Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on 2014 Peshawar school attack. (TW) |
→December 2014: Also alerting Tag: contentious topics alert |
||
Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2014_Peshawar_school_attack&diff=638467227&oldid=638466542] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2014_Peshawar_school_attack&diff=638462828&oldid=638462755] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2014_Peshawar_school_attack&diff=638460277&oldid=638459841] It would be a good idea to stop reverting random editors and get them to use the talkpage along with you...''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:TopGun|<b style="color:#060">lTopGunl</b>]] ([[User talk:TopGun|<b style="color:#000">talk</b>]])</span> 08:17, 17 December 2014 (UTC) |
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2014_Peshawar_school_attack&diff=638467227&oldid=638466542] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2014_Peshawar_school_attack&diff=638462828&oldid=638462755] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2014_Peshawar_school_attack&diff=638460277&oldid=638459841] It would be a good idea to stop reverting random editors and get them to use the talkpage along with you...''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:TopGun|<b style="color:#060">lTopGunl</b>]] ([[User talk:TopGun|<b style="color:#000">talk</b>]])</span> 08:17, 17 December 2014 (UTC) |
||
{{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:''' |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding [[India]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Afghanistan]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan|here]]. |
|||
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|||
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> --<span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:TopGun|<b style="color:#060">lTopGunl</b>]] ([[User talk:TopGun|<b style="color:#000">talk</b>]])</span> 08:18, 17 December 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:19, 17 December 2014
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Titanic (1997 film)
Hello, why you revert my edit? something wrong? paryvartalk 10:31, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Paryvar: Yes, something is wrong with the edit. Please avoid using peacock terms, weasel words and read the Manual of style. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Sound is like a joke! eleven Oscar or multi billion dollar mark doesn't meaning rare! have fun bot! paryvartalk 10:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, @Paryvar:, let it sound like a joke. If you have issues bring it to the talk page of the article (Talk:Titanic (1997 film). Also, please maintain civility on talk pages, calling me a bot isn't going to help in any way. Just because we have a difference in opinion, it doesn't make you or me superior to the other. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:44, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Sound is like a joke! eleven Oscar or multi billion dollar mark doesn't meaning rare! have fun bot! paryvartalk 10:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:St. Francis Dam
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:St. Francis Dam. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Administrators/RfC for an Admin Review Board
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Administrators/RfC for an Admin Review Board. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:11, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Terrorism
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Terrorism. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 December 2014
- Op-ed: It's GLAM up North!
- Traffic report: Dead Black Men and Science Fiction
- Featured content: Honour him, love and obey? Good idea with military leaders.
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:50, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Bhushi Dam
Mike V • Talk 19:30, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- TING! --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:31, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Windy Corner, Isle of Man
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Windy Corner, Isle of Man. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2014)
A plate of spaghetti and meatballs.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Game design • Mexico–United States border Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:22, 15 December 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Charles Fahy
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Charles Fahy. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Saffron Terror
Hi, can you explain me your stand here. You want it to be renamed to Hindu extremism ? -sarvajna (talk) 07:39, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- It would be difficult for me to explain you, because I don't know you. However, jokes apart, what explaining do I need to do? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:51, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- I wanted to know whether you want the article to be renamed as "Hindu Extremism"? -sarvajna (talk) 07:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- That depends on what consensus says. -_Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:02, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
- I wanted to know whether you want the article to be renamed as "Hindu Extremism"? -sarvajna (talk) 07:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
Your recent editing history at 2014 Peshawar school attack shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
[1] [2] [3] It would be a good idea to stop reverting random editors and get them to use the talkpage along with you... lTopGunl (talk) 08:17, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Template:Z33 --lTopGunl (talk) 08:18, 17 December 2014 (UTC)