Jona Lendering~enwiki (talk | contribs) |
Jona Lendering~enwiki (talk | contribs) Jona's edits |
||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
Sorry Rayis - I tried to roll back a large rollback by "Mardavich", but instead killed your improvements. I'm trying to correct it. Sorry.[[User:Jona Lendering|Jona Lendering]] 14:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
Sorry Rayis - I tried to roll back a large rollback by "Mardavich", but instead killed your improvements. I'm trying to correct it. Sorry.[[User:Jona Lendering|Jona Lendering]] 14:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
: I hope it's better now. You've requested more evidence; I have put online on my website two contemporary texts by Nabonidus and inserted links to it. They were removed by Mardavich, who also removed your improvements and reinserted an erroneous summary. I think there is now a more or less adequate discussion of the modern propaganda aspect, and there are several links to modern literature. I hope you can agree.[[User:Jona Lendering|Jona Lendering]] 14:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
: I hope it's better now. You've requested more evidence; I have put online on my website two contemporary texts by Nabonidus and inserted links to it. They were removed by Mardavich, who also removed your improvements and reinserted an erroneous summary. I think there is now a more or less adequate discussion of the modern propaganda aspect, and there are several links to modern literature. I hope you can agree.[[User:Jona Lendering|Jona Lendering]] 14:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Jona's edits == |
|||
Hi Jona, about this article I would like to point out a few things: |
|||
1- You are conducting your original research and putting it on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:No original research. |
|||
-Do it elsewhere. |
|||
:: I am sorry, I am not. I have decently put online sources: U.N. letters, ancient cuneiform tablets. What else do you need? |
|||
2- You are claiming your point of view Please see WP:NPOV |
|||
-Accept other points of view. |
|||
:: I will, if there are arguments. It is plainly incorrect that the CC is a unique document, or that it deals with the return of people instead of gods. |
|||
3- You are claiming ownership of the article Please see Wikipedia:Ownership of articles |
|||
-Let others edit. |
|||
:: No, I am not, but as things stand, I am the only one capable of actually reading the text. I am also the only one at present who is quoting recent publications, instead of old texts, based on pre-Schaudig editions. I am not claiming any privilege, but if people bring forward pre-Schaudig information, I feel to remove it. |
|||
I see you have rolled back to the pre-Schaudig info, but now I will not remove it; I can live with your remark that the pre-Schaudig info is contested (as it should be). Let's first see what the others do.[[User:Jona Lendering|Jona Lendering]] 17:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:40, 28 January 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
|
Help please!
Hi Rayis! I expanded this article some more. I would like to invite you to see the article again. I would like to invite you to see the parts on Iranian culture in particular. Thanks and all the best. Sina Kardar 15:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note. Yes the section on Ansar e hezbollah is too short. The reason is that I don't know much about them and I need to study a bit and find good sources. It would be great if you could help expanding it. Looking forward to your comments and edits in future! Take care. Sina Kardar 19:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Links Cyrus Cylinder
Dear Rayis, I have retried the links you reinserted, but get a blank page. Can you please check it? Jona Lendering 23:19, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Iranian Languages Template
Dear Rayis – Here is a copy a template for Iranian Languages Group – according to your wonderful idea. Regards Surena 07:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rayis - please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khorasani Turkish language. Surena 20:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
My view
See User_talk:Patchouli#My_viewpoint.--Patchouli 18:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Apology
Sorry Rayis - I tried to roll back a large rollback by "Mardavich", but instead killed your improvements. I'm trying to correct it. Sorry.Jona Lendering 14:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- I hope it's better now. You've requested more evidence; I have put online on my website two contemporary texts by Nabonidus and inserted links to it. They were removed by Mardavich, who also removed your improvements and reinserted an erroneous summary. I think there is now a more or less adequate discussion of the modern propaganda aspect, and there are several links to modern literature. I hope you can agree.Jona Lendering 14:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Jona's edits
Hi Jona, about this article I would like to point out a few things:
1- You are conducting your original research and putting it on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:No original research. -Do it elsewhere.
- I am sorry, I am not. I have decently put online sources: U.N. letters, ancient cuneiform tablets. What else do you need?
2- You are claiming your point of view Please see WP:NPOV -Accept other points of view.
- I will, if there are arguments. It is plainly incorrect that the CC is a unique document, or that it deals with the return of people instead of gods.
3- You are claiming ownership of the article Please see Wikipedia:Ownership of articles -Let others edit.
- No, I am not, but as things stand, I am the only one capable of actually reading the text. I am also the only one at present who is quoting recent publications, instead of old texts, based on pre-Schaudig editions. I am not claiming any privilege, but if people bring forward pre-Schaudig information, I feel to remove it.
I see you have rolled back to the pre-Schaudig info, but now I will not remove it; I can live with your remark that the pre-Schaudig info is contested (as it should be). Let's first see what the others do.Jona Lendering 17:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)