m Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:Ral315/Archive 20 |
Signpost spamlist |
||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
Hello, Ral315! Though I am currently taking a WikiBreak, I still like to keep up with WP news, and I would like to request that my name be kept on the spamlist. Thank you for everything! :) –- <strong>[[User:Kungming2|<font color="blue"> kungming·</font>]][[User:Kungming2/Esperanza|<font color="green">2</font>]]</strong> [[User_talk:Kungming2|<font color="#999999"><sup>(Talk)</font></sup>]] 07:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC) |
Hello, Ral315! Though I am currently taking a WikiBreak, I still like to keep up with WP news, and I would like to request that my name be kept on the spamlist. Thank you for everything! :) –- <strong>[[User:Kungming2|<font color="blue"> kungming·</font>]][[User:Kungming2/Esperanza|<font color="green">2</font>]]</strong> [[User_talk:Kungming2|<font color="#999999"><sup>(Talk)</font></sup>]] 07:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Signpost spamlist == |
|||
Hi Ral315, though I have not edited much recently due to real life demands, I do want to keep up with developments here. Please reactivate my subscription to the signpost. Thanks. [[User:Mmounties|Mmounties]] (<small>[[User talk:Mmounties|Talk]]</small>) [[Image:pawprint.png|20px]] 17:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:50, 9 February 2007
|
Er, I think you misread Geogre's comment on active vs. inactive admins... he didn't say that most admins were inactive on Wikipedia-the-website, but that very few admins are active on #wikipedia-en-admins. Cheers, FreplySpang 17:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
IRC arbitration story
I'm working on doing some interviews related to this, so I'll go ahead and write it. --Michael Snow 18:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Wiki Newspaper
Hi, I know you're the president of the Wikipedia Signpost and I am sorry to bother you but could you please give me a piece of advice, I am the Founder of a wiki and I decided on having a wiki newspaper. Could you please give me some tips. - | Jimwitz. Please respond here.
Ralbot enquiry
Hello, My name is James (also known as User:Extranet on Wikipedia) and I was looking into running a bot that delivers newsletters and other press releases that Wikipedia users sign up for (similar to the type of bot that you own/run - User:Ralbot). I don't really have much knowledge in Perl or anything, but I was just wondering whether you can possibly give me some suggestions whether I can request a same kind of bot to what you are using or even help us out. You can reply on my . Many thanks, Extranet (Talk | Contribs) 05:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I just stumbled upon the old Wikipedia:Deletion logs and found out that you deleted the whole archive, stating that there were "concerns over libel in deletion summaries". You also stated that you'd restore the logs soon, but it's now quite a while ago since you said that, so are there still plans to undelete the logs? I'm also somewhat confused about the whole thing in general, since I can't really imagine that there were a lot of potentially libellous statements in the first place, we're talking about trusted admins here, after all. Therefore, removing all deletion summaries seems to be a bit too much, IMHO. Looking through the logs and removing the handful of potentially libellous statements seems like a more sensible approach to me. After all, the old deletion logs, including the deletion summaries/reasons for deletion, are quite useful to have. Also, just out of curiosity, where can the discussions with other admins you mentioned be found? --Conti|✉ 21:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm, I see. The Google problem could be solved by moving the logs to Articles for deletion subpages (or others that are also included in our robots.txt). Going through all these logs and removing potentially libellous statements sounds like a huge task for sure, and I can understand that no one is keen on doing that (me included). Couldn't you just search for "content was:" type of deletion summaries and remove them, tho? I've looked through some of the older logs, and pretty much all deletion summaries that contained the original text that was deleted had either easily searchable words in it ("content:", "Full Text:", "says" or something similar) and/or started and ended with quotation marks. Would it be possible to just remove such summaries? I know that this would be more work than just removing all deletion summaries, but I think losing them all would be quite a pity. --Conti|✉ 16:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
dob
So linear of you :P
—User:Adrian/zap2.js 2007-02-06 07:55Z
Could you help with some research?
Hello Ral315,
I'm currently in the middle of a PhD at the University of Bath, UK. I'm examining the way that mediation differs between face-to-face, video-conferenced and text-based meetings. You can get a gist of the research from my (somewhat sparse) homepage here.
Would you be willing to spare some time to talk to me about your experiences mediating? It'd help me out no end!
If you'd like some more info, you can leave a message on my talkpage or contact me via the e-mail address on my homepage.
Many thanks
Matt
MattB2 08:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
My RFA
Thanks for spotting the forum business, I would never have seen that myself in a million years. I thought that whole business was over, but clearly someone holds a grudge. Oh well. Cheers, Moreschi Deletion! 09:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
...for the welcome. --MeStevo 18:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Re: Signpost Spamlist
Hello, Ral315! Though I am currently taking a WikiBreak, I still like to keep up with WP news, and I would like to request that my name be kept on the spamlist. Thank you for everything! :) –- kungming·2 (Talk) 07:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost spamlist
Hi Ral315, though I have not edited much recently due to real life demands, I do want to keep up with developments here. Please reactivate my subscription to the signpost. Thanks. Mmounties (Talk) 17:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)