Rich Farmbrough (talk | contribs) |
Rich Farmbrough (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{Notice| |
{{Notice| |
||
Quote of the day{{Break}}{{Centre| |
Quote of the day{{Break}}{{Centre| |
||
''Useless twisting of the new technology... ...we have to veto... ...virtual insanity'' {{Sub|{{Small|Jamiroquai, ''VIRTUAL INSANITY''}}}} |
<!-- ''Useless twisting of the new technology... ...we have to veto... ...virtual insanity'' {{Sub|{{Small|Jamiroquai, ''VIRTUAL INSANITY''}}}} |
||
''Like a dose of belladonna, I could cry but I don't wanna, and the dream's lost on me.'' {{Sub|{{Small|Blondie, ''The Dream's Lost on Me''}}}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
<noinclude> |
<noinclude> |
||
{{TOC left}} |
{{TOC left}} |
Revision as of 17:10, 16 May 2012
{{Notice|
Quote of the day
{{Centre|
Links | |
---|---|
FAQ | |
Talk Archive Index | |
follow my blog |
||
This page- Drama free days |
---|
4461 |
|}
Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib
Good tigings to you from a believer in One Creator of the Heavens and the Earth!
i see that you have edited the page Ali_ibn_Abi_Talib on Wikipedia, i must say to you that in Islam it is not allowed to put nor draw nor see the picture of a man
i strongly encourage you o remove the picture from the page of Ali_ibn_Abi_Talib
if you have any queries or questions on that please e-mail me asap, my email is saken_k@hotmail.com
With warmest regards, Saken ibn Amankeldi
- Hello Saken. I am aware of this interpretation of Islam, also prohibitions on depicting any living thing, or indeed depictions at all. I had brought this matter up already, when we were discussing Image Filters, but was told that I was being foolish.
- I suggest you investigate your browser settings and turn off "images".
- All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 16:32, 16 May 2012 (UTC).
How many categories are there?
(Not including redirects). The Transhumanist 11:34, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- A lot! It depends partly on whether you include empty categories and red-linked categories. There are approximately 15,419 soft redirected categories. I'll have a look at the stats by namespace later. Rich Farmbrough, 17:07, 26 April 2012 (UTC).
- Unfortunately we don't have a dump for all page titles, only all main-space titles which currently runs at about 9.3 million. Rich Farmbrough, 11:35, 28 April 2012 (UTC).
- Unfortunately we don't have a dump for all page titles, only all main-space titles which currently runs at about 9.3 million. Rich Farmbrough, 11:35, 28 April 2012 (UTC).
Teahouse talkbacks
Hey Rich! Thanks for helping out at the Teahouse. Just an FYI, we created a lovely little talkback template that is Teahouse specific. You can find a link to it here. It's pretty valuable when letting folks know that you answered their question, since not everyone watches the Teahouse question page. Thanks again for all your contributions - Teahouse and beyond! Sarah (talk) 19:40, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, nice template. I made some suggestions on the templates talk page. Rich Farmbrough, 20:08, 6 May 2012 (UTC).(Using some automation)
Some baklava for you!
Thanks for helping me improve Generation time Trashbird1240 (talk) 14:41, 10 May 2012 (UTC) |
A kitten for you!
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a5/Red_Kitten_01.jpg/150px-Red_Kitten_01.jpg)
If WP bans you its a case of them shooting themselves in the foot. I really mean that.
...William 20:00, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you! Rich Farmbrough, 22:17, 14 May 2012 (UTC).
Women's History redux
Do you have time to do some adjusting at User:AlexNewArtBot/WomensHistory? It's better, but still needs to be narrowed. And most of the articles this time don't seem to be about women.Maile66 (talk) 23:11, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
- WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse
- Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week
- Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 23:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
An arbitration case regarding Rich Farmbrough has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above.
The following remedies have been enacted:
- Rich Farmbrough (talk · contribs) is indefinitely prohibited from using any automation whatsoever on Wikipedia. For the purposes of this remedy, any edits that reasonably appear to be automated shall be assumed to be so.
- Rich Farmbrough's administrator status is revoked. At any time after the closing of this case, Rich Farmbrough may request that his administrator status be restored by filing a request for adminship.
- Elen of the Roads (talk · contribs) is reminded that an administrator who is a party to an arbitration case should not block another editor (or their bot) who is a party to the same case.
For the Arbitration Committee,
--Guerillero | My Talk 19:27, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Truly a sad day on Wikipedia. I for one am truly disappointed at this decision. Good luck Rich regardless of whether you decide to stay and edit or not. Kumioko (talk) 19:33, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- If at some point you are brave/stupid enough to Rfa again I'd support your candidacy. Nobody Ent 19:48, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, Rich. At least you're not banned. I will support your RfA sometime in the future.—cyberpower ChatOnline 19:49, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry to hear this. Dsp13 (talk) 20:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Although I believe you've badly misused automation, I'd support your RfA. I really can't think of anything disruptive you've done with the mop, except possibly (temporarily) breaking the vast majority of article tagging templates. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:09, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, count me in too. — kwami (talk) 21:24, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Agree with the above. This is a shame. :( Acalamari 22:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- It's not heartening to be part of project whose highest body is malfunctioning to the extent that Arbcom is so obviously doing. On the brighter side Richard it's clear you're not the problem but an Arbcom that would be out of depth in a puddle. Obviously would support your RfA anytime. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 22:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- I would support an RfA as well, though I caution that standing for RfA any time before at least six months has passed will almost certainly not succeed. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:58, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- This is a very black moment in Wikipedia. The community has broken Wikipedia. --Dirk Beetstra T C 03:49, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Rich .. to be honest- I don't know enough to say what is right or wrong here. What I do know is that you have dedicated a lot of time and heart to the project; and I personally do appreciate that very much. I can't imagine how difficult it was to endure an AC case, but you do have my sympathies, as well as my appreciation for all you have done (and hopefully will do in the future) for the project. All my best. — Ched : ? 04:36, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
-
- Many thanks for all the support. Rich Farmbrough, 16:37, 16 May 2012 (UTC).
- Many thanks for all the support. Rich Farmbrough, 16:37, 16 May 2012 (UTC).
A cold one
![]() |
You need this more than I do – Lionel (talk) 05:37, 16 May 2012 (UTC) |
Jovan Despotović
Thanks for the comments. I checked and it is these ISBN numbers are in the publications.--Despotović (talk) 14:02, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
It's My Birthday
My B'day Cake | |
Hi!! Today is my b'day and I though of sharing this sweet gift with you!! Arnesh(২০১২) 16:09, 16 May 2012 (UTC) |