→Happy to merge: - Watching. |
m Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:Ral315/Archive 18 |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<!-- Please do not edit above this line --> |
<!-- Please do not edit above this line --> |
||
== DR == |
|||
I have the right to do work for the Signpost. |
|||
I WILL implemt [[WP:DR]. |
|||
I will take these steps. |
|||
# Talk to you |
|||
# Request a 3rd party |
|||
# Informal Medatation |
|||
# Formal Medatation |
|||
# ALL STEPS MENTIONED I CAN AGREE TO |
|||
# Arab. Comm. |
|||
I am also requesting a editior review to see ''where I '''''Can''''' help'' |
|||
Thank You |
|||
[[User:Nathannoblet|Nathannoblet]] 06:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:You've talked to him. You want a third party? Fine, I'll be it. Stop bothering him, and stop wasting time and resources before you get blocked for disruption or something. – [[User:Chacor|Ch]][[User talk:Chacor|acor]] 07:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::After you refuse steps 1-5, step 6 has been activated. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Nathannoblet|Nathannoblet]] ([[User talk:Nathannoblet|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nathannoblet|contribs]]) 09:19, 9 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> |
|||
===[[Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/December 2006/Nathannoblet]]=== |
|||
Hi Ral315, Nathannoblet has brought this request for assistance to the [[WP:AMA|Association of Members' Advocates]]' attention. Would you be willing to participate? Thanks, <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User talk:riana_dzasta|riana_'''dzasta''']]</span> 03:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:Apologies, I was at dinner. I'm reading your e-mail now. Cheers, <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">[[User talk:riana_dzasta|riana_'''dzasta''']]</span> 12:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Wikipedia Times.... == |
== Wikipedia Times.... == |
Revision as of 15:28, 17 December 2006
|
Wikipedia Times....
Have you seen your new rival? Written by none other than... noblet :) --Majorly 19:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- I don't mean to laugh at the situation, but I really have to... Apologies for not swatting this fly earlier :) -- Longhair\talk 09:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Good work
Thanks for cleaning up those bad-faith AfDs. I wasn't going to get to those for at least a few hours. I appreciate the help! | Mr. Darcy talk 02:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Various stuff
Was nosing around and saw this massive vote for the main page redesign (687). Is that the record for any single vote? I wonder what the total number voting in the various ArbCom elections has been, and how many voted in the various Wikimedia Foundation Board Elections (though that is not just en-wiki)? Oh, and I replied to your comment on my talk page. Thanks for that. Carcharoth 03:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
You have voted both in support of and in opposition to this candidate. Please remove (at least) one of these. —Cryptic 14:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Re: ArbCom tally
Ral315 wrote:
Sorry about that. The bot was working fine, but the internet was off for several hours. Not sure why, probably some sort of maintenance as it affected the whole area. It's working again now – Gurch 03:28, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Come and vote
Hi,
I've just started an award, why not come and see what it is? Don't forget to vote!
CarrotMan 07:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Anniversaries
I spotted the 100th Signpost anniversary thing, and was wondering if the Signpost will cover the sixth anniversary of Wikipedia in January? Carcharoth 13:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Vote on the silly poll
Hi, Ral. IMO, polls like that are a bad idea and I don't vote in them. But, since it is going on, it has to be presumed to be the poll on the merits of the ArbCom decision, not on the merits of the case itself. As such, it's to my mind inappropriate for ArbCom members to vote in it - it's like admin candidates voting on their own RFAs, to use the closest analogy we have. I fear your vote may be perceived to be disrupting the poll, which isn't likely to do anybody any good. Zocky | picture popups 13:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nah, I didn't confuse you with Raul. For some reason I did indeed think you were on ArbCom. Did you run last year, or did I get confused for no reason? Zocky | picture popups 01:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Happy to merge
Look, I am happy to merge only if I can somehow be involved with the signpost. I am not letting my newspaper collapsp just because you started a rouge merge.Anyway, I were never told of these requirements ever. You shold have told me so I could fix up my writing. I am very,very sorry and I think I have just wrecked my chance of getting on ArbCom next year. (sob bob). Sorry again -- Nathannoblet 06:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- I have blocked this user for a month see reasoning here --Trödel 17:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)