Rajput of Garhwal (talk | contribs) →Rajputisation: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Topic banned for persistent caste promotion |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
The information published by you about rajputs of uttarakhand divisions garhwal and kumaon are not accurate. Yes there were 2-3 khas caste that were in this process but you have written as if all of rajputs of our region are rajputised which is not at all true. We are pure blooded rajputs and only marry with real rajputs and the rajputised ones are still considered of low social status so please publish the right information . [[User:Rajput of Garhwal|Rajput of Garhwal]] ([[User talk:Rajput of Garhwal#top|talk]]) 05:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC) |
The information published by you about rajputs of uttarakhand divisions garhwal and kumaon are not accurate. Yes there were 2-3 khas caste that were in this process but you have written as if all of rajputs of our region are rajputised which is not at all true. We are pure blooded rajputs and only marry with real rajputs and the rajputised ones are still considered of low social status so please publish the right information . [[User:Rajput of Garhwal|Rajput of Garhwal]] ([[User talk:Rajput of Garhwal#top|talk]]) 05:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC) |
||
==Caste promotion== |
|||
You have twice removed[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rajputisation&diff=prev&oldid=1079720645][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rajputisation&diff=1086364911&oldid=1086363463] well-sourced content at [[Rajputisation]] without giving any source for your opinion. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rajputisation&diff=prev&oldid=1079720645 The first time] your edit summary was quite alarming, suggesting caste promotion motives behind your edits. [[Rajputisation]] is now under [[WP:ECP|extended confirmed protection]], which means that inexperienced users such as you are not able to edit it. However, I see other similar edits to less high-profile pages that are specifically concerned with Uttarakhand, such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Garhwal_Kingdom&diff=prev&oldid=1085062028 this] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bisht_(surname)&diff=prev&oldid=1086609917 this], both of which I have reverted as unsourced. Wikipedia goes by reliable sources, not your personal opinion or my personal opinion. Such edits do harm, especially on less well-watched pages. I notice also your username, and your doubled (?) response to LukeEmily above, both of which suggest you are on Wikipedia for the purpose of promoting your own caste ("We are pure blooded rajputs and only marry with real rajputs", etc). I have therefore topic banned you from all caste-related pages and edits, see below. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|tålk]] 08:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC). |
|||
==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban== |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
|2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg |
|||
|imagesize=50px |
|||
|1=The following [[WP:TBAN|topic ban]] now applies to you: |
|||
{{Talkquote|1=You are indefinitely topic banned from all pages concerned with caste and all edits that are relevant to caste.}} |
|||
You have been sanctioned because of persistent unsourced caste promotion including removal of sourced content. |
|||
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved administrator]] under the authority of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]]'s decision at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision]] and, if applicable, the procedure described at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]. This sanction has been recorded in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log/2022|log of sanctions]]. Please read [[WP:TBAN]] to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for an extended period to enforce the ban. |
|||
If you wish to appeal the ban, please read [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeals and modifications|the appeals process]]. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction/topicban.--> [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|tålk]] 08:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
Revision as of 08:14, 7 May 2022
Rajput of Garhwal, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Rajput of Garhwal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC) |
Important information
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | tålk 12:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC).
Rajputization
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rajputization , without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Please do not remove sourced information from any wikipedia page. Please discuss on talk page if you have concerns. Thanks LukeEmily (talk) 19:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
The information published by you about rajputs of uttarakhand divisions garhwal and kumaon are not accurate. Yes there were 2-3 khas caste that were in this process but you have written as if all of rajputs of our region are rajputised which is not at all true. We are pure blooded rajputs and only marry with real rajputs and the rajputised ones are still considered to low social status so please publish the right information because we have problem with this one. Rajput of Garhwal (talk) 05:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Rajputisation
The information published by you about rajputs of uttarakhand divisions garhwal and kumaon are not accurate. Yes there were 2-3 khas caste that were in this process but you have written as if all of rajputs of our region are rajputised which is not at all true. We are pure blooded rajputs and only marry with real rajputs and the rajputised ones are still considered of low social status so please publish the right information . Rajput of Garhwal (talk) 05:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Caste promotion
You have twice removed[1][2] well-sourced content at Rajputisation without giving any source for your opinion. The first time your edit summary was quite alarming, suggesting caste promotion motives behind your edits. Rajputisation is now under extended confirmed protection, which means that inexperienced users such as you are not able to edit it. However, I see other similar edits to less high-profile pages that are specifically concerned with Uttarakhand, such as this and this, both of which I have reverted as unsourced. Wikipedia goes by reliable sources, not your personal opinion or my personal opinion. Such edits do harm, especially on less well-watched pages. I notice also your username, and your doubled (?) response to LukeEmily above, both of which suggest you are on Wikipedia for the purpose of promoting your own caste ("We are pure blooded rajputs and only marry with real rajputs", etc). I have therefore topic banned you from all caste-related pages and edits, see below. Bishonen | tålk 08:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC).
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban
The following topic ban now applies to you:
You are indefinitely topic banned from all pages concerned with caste and all edits that are relevant to caste.
You have been sanctioned because of persistent unsourced caste promotion including removal of sourced content.
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.
If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | tålk 08:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC)