Rajput of Garhwal (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Rajput of Garhwal (talk | contribs) →Rajputisation: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
The information published by you about rajputs of uttarakhand divisions garhwal and kumaon are not accurate. Yes there were 2-3 khas caste that were in this process but you have written as if all of rajputs of our region are rajputised which is not at all true. We are pure blooded rajputs and only marry with real rajputs and the rajputised ones are still considered to low social status so please publish the right information because we have problem with this one. [[User:Rajput of Garhwal|Rajput of Garhwal]] ([[User talk:Rajput of Garhwal#top|talk]]) 05:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC) |
The information published by you about rajputs of uttarakhand divisions garhwal and kumaon are not accurate. Yes there were 2-3 khas caste that were in this process but you have written as if all of rajputs of our region are rajputised which is not at all true. We are pure blooded rajputs and only marry with real rajputs and the rajputised ones are still considered to low social status so please publish the right information because we have problem with this one. [[User:Rajput of Garhwal|Rajput of Garhwal]] ([[User talk:Rajput of Garhwal#top|talk]]) 05:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC) |
||
== Rajputisation == |
|||
The information published by you about rajputs of uttarakhand divisions garhwal and kumaon are not accurate. Yes there were 2-3 khas caste that were in this process but you have written as if all of rajputs of our region are rajputised which is not at all true. We are pure blooded rajputs and only marry with real rajputs and the rajputised ones are still considered of low social status so please publish the right information . [[User:Rajput of Garhwal|Rajput of Garhwal]] ([[User talk:Rajput of Garhwal#top|talk]]) 05:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:55, 7 May 2022
Rajput of Garhwal, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Rajput of Garhwal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC) |
Important information
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | tålk 12:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC).
Rajputization
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rajputization , without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Please do not remove sourced information from any wikipedia page. Please discuss on talk page if you have concerns. Thanks LukeEmily (talk) 19:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
The information published by you about rajputs of uttarakhand divisions garhwal and kumaon are not accurate. Yes there were 2-3 khas caste that were in this process but you have written as if all of rajputs of our region are rajputised which is not at all true. We are pure blooded rajputs and only marry with real rajputs and the rajputised ones are still considered to low social status so please publish the right information because we have problem with this one. Rajput of Garhwal (talk) 05:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Rajputisation
The information published by you about rajputs of uttarakhand divisions garhwal and kumaon are not accurate. Yes there were 2-3 khas caste that were in this process but you have written as if all of rajputs of our region are rajputised which is not at all true. We are pure blooded rajputs and only marry with real rajputs and the rajputised ones are still considered of low social status so please publish the right information . Rajput of Garhwal (talk) 05:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)