Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
== G-WAN |
== You (RadioFan) Censoring G-WAN was pure vandalism == |
||
This night, the article I just wrote yesterday evening was already flagged for deletion: |
This night, the article I just wrote yesterday evening was already flagged for deletion: |
Revision as of 12:58, 16 March 2011
|
I am not an admin, I'm an editor like you. I did not delete your page and I cannot restore it. If you are here to comment on a page I marked with maintenance concerns or for deletion please read the following first and click on the link in the yellow box below to leave me a message if you have additional questions:
- for all articles, please refer to WP:V, WP:RS and especially WP:N
- for articles about bands, musical artists, albums and songs: WP:BAND WP:NSONGS
- for companies and organizations: WP:CORP
- for radio stations: WP:WPRS
- for articles tagged with copyright concerns: Wikipedia:Copyright violations
- for articles about you, your band, your company, or your club: WP:COI and WP:AUTO
If you concerned about the speed that I and other New Page Patrollers tag newly created articles, consider how we are to know that you are not done with your contribution and then read for ideas on how let others know you plan to add more to the article very soon.
You (RadioFan) Censoring G-WAN was pure vandalism
This night, the article I just wrote yesterday evening was already flagged for deletion:
"It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:
largely promotional article on an unremarkable web server. Claims are referenced with primary sources or blogs. Lacks coverage in 3rd party reliable sources."
I liked the "Lacks coverage in 3rd party reliable sources" comment since the external link targeted here is for a "Swiss Federal Institute of Technology" Laboratory Student involved in the "Distributed Information Systems Laboratory".
1) I hardly can be accused of having any grip on the Academic world ("3rd Party");
2) the "Distributed Information Systems Laboratory" of one of the most respected universities in the world can hardly be qualified of NOT being a "reliable source".
Sure, G-WAN's comparative benchmarks hurt some sensibilities. But this is no excuse for blatant lies.
The reason for you to remove G-WAN this time was "addition with no article".
Since the G-WAN article HAS BEEN CENSORED by Wikipedia 'moderators' like the one making this remark, this is a vicious circle: they make their own luck to justify blatant censorship.
In the past, similar fallacious arguments were used, like removing all references and then claiming that no references were available, or claiming that G-WAN is not 'notable' while G-WAN is the fastest Web Server on BOTH Windows AND Linux (and by a large margin, see the links above), and whether user-mode or kernel-mode servers are considered.
For the record, "notability" means "the quality that makes somebody or something worth paying attention to".
PLEASE STOP THE BLATANT CENSORSHIP Bugapi (talk) 12:57, 16 March 2011 (UTC)