by the way... |
Thunderboltz (talk | contribs) →by the way...: copyright problems |
||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
If you end your comments on talk pages with 4 "tildes" (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) the system will automatically sign and date your comments. |
If you end your comments on talk pages with 4 "tildes" (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) the system will automatically sign and date your comments. |
||
==Image copyright problem with Image:Pastor Don.jpg== |
|||
Thanks for uploading [[:Image:Pastor Don.jpg]]. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The [[Wikimedia Foundation]] is very careful about the images included in [[Wikipedia]] because of [[Copyright|copyright law]] (see Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Copyright|Copyright policy]]). |
|||
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are [[open content]], [[public domain]], and [[fair use]]. Find the appropriate template in [[Wikipedia:Image copyright tags]] and place it on the image page like this: <code>{{TemplateName}}</code>. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it. |
|||
Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you. [[User:Deepujoseph| thund]]<font color="green">[[User:Deepujoseph/Esperanza|e]]</font>[[User:Deepujoseph|rboltz]]<sup><font color="green">[[user_talk:Deepujoseph|(Deepu)]]</font></sup> 06:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:20, 6 October 2006
Onfireministries
You have recently created the article Onfireministries. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. --Onorem 13:03, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi Rencin,
I wasn't actually the one who deleted the article, but I did tag it for deletion.
I've found out since then that articles that have been speedily deleted shouldn't be tagged with {db-repost}.
I would recommend that you recreate the article again, but make sure to explain (on the article's talk page) why your organization should have a page.
If someone tags it for deletion again, send it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. That way, there can be some discussion about why your page should be on Wikipedia.
I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, so I can't guarantee that the advice I'm giving you is correct...but it's worth a try. Good luck to you.
--Onorem 11:09, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Hey ,houldn't
Thanks a ton for the information that you gave. I do know that some of them may have done it thinking it is personal pages. So need not worry I just asked you to know why they keep doing like that. Our's is an organization that works with young people in helping them know good morals and God Himself. Many of our viewers are eargly searching for our website. Since it is under another banner we thought we might as well post an article here so that people can get in touch with us through this page .
Thanks a lot for the info, we are praying for you. God bless you brother!
Your Occupation?
What is your occupation and what is it that you have got to do with ON FIRE? Are you a part of them too or just another person who is part of wikipedia? Do you really have any another relation with any other organizations too?
Hello friend!! My occupation is nothing but to share the word of God. I have got nothing to do with ON FIRE because it is not my organization, but I do confess that I am part of that organization too and part of wikipedia. I may or may have but right now I am with ON FIRE and I think that will do for you. rencin24 13:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
My question
My question is wether are you employed only in this organization alon or do you work some where else too? I f so where is that, Just to know you more? Just consider me as friend. This is Nick.
Hey Nick, I am currently working in an MNC.I Really appreciate you for being straight forward and thanks for putting in your name. I work for General Electrical here in INDIA which is famously known as GE. I am visa processor. I process visa for the employees to travell to USA and UK.
Thanks
hi rencin sheryl here
Thanks Sherly for just saying hi in this forum. Will suerly keep praying for you. Rencin Matthewrencin24 06:24, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
What happened to the site?
Hey what happened to the website that was here or the webpage? I am not able to find it? Please do direct me to the current page you have created. Thanks. Nick.
Pentecostal Mission
The best way forward is to write an original article, supported with references to both your book and the paper that the original article was copied from. Write it in your own words. But remember Wikipedia policies - write it in a way that is neutral. Wikipedia cannot assert that something is true, it needs to report on it - think about writing the article as if it were written by an outsider, one who neither follows the church, nor is hostile to it. I'll try to help if I have time. Guettarda 14:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hi. I just got news of a death in the family, so I probably won't be around for a while. You should contact User:Pjacobi, he should be able to figure out what to do next. Guettarda 13:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Image:.onfire.1.jpg listed for deletion
Hey Help Needed
[1]. This page is having some kind of an abuse. Thanks. Nick.
Reply from my talk page
Hi Rencin.
You asked me to look, so I did. What I see is you vandalizing a talk page by removing any comments you disagree with. If you're referring to the article and not the talk page, I don't see where anyone has made inappropriate edits. Is there a specific edit you disagree with, or do you just not like people questioning TPM on the talk page? --Onorem 11:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
The talk page is there so that people can have discussions about the article. It is an appropriate place to voice concerns about the credibility of things mentioned in the article. I don't know -anything- about the topic you're discussing there and wouldn't be qualified to comment, but to me it looked like "Pastor Alvin" raised a few potentially valid questions which were erased instead of addressed. People are going to make changes to pages you spend time on, and it can be frustrating to see something you've worked hard on changed, but there is no ownership of articles. It's there for everyone to contribute to. --Onorem 13:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
September 27
Hello Rencin,
I've noticed you're helping out by adding {stub} and {cleanup} tags.
A couple of notes for stubs:
- When adding stubs, please check to see that the page doesn't have a more specific stub tag already.
- It's preferred that specific stubs from this list are used to help keep things more organized.
- The {stub} should be added to the very bottom of the page.
- Talk pages should never be tagged as stubs.
As for the {cleanup} tags...I did remove a couple of them. The article for Island City, Oregon looks very similar to most articles for small towns in the US, and I'm not sure which part of My Early Burglary Years you thought needed to be cleaned up. There's not a lot of information there, but it seems to be presented well.
Thanks for taking an active part in keeping Wikipedia clean and organized. --Onorem 11:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Finding the articles that should be tagged for deletion is the tough part. I regularly check for articles with N next to them on the 'Recent changes' link that should be under 'navigation' on the left side of your screen. Those are newly created articles, which I think are the easiest to check. I'll also usually check the 'User contributions' of users that have created nonsense articles or vandalized in some other way.
I'm not sure what you mean by "how do I become a wikipedia User". You're already a wikipedia user. --Onorem 12:26, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
pages for chief pastors
Hi Rencin,
It would be difficult to create articles for each of the chief pastor. You should have enough material about each person. Secondly, it would have to meet wikipedia rules too. You may try if you chose to. I was just thinking of putting a list of all prior chief pastors on "TPM" article.--Spm2006 17:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
I have rarely seen such chutzpah even on the New Page Patrol. What you did is nothing but vandalism. - CrazyRussian talk/email 15:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
A friendly word
Hi Rencin. You're clearly new round here and part of the joy of being new is making mistakes. You've made a few here...
- tagging a well-grounded article for deletion
- tagging it for "speedy" deletion compounded the error
- you've then left a message on czrussian's talk page accusing him of being uncivil, when in my opinion he wasn't really (if in the cold light of day you disagree with me, strike this as a mistake by you)
- you've then deleted czrussian's warning message from your own talk page, which you're not supposed to do (someone else can, but you can't do it yourself)
Unfortunately for you, the worst thing about all of this is actually pure bad luck and not your fault - the editor you've accused (incorrectly IMHO) of being uncivil is in the middle of a sensitive nomination for becoming an admin again and his civility or lack of it is rather critical.
May I suggest... if, now things have calmed down, you agree with me on all of the above points, please go to czrussian's talk page and erase your comment, along with an edit summary that says something along the lines of you changing your mind and he wasn't uncivil. I'm sure that if you do this, czrussian will return the favour and return here and blank the warning. After all, you are a newbie.
I hope you take this in the genuine spirit in which it is intended. It's not so long since I was a newbie. --Dweller 10:20, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Picture yourself in the shoes of PastFinder (talk · contribs). He's brand new, and has written a short article. Not two minutes later another user comes along and slaps a speedy deletion tag on the article without articulating any reason whatsoever. How would that make you feel? Not only that, I for one don't think the article merits deletion at all, neither speedy nor any other kind. Deleting other people's work is serious business and should be done gently if the writer wrote the article in good faith, as here. I think an apology to PastFinder is in order. I have removed the useless warning. - CrazyRussian talk/email 12:04, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Pastor Don.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pastor Don.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
by the way...
If you end your comments on talk pages with 4 "tildes" (~~~~) the system will automatically sign and date your comments.
Image copyright problem with Image:Pastor Don.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pastor Don.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.
Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. thunderboltz(Deepu) 06:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)