→Citation!: Whoops |
117.220.145.234 (talk) →Transistor: new section |
||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
:Hmm, that's a good point. Go ahead and remove it. Also, just as a quick side note, you can sign your name after posting something on a talk page by typing four tildes -- <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> -- after your message. At the moment the automated bot is signing them all for you. I get the feeling that your talk page might get spammed by an angry bot at some point ;) – '''''[[User:Richard BB|<font color="#8000FF">Richard</font>]] [[User talk:Richard BB|<font color="#8000FF">BB</font>]]''''' 12:37, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
:Hmm, that's a good point. Go ahead and remove it. Also, just as a quick side note, you can sign your name after posting something on a talk page by typing four tildes -- <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> -- after your message. At the moment the automated bot is signing them all for you. I get the feeling that your talk page might get spammed by an angry bot at some point ;) – '''''[[User:Richard BB|<font color="#8000FF">Richard</font>]] [[User talk:Richard BB|<font color="#8000FF">BB</font>]]''''' 12:37, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Transistor == |
|||
I have reverted your revert on the transistor page. I felt it was counter-constructive. |
|||
The next time you touch my edits, do it after you get my permission. |
|||
Amanbir Singh. |
Revision as of 14:05, 17 October 2012
|
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.(Masanori Asami (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2012 (UTC))
Hi there. Which discussion is it? If it is the "nationalistic disruption" discussion, I am already aware (though am not actually involved with the issue itself). Thanks for letting me know, either way! – Richard BB 14:44, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Disruptive User
this user, who has been blocked before for genre warring on a different ip address http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/108.64.173.242 keeps changing genres, please keep an eye on him I call the big one bitey (talk) October 10, 2012 19:42 (UTC)
V Empire
Hey dude. What on earth have you done? I can't even figure it out. All the history has gone and it's up for speedy deletion! Cardinal Wurzel (talk) 09:35, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I've really messed it up (this is what you get from editing too early in the morning). Basically, someone moved the article to Vempire again. I went to move it back, but accidentally moved it to V empire, rather than V Empire. Either way, it's irrelevant because it can't be moved back to V Empire without the redirect being speedily deleted. So, once it's deleted, I'll move it back to V Empire, redirect both V empire and Vempire to it, and request that it be move-locked so we don't have to do this again. Unfortunately, I've made a real pig's ear of it all... but I think I have it right now. – Richard BB 09:41, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Haha, I see! I was trying to follow the trail but I got lost! To be honest, while we're here, this might be a good opportunity to change the title anyway, because it shouldn't actually have the brackets. The CD booklet (and the spine) has "V Empire or Dark Faerytales in Phallustein". Shall we go with that? I didn't realise you could request a move lock. That's a good idea. Cardinal Wurzel (talk) 10:32, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- In hindsight, it might indeed be better to go without the brackets. Does The Gospel of Filth use the brackets? Afterall, we're going off that for the overall title. If so, I'll go ahead and make the change, make the appropriate redirects, and then request a move lock. And yeah, I'm not surprised it was difficult to follow. Today I've completely failed on WP:CIR, it seems! – Richard BB 10:47, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Nope, no brackets in The Gospel of Filth either, so I think we can call that "official". I don't even know what WP:CIR is, so you're doing better than me! I'll click the link and learn something... Cardinal Wurzel (talk) 10:56, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Great, this makes things much easier. I'll clean it up now. Cheers! – Richard BB 10:56, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, I have another quick, pedantic point. Should the "O" in "Or" be capitalised? Normally convention says that it shouldn't. Thoughts? – Richard BB 10:58, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
I think it shouldn't be - it isn't on the sleeve or in TGOF. Small O for 'or', small I for 'in'. Cardinal Wurzel (talk) 11:28, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Bishop George Ahr High School
Regarding recent edits to the Bishop Ahr Wikipedia page:
While I appreciate that you had changed the title from "Incident" to "Controversy" - I still submit to you that this line (and especially with it's own header) has no place in an article that is simply about the institution/building.
The incident in question is related to an individual, and since the event was not notable in the formational history of the school it is biased and unfair to include it as its own header.
I also submit that other local institutions have had similar articles removed by the same token. A precedent has been established, and while it is unfortunate, it would be more appropriate on a "list of NJ sexual offenses" or some list seperate from an institutional page. Jcullinan (talk) 15:09, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for contacting me. The first point I'll say is that I'm not interested in getting into an edit war here, so I won't take up this issue to vehemently. I reverted the section back mostly because I felt its removal was unjustified. However, as I said, I won't vehemently defend that position, should you disagree with me. Instead, however, I feel it ought to be discussed. There are relevant discussions open both on the article's talk page and on the AN/I link which was posted on your talk page. However, as a second point, I'd say that it could be argued (not necessarily by me, but by those who placed it there in the first place) that the incident is notable. I haven't looked enough into it to decide myself if it is notable (my revert was more of a knee-jerk reaction, truth be told). Finally, I'd say that a precedent on other articles doesn't affect how this article should be edited; please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for more info. – Richard BB 15:11, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
List of Doom Metal bands
I won't worry about listing the other bands, but please leave Alice And Chains off doom metal list. I mean come on man. They are grunge with a light metal influence. :P — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.191.7.57 (talk) 10:37, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Acid Witch
They were a band I left on the doom metal page. They are on wikipedia, and even have doom listed as a genre. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.191.7.57 (talk) 10:46, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- I'm afraid with both of these bands we have to leave it as it is. With Alice in Chains, though we many not consider them doom, we have to go by what the reliable sources say; see WP:RS and WP:V for more info. The same goes for Acid Witch; even if their article calls them doom, we need a citation to include them in this list. Thanks for getting back to me! – Richard BB 10:49, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Citation!
How may I get one? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.191.7.57 (talk) 10:53, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- Typically -- with music -- magazines, books, and (certain) websites will do. You have to be very careful with websites, though -- there are a huge number that aren't considered reliable because they're edited by its users (such as the Metal Archives, or even Wikipedia itself). However, the people over at the heavy metal Wikiproject will be able to help you out far more than I could. They may well have a list of websites that they typically use, and will be able to give you advice as to which sites are accepted and which aren't. Click the link I just provided, then click on the talk page at the top, and start a discussion regarding what you'd like to do and ask them where you might find good resources to use (and if you ever find a citation that you're unsure about, you could always run it past them first). These guys will know best what advice to give you. – Richard BB 11:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you! I added The fall of every season once more with a site I believe to be reliable, as I seen others mentioned with the same site. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eclip13ticaL (talk • contribs) 11:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
I am back again... I just wanted to say that there is no link activated to go to see that Alice In Chains is sludge or doom. I believe it ought to be removed til proven. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eclip13ticaL (talk • contribs) 12:26, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm, that's a good point. Go ahead and remove it. Also, just as a quick side note, you can sign your name after posting something on a talk page by typing four tildes -- ~~~~ -- after your message. At the moment the automated bot is signing them all for you. I get the feeling that your talk page might get spammed by an angry bot at some point ;) – Richard BB 12:37, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Transistor
I have reverted your revert on the transistor page. I felt it was counter-constructive.
The next time you touch my edits, do it after you get my permission.
Amanbir Singh.