MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) →ArbCom 2019 election voter message: new section Tag: |
François Robere (talk | contribs) →ARCA?: new section |
||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
</table> |
</table> |
||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=926750323 --> |
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=926750323 --> |
||
== ARCA? == |
|||
Hey SQL, |
|||
Who's monitoring ARCA at the moment, of the clerks? There are two discussion there at the moment that touch on the sourcing restriction from [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in_Poland]]. While there's certainly a lot of support for a sourcing restriction, there are some edge cases that need to be sorted out (see for example [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Statement_by_Nigel_Ish Nigel Ish's comment]). I'd like to suggest having an [[WT:AE]] discussion so editors can come up with a satisfactory definition of "allowed sources", which will then be fed back to ARCA for approval. [[User:François Robere|François Robere]] ([[User talk:François Robere|talk]]) 20:41, 19 November 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:41, 19 November 2019
ANI thread
Hi SQL. For info, I've posted this at ANI, as you have posted on the talkpage of the user in question. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 15:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Textus Receptus
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Textus Receptus. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Tech News: 2019-47
20:17, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
ARCA?
Hey SQL,
Who's monitoring ARCA at the moment, of the clerks? There are two discussion there at the moment that touch on the sourcing restriction from Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in_Poland. While there's certainly a lot of support for a sourcing restriction, there are some edge cases that need to be sorted out (see for example Nigel Ish's comment). I'd like to suggest having an WT:AE discussion so editors can come up with a satisfactory definition of "allowed sources", which will then be fed back to ARCA for approval. François Robere (talk) 20:41, 19 November 2019 (UTC)