Nikitchenko (talk | contribs) |
With all due respect Nikitchenko's claims are simply not true. |
||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
Redvers, sorry to bother. I see you are from Esperanza. I need someone who could help with a dispute so that I won't have to go through red tape of RfC. Do you know anyone who can be fair? Some users are removing my dispute tag after I am saying their use wording is making things look like facts when all they really are is someone's claims (in a legal deposition). --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 17:51, 11 April 2006 (UTC) |
Redvers, sorry to bother. I see you are from Esperanza. I need someone who could help with a dispute so that I won't have to go through red tape of RfC. Do you know anyone who can be fair? Some users are removing my dispute tag after I am saying their use wording is making things look like facts when all they really are is someone's claims (in a legal deposition). --[[User:Nikitchenko|Nikitchenko]] 17:51, 11 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
:With all due respect this simply is not true. The part that is being reverted is your actual deletion of the claims made. The article states: |
|||
:*''"In a deposition, Scarff alleged that OSA plotted the murder of Scientology critic [[Cynthia Kisser]] and her young daughter, but this was not carried out as the would-be assassin reported it to law enforcement."'' |
|||
:However your edit was: |
|||
:*''"In a deposition, Scarff alleged that OSA plotted the murder of Scientology critic [[Cynthia Kisser]] and her young daughter, which never occured."'' |
|||
:The statement '''''"was not carried out as the would-be assassin reported it to law enforcement"''''' is paramount and the start of the sentence clearly states it was claimed by one man in a deposition. |
|||
:No less than four other editors (most admins) have reverted your changes. Hope this helps clarify. - '''[[User:Stollery|Gl]][[User:Stollery/Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Stollery|n]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Stollery|T]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Stollery|C]]</sub> 17:58, 11 April 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:58, 11 April 2006
This is the talk page for talking to, with or about me, Redvers | ||
Archives ► 2005 • 2006 ► Jan • Feb • Mar • Apr 01-10 |
Sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). If you don't, I will not reply. Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A Descriptive Header==. The easiest way to do this is by clicking . Remember, this is my talk page and as such I reserve the right to archive, edit and remove posts as I see fit. Vandalism and personal attacks will be deleted on sight unless I find the content amusing. I will reply on your talk page unless you ask me to reply here. |
Talk page guidelines Please respect Wikiquette, assume good faith and be nice. |
Mister Kite
Look. I can not prove anything, since you have blocked me. I get the hint - I made a false edit in that it got deleted, but no one actually managed to explain it to me.
First you tell me to prove it, I do, then you want me to prove it on the article, which you've blocked for me.
If you unblock, I will add all the references I can.
It was just a mistake, and one that could have been easily corrected instead of ignored.
Ackehallgren 15:26, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Userboxes
I have just reviewed your userboxes. I am shocked to find out you were vandalised 25 times.
However, as I scrolled down I could see why!
A gay, Welsh, aethiest, lefty, vegie I can deal with. But a Morrissey fan! That disgusts me :-)
simonthebold 20:16, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Mister Kite
Please help me. I'm not trying to be rude, destructive or vandalize. I want to prove what you want me to prove, but I can't with a closed article.
Ackehallgren 21:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
A KISS Rfa Thanks
Thank you, I've been promoted. pschemp | talk 01:36, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Bowland Challenge
Noticed your prod was taken off Bowland Challenge without the article being improved much. Now along with added offsite links to the event itself, it’s just gotten worse.
Do you believe the next step should be AfD?
Thanks! Landeyda 08:00, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Mister Kite
Ah! Terribly sorry then. Did simply not understand where you ment. Thank you.
Jaimie Brooks
I see you have (very!) speedily deleted the page I created with the above title. Admittedly it was not a long article and probably needed more depth, but as Vice Chairman of a cricket club why would he deserve an speedy deletion. All facts in the article were verifiable.
Yours in cyberspace
Timmyweb 12:51, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Jaimie Brooks
I'm guessing it's not worth saying that I missed out that he was an international arms dealer?!
Timmyweb 13:09, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
ProhibitOnions's RfA
Thank you, Redvers! | ||
...for voting in my RFA. It passed with a result of 58/2/0. If you have any comments, or for some reason need any new-admin help, please let me know here. Regards, ProhibitOnions 22:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC) |
Fake barn stars
Can you please confirm if you awarded User:The_Man's_Plans any barn stars. It is strongly suspected that he is misrepresenting himself.
CPirzl
I have just created a page for Conecta4 and it has given me a notification of: This page may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. The given reason is: blatant advertisement for a non-notable company; alexa rank of above 4,000,000....
What i am trying to do is create an input of information for the company Conect4 8such as many other ocmpanies have of wikipedia).
What do i have to do to not get the page deleted?
thank you in advance
Cpirzl, new page speedy deletion?
I have just created a page for Conecta4 and it has given me a notification of: This page may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. The given reason is: blatant advertisement for a non-notable company; alexa rank of above 4,000,000....
What i am trying to do is create an input of information for the company Conect4 8such as many other ocmpanies have of wikipedia).
What do i have to do to not get the page deleted?
thank you in advance --Cpirzl 17:04, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Disputes
Redvers, sorry to bother. I see you are from Esperanza. I need someone who could help with a dispute so that I won't have to go through red tape of RfC. Do you know anyone who can be fair? Some users are removing my dispute tag after I am saying their use wording is making things look like facts when all they really are is someone's claims (in a legal deposition). --Nikitchenko 17:51, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- With all due respect this simply is not true. The part that is being reverted is your actual deletion of the claims made. The article states:
- "In a deposition, Scarff alleged that OSA plotted the murder of Scientology critic Cynthia Kisser and her young daughter, but this was not carried out as the would-be assassin reported it to law enforcement."
- However your edit was:
- "In a deposition, Scarff alleged that OSA plotted the murder of Scientology critic Cynthia Kisser and her young daughter, which never occured."
- The statement "was not carried out as the would-be assassin reported it to law enforcement" is paramount and the start of the sentence clearly states it was claimed by one man in a deposition.