Content deleted Content added
→Abu badali: comment |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::::If you think it's inappropriate for an outside party to criticize your use of admin tools, then you shouldn't be trusted with admin tools. – [[User:Quadell|Quadell]] <sup>([[User_talk:Quadell|talk]]) ([[Special:Random|random]])</sup> 05:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC) |
::::If you think it's inappropriate for an outside party to criticize your use of admin tools, then you shouldn't be trusted with admin tools. – [[User:Quadell|Quadell]] <sup>([[User_talk:Quadell|talk]]) ([[Special:Random|random]])</sup> 05:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::::I do not think it's appropriate for he to have interjected as he did, when there was already a discussion brought up that I was reacting to in a civil manner. He brought the incivility to my talk page.—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] (<font color="gold">竜龍</font>) 05:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC) |
:::::I do not think it's appropriate for he to have interjected as he did, when there was already a discussion brought up that I was reacting to in a civil manner. He brought the incivility to my talk page.—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] (<font color="gold">竜龍</font>) 05:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC) |
||
::::::Personally, I think Ryulong was remarkably civil and he was quite correct to tell Abu badali to get lost. Abu has a vested interest in defending people who use contrib histories to harass. There's a difference between being open to criticism from outside parties and letting someone with an axe to grind soapbox. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:WJBscribe|'''WjB''']][[User talk:WJBscribe|scribe]]</span> 05:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== thank you can you help me put it == |
== thank you can you help me put it == |
Revision as of 05:31, 29 July 2007
When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion.—Ryūlóng
Abu badali
Your remark to Abu badali here was uncivil and uncalled for. You owe him an apology. – Quadell (talk) (random) 05:04, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- He got involved in a dispute that he had no reason to do so.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:05, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- He had as much reason to get involved as you did. – Quadell (talk) (random) 05:13, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- I blocked someone who was not him. There was no reason for him to get involved.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- If you think it's inappropriate for an outside party to criticize your use of admin tools, then you shouldn't be trusted with admin tools. – Quadell (talk) (random) 05:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- I do not think it's appropriate for he to have interjected as he did, when there was already a discussion brought up that I was reacting to in a civil manner. He brought the incivility to my talk page.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- Personally, I think Ryulong was remarkably civil and he was quite correct to tell Abu badali to get lost. Abu has a vested interest in defending people who use contrib histories to harass. There's a difference between being open to criticism from outside parties and letting someone with an axe to grind soapbox. WjBscribe 05:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- I do not think it's appropriate for he to have interjected as he did, when there was already a discussion brought up that I was reacting to in a civil manner. He brought the incivility to my talk page.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- If you think it's inappropriate for an outside party to criticize your use of admin tools, then you shouldn't be trusted with admin tools. – Quadell (talk) (random) 05:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- I blocked someone who was not him. There was no reason for him to get involved.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- He had as much reason to get involved as you did. – Quadell (talk) (random) 05:13, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thank you can you help me put it
Thank you very much for your message suddenly seem to a forgeten how to put it.Can you help me put it.Put it today's page ?Harlowraman 05:10, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- There's a link on the AFD template in the article that you should have tagged.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC)