→Warning: It is depressing that editors as otherwise intelligent as you two are just as lazy as the rest of the admin corps |
HalfShadow (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
:::::How terribly entertaining that you call it a tantrum. Yet another utterly useless admin. Tell me, do any of you actually have any interest in dealing with the real problem? |
:::::How terribly entertaining that you call it a tantrum. Yet another utterly useless admin. Tell me, do any of you actually have any interest in dealing with the real problem? |
||
:::::I thought not. How pathetic. → [[User:Roux|<span style="color:#6D351A;font-size:80%;">'''ROUX'''</span>]] [[User talk:Roux|<span style="color:#6D351A;">'''₪'''</span>]]<small> 16:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)</small> |
:::::I thought not. How pathetic. → [[User:Roux|<span style="color:#6D351A;font-size:80%;">'''ROUX'''</span>]] [[User talk:Roux|<span style="color:#6D351A;">'''₪'''</span>]]<small> 16:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)</small> |
||
*I'm not an admin. I am, however, ''smarter than you''. If you don't want to have anything to do with another user, ''ignore them''. You didn't. See how that worked out? [[User:HalfShadow|<font color="gray">'''Half'''</font>]][[User talk:HalfShadow|<font color="black">'''Shadow'''</font>]] 16:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:59, 8 February 2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Welcome backWelcome back to the project Roux. — Coffee // have a cup // ark // 09:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC) ;) Jack Merridew 09:08, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
← You won't leave again, will you? :P fetchcomms☛ 01:49, 5 February 2010 (UTC) *Surreptitious wave* Gonzonoir (talk) 10:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC) Edit on VPI've had this happen to me before. If you want, request a CheckUser. If you want any insurance, I won't run for adminship. I was planning to do so when I graduated from college (9 years in the future). I'll just sit around Wikipedia making good edits as a normal user. Sorry for [edit] Buggie111 (talk) 18:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC) Trout
Anyway thought I'd drop you a note because I've found ignoring WP:PEOPLE WHO ANNOY ME tremendously effective. I just took a look at my December talk page archive and found a bunch of warnings/messages/junk I just ignored. Nothing happened to me afterwards and I'd totally forgotten about most of them. And a couple of the annoying people annoyed others and eventually got themselves blocked anyway. Life is good. If just one person accuses you of something and no one else adds backs them up, it just don't get any traction. Hope this helps. (and I'm emailing you another tidbit) Gerardw (talk) 01:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC) Fuck you all.Yup! It's perfectly okay for an editor to call me a liar. That's fine and dandy! Woe betide anyone who gets pissed off at having their integrity--the only commodity we have on this site--impugned. So, go fuck yourselves. → ROUX ₪ 16:45, 8 February 2010 (UTC) WarningI'm not going to block you, but this crosses the line and then some. Without commenting on the situation at hand, if you comment like that again to another editor then you'll be blocked. Please take time to think about your edits before hitting save. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 16:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
|