Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk | contribs) →List of Islamic Terror Attacks and ARBPIA: new section |
Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
== List of Islamic Terror Attacks and ARBPIA == |
== List of Islamic Terror Attacks and ARBPIA == |
||
You can't remove stuff from the article talk page that is a legitimate discussion of article content. See [[WP:TPO]]. You can't call legitimate discussion of article content vandalism. It isn't. See [[WP:NOT VANDALISM]]. You can't call editors vandals and apologists when you have no evidence for it. See [[WP:WIAPA]]. |
You can't remove stuff from the article talk page that is a legitimate discussion of article content. See [[WP:TPO]]. You can't call legitimate discussion of article content vandalism. It isn't. See [[WP:NOT VANDALISM]]. You can't call editors vandals and apologists when you have no evidence for it. See [[WP:WIAPA]]. That article is under the sanctions covered by the arbcom case explained in the template below. Please familiarize yourself with the behavior of editors expected on articles covered before you get yourself into a fix. |
||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
| As a result of [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles|an arbitration case]], broad [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|editing restrictions]] apply to all pages broadly related the [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Area of conflict|Arab-Israeli conflict]]. These sanctions are described at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision]] and a brief summary is included below: |
|||
*Any uninvolved administrator may, at their own discretion, impose sanctions on editors working in the area of conflict who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], satisfy any [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standard of behavior]], or follow any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. |
|||
*Possible sanctions include [[WP:Block|blocks]], [[WP:BAN#Types of ban|bans]] and other [[WP:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]]. |
|||
*A ''one [[Help:Reverting|revert]] per twenty-four hours [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#Other revert rules|restriction]]'' applies to articles broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, editors may be blocked without warning if they breach this restriction. See [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#General 1RR restriction|here]] for more information. |
|||
Sanctions may only be imposed after the user is notified sanctions are in effect. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; but is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.<p> |
|||
| Ambox warning blue.svg |
|||
| icon size = 50px}} |
|||
— [[User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah|alf laylah wa laylah]] ([[User_talk:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah|talk]]) 12:09, 18 April 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:10, 18 April 2014
Rim sim, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
Hi Rim sim!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there! This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:38, 13 December 2013 (UTC) |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 06:39, Saturday, May 25, 2024 (UTC)
March 2014
Hello, I'm Raghusri. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 1: Nenokkadine without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Raghusri 11:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Islamic terrorist attacks may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *{{flagicon|Pakistan}} 19 January 2014 - [[Bannu]], [[Pakistan]. 22 local soldiers are killed and 30 are injured in an attack by Sunni's.<ref>http://www.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
New User
i'm new to wikipedia--can you provide some tips for easy editing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rim Sim (talk • contribs) 12:01, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is often not straightforwards but there is a good starting point by reading the links on Help:Getting started. I notice that you are interested in editing some topics related to "islamic genocide". Just note that any edit made on a subject like this, where people will have very strong opinions, must be verifyable to a reliable source. Just one other note - when leaving comments on talk pages please remember to put ~~~~ after your text. This will leave a link to your talk page and a date stamp like the end of this comment - Peripitus (Talk) 21:54, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Islamic terrorist attacks, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Somali, Bayda and Amran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Islamic terrorist attacks may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- suicide bombing]], [[Jerusalem]]. 15 dead <ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1483492.stm]] |tIsrael stunned by Jerusalem blast|BBC Thursday, 9 August, 2001</ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:00, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello Rim sim, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Ram Janmabhoomi has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SMS Talk 19:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Vanamonde93. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ayodhya dispute seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vanamonde93 (talk) 19:53, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
List of Islamic Terror Attacks and ARBPIA
You can't remove stuff from the article talk page that is a legitimate discussion of article content. See WP:TPO. You can't call legitimate discussion of article content vandalism. It isn't. See WP:NOT VANDALISM. You can't call editors vandals and apologists when you have no evidence for it. See WP:WIAPA. That article is under the sanctions covered by the arbcom case explained in the template below. Please familiarize yourself with the behavior of editors expected on articles covered before you get yourself into a fix.
As a result of an arbitration case, broad editing restrictions apply to all pages broadly related the Arab-Israeli conflict. These sanctions are described at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and a brief summary is included below:
- Any uninvolved administrator may, at their own discretion, impose sanctions on editors working in the area of conflict who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process.
- Possible sanctions include blocks, bans and other editing restrictions.
- A one revert per twenty-four hours restriction applies to articles broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, editors may be blocked without warning if they breach this restriction. See here for more information.
— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 12:09, 18 April 2014 (UTC)