes, we base deaths in only one source, just because this source is reliable in an area. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 06:20, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Its a reliable source so the info stays. STATic message me! 06:22, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- It has also been picked up by FOX-TV in Sacramento. Strikerforce (talk) 06:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Exactully. Hes dead dude don't let your personal thoughts get in the way of Wikipedia being built. STATic message me! 06:29, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- In his defense, he does have a valid point about only one primary source reporting the information. I would be cautious, in that regard, but as a member of the media, I know what it takes and what level of certainty must be achieved for a media outlet such as a television station to relay news such as this. But, at this point, I don't really care and am going to stay out of it. The page is protected against all of the IP user junk that was being added, which is pretty much all I care about. Strikerforce (talk) 06:35, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Exactully. Hes dead dude don't let your personal thoughts get in the way of Wikipedia being built. STATic message me! 06:29, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- It has also been picked up by FOX-TV in Sacramento. Strikerforce (talk) 06:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Its a reliable source so the info stays. STATic message me! 06:22, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
D12's Kuniva
As I have reviewed Wikipedia:Notability (music), Kuniva is notable in regards to 7. Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability. Also, fellow member of Shady Records' Cashis has a Wikipedia page of his own with less of a international audience so why is Kuniva not allowed to have one?
http://rapradar.com/2010/08/10/new-mixtape-kuniva-midwest-marauders/
http://www.rapbasement.com/features/features/kuniva-d12-interview.html
http://www.last.fm/music/Kuniva — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErykaMarie (talk • contribs) 22:42, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Cashis has had a notable album. Kuniva, to the best of my knowledge, has not. Strikerforce (talk) 22:54, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
The article you made had slim to no sources in it. Hes just not a noteable artist outside D12 on the other hand Cashis is. STATic message me! 23:27, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
The article that I made was a work in progress and every time I have gone back to it, it was redirected back to the D12 page. But if you are insistent on deleting the page each time I put it up, then I will wait until the end of the year when Kuniva's album comes out and try again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErykaMarie (talk • contribs) 03:25, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- You can create it at User:ErykaMarie/Kuniva and move it to article space when you have reliable sources to back up his noteability. STATic message me! 03:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
In the future, I would like to advise you to make that suggestion to users before deleting their work with zero explanation. It can become extremely frustrating to all parties if I am trying to contribute to the site and you are deleting it. At one point, I had begun to list sources but as I stated the page was redirected to the D12 page AGAIN. As stated before, I will wait until he has a "notable" artist with a "notable" album released to avoid this back and forth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErykaMarie (talk • contribs) 03:32, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- There is a tag (the Wiki markup for it escapes me at this very second) that you can place on an article that is in development that will let new page patrollers and other editors know that it is an article in progress and that it should be given a chance to develop prior to being hit with a CSD or other deletion tag... just FYI. Strikerforce (talk) 03:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- I did give a "explanation." He is not noteable as a solo artist unlike Eminem, Proof and Kon Artis. He's refered to as D12's Kuniva where Eminem, Proof and Kon Artis are known out side of just the group. STATic message me! 03:35, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Kon Artis is NOT known as a solo artist. He is known as a producer under the name, Mr. Porter. And he is not known regularly billed as D12's Kuniva. I appreciate the feedback from both of you. Have a great one. (ErykaMarie (talk) 03:40, 17 March 2011 (UTC))
Nate Dogg
I was going to leave you a warning just like you left me one, but I saw you had this note in your editnotice: "I'm not a vandal and I'm not new, so please don't slap me with a generic "Welcome to Wikipedia" warning template. If you have a concern about my edits, I would prefer you leave me a message in your own words."
Instead of calling you a hypocrite, I'll just tell you that the information was in a source already in the article, after the sentence I edited. It's the BBC one, in fact. So, please try to check the sources before assuming bad faith and templating me, because that just tempts me to template you back.
Cheers, /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 01:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, first threatening someone is not the way to solve your problems. Second, if you read most sources the reason for his death is unknown, we can ussume it was complications but that doesn't make it true. WP:BLP. STATic message me! 01:31, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, the problem is now caused by BBC changing their article a few minutes ago, because I just refreshed the page. Before, they attributed it to the strokes. Secondly, [1] still says "died Tuesday night after a long health battle in the wake of strokes in 2007 and 2008. He was 41." I agree it's now not definitive, but if you search Google News the cached blurb still says "US hip-hop star Nate Dogg, who worked with Snoop Dogg, Warren G and Eminem, has died at the age of 41. Lawyer Mark Geragos told the Associated Press news agency that the singer died as a result of complications from two strokes he suffered in recent ..." so at the time of my edit, it was perfectly fine. Also, ABC (Australia), Vanity Fair, New Jersey Star-Ledger, et al. are saying the same thing. I will add those in as sources.
- As for you claim that I am threatening you, I'd simply like you to play by your own rules and not template a regular. This happened to me a few days ago and it's just disgusting because people don't bother to talk or look things up anymore. I'm sorry if I offended you but I feel offended as well, you know. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 01:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Well sorry I don't take the time to look at your contributions to see if you've been here a long time. I see a random change that violates WP:BLP so I revert it. Considering your edit summary was just "reason". STATic message me! 01:45, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- So you're holding others to a higher standard with your "I'm not a vandal and I'm not new, so please don't slap me with a generic "Welcome to Wikipedia" warning template. If you have a concern about my edits, I would prefer you leave me a message in your own words" message? I'm really confused now. Blindly reverting edits without checking them out isn't always a good idea, but I understand where you're coming from in this case (which was BBC's fault). I just don't appreciate you telling others not to template you when you can't even be bothered to see who I am and just go ahead with templating me. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 01:48, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Was the templating a mistake for you? Yes. No reason to get all hurt over it. STATic message me! 01:51, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- FWIW, this entire thread is a good example of why automated tools can be a bad thing, sometimes. Static, are you aware that you templated an administrator? Rather amusing, to me. Strikerforce (talk) 01:53, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, haha, funny. If you bothered to see what actully happened you'd understand. Also I didn't used any tools so I don't know what your talking about. Don't bother to comment on MY issues if you don't get your facts straight. STATic message me! 01:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Strikerforce, perhaps you should be doing some fact-checking now, too? The page history, for one. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:03, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Goodness, you're both a little jumpy. Most "don't template the regulars" mistakes typically happen via the use of Twinkle or Huggle, which is why I made the statement that I did. I made an improper conclusion when I saw the issue that was being discussed. My point about how I found it amusing that an administrator got templated was why I posted, but in hindsight, I could have either stayed out of it or approached it differently. No need to get worked up, guys. SMILE! This is, after all, supposed to be enjoyable, right? Strikerforce (talk) 02:09, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Strikerforce, perhaps you should be doing some fact-checking now, too? The page history, for one. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:03, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, haha, funny. If you bothered to see what actully happened you'd understand. Also I didn't used any tools so I don't know what your talking about. Don't bother to comment on MY issues if you don't get your facts straight. STATic message me! 01:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- STATicVerseatide, thanks for this. I know I overreacted a little but I was just kind of overexcited. A cup of tea all around and back to working on articles! :) /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:12, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- Cheers :) STATic message me! 02:37, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Be careful....
...you are approaching 3 reverts on Euthanasia LP. —GFOLEY FOUR— 03:14, 19 March 2011 (UTC) Struck at 03:28, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- No im not I only have one revert in the last 24-48 hours. STATic message me! 03:24, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Trouted
Hey, I saw you trouted User:Gfoley4. I was wondering if you could trout me, as I like trout. Thanks, Rsteilberg 23:24, 19 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsteilberg (talk • contribs)
Civil
I do not why you are telling me to be civil. If you mean Live on Raw being capatilized, I see no harm in that. Intoronto1125 (talk) 02:20, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- What do you mean? You told me to be civil and i explained my case. Who gave you the right to put the convo back on my page? I have the right to remove stuff of my talk page if I like. Intoronto1125 (talk) 02:50, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Incase you didn't notice anything past the first sentence that wasent the point of it. "When you add info to articles you must provide a reliable source(s). It doesn't matter if you know its true it needs to be sourced. [Some people http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WrestleMania_XXVII&curid=22482199&diff=420074642&oldid=420072834] have that ability." <----Thats the point. STATic message me! 03:06, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ok I understood that part, but I do not understand why that is considered uncivil. Intoronto1125 (talk) 04:12, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Using all caps is pretty uncivil YELLING OVER THE INTERNET doesn't get any problems solved. STATic message me! 04:15, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't mean it to be offensive or anything like that sorry! Intoronto1125 (talk) 04:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Using all caps is pretty uncivil YELLING OVER THE INTERNET doesn't get any problems solved. STATic message me! 04:15, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ok I understood that part, but I do not understand why that is considered uncivil. Intoronto1125 (talk) 04:12, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
A-Ri
You are contradicting yourself. If A-Ri wrestles on live events to get a contract is because he is unassigned. If he were assigned, he would not need to get a contract. And, in fact, he never wins these matches, so he never gets assigned. And if he just do this on Raw events, it is because he wants to be assigned to the Raw brand, not SmackDown. It is so simple. WWEJobber (talk) 03:32, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Well he just returned tonight like I have said he would so you no longer have an argument for change. STATic message me! 03:36, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
WWEJobber erased your warning
I was about to talk to WWEJobber on his talk page when I noticed he erased your warning message. I'm guessing he doesn't like having being corrected. Can you do something about it?--Mikeymike2001 (talk) 03:52, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Per WP:BLANKING he can remove anything from his talk page he wants except certain things (block notices and other things). People into vandalism/disruption ussually don't like being corrected but if I see him disrupt the WWE personnel template again im reporting him. STATic message me! 03:57, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Reply
Thanks for offering to help. Here are the pages right now that he is reverting my edits on.
World Wrestling Entertainment
Florida Championship Wrestling
List of World Wrestling Entertainment personnel
Template:World Wrestling Entertainment employees
List of current champions in World Wrestling Entertainment
WWE Diva
Rosa Mendes
I agree, those of us who he is reverting to vandalize, we should all report him. Thanks again I appreciate it. Wrestling0101 (talk) 03:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
WP:UPNOT
Why did you erase the contents of my Talk page??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.188.120.194 (talk) 07:00, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Read WP:UPNOT. Your talk pge is for messages not you promoting some album by s not noteable artist. STATic message me! 14:22, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Singer, first and foremost? "Only called a "rapper" only due to racism in mainstream media". I strongly disagree with the first and the second is original research, at best. You've been around here long enough to know not to bring agendas into articles and that is really what it looks like you've done here. Please start a discussion on the talk page about the issue and let's get a consensus. Strikerforce (talk) 21:42, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Im not bring an agenda, He sings in all his songs have you ever heard him spit a 16? No because he's not a rapper. I bet if The-Dream died right now they would refer to him as a rapper due to his hip hop contributions. STATic message me! 21:47, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- If we're really looking into our crystal balls here, I'd put money on him being referred to as a producer. In regard to Nate Dogg, how familiar are you with his earliest material? Rap, by the very definition of the word. Regardless, please start a discussion thread and establish a consensus. "Only called a "rapper" only due to racism in mainstream media" screams "agenda", to me.Strikerforce (talk) 21:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Just stating facts with that statement. STATic message me! 22:04, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- No, you are stating an opinion. Can you show me a citation from a reliable source that he was "only called a 'rapper' due to racism in mainstream media"? Strikerforce (talk) 22:07, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Wow the conversation is over could you stop trolling. STATic message me! 22:09, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm attempting to have a legitimate conversation with you in regard to a concern on an article... and because I challenged you to prove a statement that you are attempting to use as a basis for your wishes on said article, you blue link me to a policy, calling me a troll? Way to assume good faith and be civil, Static. Strikerforce (talk) 22:12, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm letting you have your way. I really don't care, im more focused on fighting vandalism and building articles then arguing over one word in one article. I really don't have the time for it. STATic message me! 22:15, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Don't you mean "Fighting vandalism, building articles, and deleting other people's comments on talk pages"? If you disagree with a statement on a talk page, why don't you have the guts to dispute it? Nobody appointed you the arbiter of what belongs on talk pages. XP84 (talk) 20:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- We don't call others "copyright nazis" around here. Also, consider this a warning not to attack or harass others, like calling another person a douchebag; I have no problem issuing blocks (and I am sure no other administrator here would) if that continues. –MuZemike 20:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- Don't you mean "Fighting vandalism, building articles, and deleting other people's comments on talk pages"? If you disagree with a statement on a talk page, why don't you have the guts to dispute it? Nobody appointed you the arbiter of what belongs on talk pages. XP84 (talk) 20:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm letting you have your way. I really don't care, im more focused on fighting vandalism and building articles then arguing over one word in one article. I really don't have the time for it. STATic message me! 22:15, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm attempting to have a legitimate conversation with you in regard to a concern on an article... and because I challenged you to prove a statement that you are attempting to use as a basis for your wishes on said article, you blue link me to a policy, calling me a troll? Way to assume good faith and be civil, Static. Strikerforce (talk) 22:12, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Wow the conversation is over could you stop trolling. STATic message me! 22:09, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- No, you are stating an opinion. Can you show me a citation from a reliable source that he was "only called a 'rapper' due to racism in mainstream media"? Strikerforce (talk) 22:07, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Just stating facts with that statement. STATic message me! 22:04, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- If we're really looking into our crystal balls here, I'd put money on him being referred to as a producer. In regard to Nate Dogg, how familiar are you with his earliest material? Rap, by the very definition of the word. Regardless, please start a discussion thread and establish a consensus. "Only called a "rapper" only due to racism in mainstream media" screams "agenda", to me.Strikerforce (talk) 21:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
The banner
No, I didn't remove your banner. I don't care what you do on your own page, but if you are really interested, there is a very long discussion of those joke banners here. Sorry if you've already seen it. Krashlandon (talk) 18:13, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
About the music image.....
Execuse me dude, I did put it as non free pic and I used the purpose of use.Also the rational fair use.Why"d you have to revert it?--Damirgraffiti ☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 23:37, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have no idea what image your talking about? STATic message me! 01:10, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- The image on the article that I uploaded and placed it on this I need A doctor.Why did you revert it?I read your edit summary, and it said it was not free use but I did place the non free copyright tag and you still removed it.Why?Here's proof:
Why?--Damirgraffiti ☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 01:44, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Because if non-free Music video screenshots are to be used in an article it must be to greatly to improve the article and that image really doesn't improve the article. STATic message me! 03:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, ok!Just delete this file and I"ll find a better music video pic to improve the article.Could"ve uploaded other music video screenshots that helps improve.--Damirgraffiti ☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 03:19, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Why do you keep removing my production credit off of Nipsey Hussle's "The Marathon" mixtape?
I produced track #1 entitled "Love?". You can even check Pmpworldwide.com/Arsenix for a reference. (TheHighStandard (talk) 06:59, 13 April 2011 (UTC))— Preceding unsigned comment added by TheHighStandard (talk • contribs) 06:54, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
- You need a reliable source to back up that, Pimpworldwide.com is not that. STATic message me! 13:57, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Do you even know what PmpWorldwide.com is? (Not Pimpworldwide lol), How is that not a reliable source? They check and verify all placements before they put them on their main page. And my voice tag is even at the beginning of the "Love?" track! "You are listening to a High Standard Production ..." If the track itself isn't a reliable source, then I just don't know what to tell you lol. (TheHighStandard (talk) 16:35, 13 April 2011 (UTC))
How come an article with references such as Tha Carter IV not meet WP:NALBUMS? WayneSlam 00:23, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- Beacause there was only one reliable source from this year! It could be noteable but the recent versions have not been. STATic message me! 00:32, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
FINAL WARNING?
I was just inquiring about the last warning you sent me. I was sourcing some of the tracks that were said to be unsourced. I was wondering how that was disrupting wikipedia?
BiggKhrisco (talk) 04:59, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- You added some sourced but more unsourced. STATic message me! 05:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Okay, but why am I getting a warning for disruption? I am not disrupting, I'm just helping. Also, why were some of the tracks that were sourced deleted? BiggKhrisco (talk) 06:49, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) You should not have received a warning for disruption. I looked at your edits to the article in question and saw nothing that warranted a warning. As such, I have struck the warning on your talk page and commented there. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 08:10, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by BiggKhrisco (talk • contribs) 09:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Strickerforce will you please GTFO! Khrisco it was disruption as you added a bunch or unsourced info. See WP:V. STATic message me! 19:18, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Unsourced, yes, but not crossing the line of "disruption". A "last warning" was inappropriate. A -2 warning might have been appropriate, but not a -4. The user's edits were an attempt to be constructive, add to the encyclopedia, and did not cross the line into vandalism. As such, there were better ways to approach the situation. The number of consistent users on Wikipedia is declining and we should be encouraging content creation, not being overly hard on those who make a simple mistake.
- By the way, since you appear to like to quote policies, might I point you to AGF and CIVIL, both of which you have violated in one form or another in almost every interaction with me? StrikerforceTalk Review me! 21:13, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- He had already been given two warnings that are in his talk page history and in another case of vandalism I didn't have the time to warn him so this is the forth time i've personally caught vandalism by him recently so 4th warning was deserved. STATic message me! 23:14, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Your request for Editor Review
I have reviewed you, as per your request at Wikipedia:Editor review/STATicVerseatide 2. I hope this helps. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:49, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
You have new messages
I LOL'd. Nice thing to have on your userpage. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:55, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- Im glad someone apritiates it haha. STATic message me! 00:57, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:TheKickbackCALISWAGDISTRICT.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TheKickbackCALISWAGDISTRICT.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 23 May 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive-->
to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:48, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Hustle hard.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hustle hard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:VictoryDJKhaledBackCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:VictoryDJKhaledBackCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Check Out Wiz Khalifa's Page Now!
They put T-Pain in and that wasn't my edit! So now you know T-Pain is an associated act of Wiz Khalifa. RobertRay45821 (talk) 11:30, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
And I removed him cause hes not. Easy as that. STATic message me! 00:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- T-Pain as an associated act of Wiz? That's funny. I can't even imagine the trainwreck. StrikerforceTalk Review me! 02:49, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:TheDeAndreWay.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TheDeAndreWay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:02, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
I want to be adopted!
I am also interested in making and editing music articles (mostly hip-hop) so I thought you would be a good adopter for me. MiguelFHM (talk) 21:07, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Kanye West proposal
Hello. I'm proposing a WikiProject Kanye West at WikiProject Council/Proposals/Kanye West. Would you mind taking the time to vote there? Put your name in the Support section if you think he deserves one.
Kanyewest1123 (talk) 09:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Removing Maintained template on Recovery
Hi Statis
Since it appears you are on a longish wikibreak, I'm going to remove the {{Maintained}}
template from the Recovery discussion page. I hope (and assume) that'd be cool with you. Hope you're well. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 22:11, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Re: Davis100
I noticed on Davis100's talkpage, you had warned him numerous times about his vandalism and since your warning he has continued to vandalize pages with no signs of it ending. It's fairly obvious it's a vandalism only account, so may I suggest a permanent ban of Davis? Live and Die 4 Hip Hop (talk) 05:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Join My group.
--GH200 (talk) 01:22, 31 October 2011 (UTC) You have been invited to join the group called the changers go to the page User:GH200/The Changers and check it out and put your name down as a member I like your work and please even if you dont want to please respond anyway. I dont have anyone else in the group but me so tell other people about it especially new editors. Please and Thak you.--GH200 (talk) 01:22, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Rucka Rucka Ali AfD
Hello! I've submitted Rucka Rucka Ali to AfD because I can't see any third-party evidence for notability: the one citation given appears to be user-submitted content, sourced from the subject's own YouTube channel. -- The Anome (talk) 11:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of I'm Black, You're White & These Are Clearly Parodies for deletion
I've put I'm Black, You're White & These Are Clearly Parodies up for deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Black, You're White & These Are Clearly Parodies -- The Anome (talk) 17:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
I'd like a good trout
It's been awhile. I feel that a good trouting is necessary and in order. Thanks, —Rsteilberg talk 00:51, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
The article Jae Millz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe deckertalk to me 02:32, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
AfD comment
Hi. Would you mind commenting on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hip pop? Dan56 (talk) 00:16, 20 May 2012 (UTC)