→Naroo: new section |
arbitration enforcement sanction |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Please see my comments at [[Talk:Naroo#Sources]]. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 08:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC) |
Please see my comments at [[Talk:Naroo#Sources]]. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 08:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC) |
||
==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction== |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
|2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg |
|||
|imagesize=50px |
|||
|1=The following sanction now applies to you: |
|||
{{Talkquote|1=You have been indefinitely topic banned from [[Naroo]] and related pages. Please read [[WP:TBAN| this policy]] to see what "topic banned" means.}} |
|||
You have been sanctioned for repeated disruptive editing and unwillingness to discuss. You have continued to insert material based on unreliable sources instead of, for instance, replying to Sitush on [[Talk:Naroo]] or here. I see you have never in fact used the article talkpage, nor responded to any comment on this page, but simply [[WP:edit war|edit warred]] on the article itself. |
|||
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved administrator]] under the authority of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]]'s decision at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision]] and, if applicable, the procedure described at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]. This sanction has been recorded in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log/2016|log of sanctions]]. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banning policy]] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. |
|||
You may appeal this sanction using the process described [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeals and modifications|here]]. I recommend that you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 13:39, 16 June 2016 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
Revision as of 13:39, 16 June 2016
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 - Sitush (talk) 06:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Naroo
Please see my comments at Talk:Naroo#Sources. - Sitush (talk) 08:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
The following sanction now applies to you:
You have been indefinitely topic banned from Naroo and related pages. Please read this policy to see what "topic banned" means.
You have been sanctioned for repeated disruptive editing and unwillingness to discuss. You have continued to insert material based on unreliable sources instead of, for instance, replying to Sitush on Talk:Naroo or here. I see you have never in fact used the article talkpage, nor responded to any comment on this page, but simply edit warred on the article itself.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 13:39, 16 June 2016 (UTC)