Draft of Natasha Demkina article |
|||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
I noticed that you previously merged the [[Rangers_TV]] article with the [[Rangers F.C.]] article. I have reversed this change and improved the [[Rangers_TV]] article. I did this because there is a [[Celtic_TV]] article. --[[User:Sir Roy Biv|Sir Roy Biv]] 04:31, 10 June 2006 (UTC) |
I noticed that you previously merged the [[Rangers_TV]] article with the [[Rangers F.C.]] article. I have reversed this change and improved the [[Rangers_TV]] article. I did this because there is a [[Celtic_TV]] article. --[[User:Sir Roy Biv|Sir Roy Biv]] 04:31, 10 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
==Natasha Demkina article== |
|||
Hi Bob, I noticed your feedback on a [[Wikipedia:Peer_review/Natasha_Demkina|peer review]] for the [[Natasha Demkina]] article. I've been working on a [[User:Dreadlocke/ND|draft]] that expands the article to include more of her background history, her family, current events, and more on the debate concerining the CSICOP test. I'd appreciate it if you'd take a look at the draft and let me know what you think. Thanks! - [[User:Dreadlocke|Dreadlocke]] 01:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:30, 12 June 2006
These are just links to copies of my talk page before I did a cleanup/purge.
Please add new conversations below. Thanks. RJH |
Error estmates for distances
Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Astronomical_objects#Error_estimates_for_distances. Spacepotato 06:20, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Okay I replied. Thank you. — RJH 16:02, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Radius of galaxies
Hi, I'm the guy that tweaked some things in the M31 article. I've noticed that in almost all galaxy articles the words "diameter" and "radius" are used as if they have the same meaning. This is obviously not the case, so the value for "radius" is almost always given as the diameter! (e.g. a galaxy with a diameter of 10.000 lightyear is stated to have a radius of 10.000 lightyear instead of 5000) I have corrected this in a few articles, but everyone keeps doing it wrong. What could we do about it?
I have another question. Athough my English is at a fairly good level, it is far from perfect (my native language being Dutch). I have a wide range of interests, and I like to participate where I can for Wikipedia. However, in some cases my edits are containing quite some spelling and grammar mistakes. Some (not very polite) users said to me in response that "I should go back to the Dutch-language wikipedia". What is your view on this issue?
Regards, DaMatriX 17:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Lunar Craters
I'm sorry, but lunar craters are not realy my speciality and I'm not that much interested in them ;). Besides, the Dutchmen mentioned are completely unknown to me, so I have no idea why they have a crater named after them. I mean, I know many famous Dutch astronomers (Bart Bok, Gerard Kuiper and Jan Oort to name a few) but I'm pretty sure the ones you mentioned are no wellknown Dutchmen!
Greetings, DaMatriX 22:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. Thanks. — RJH 22:27, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Article Deletion
Lincoln High School (Sioux Falls) listed for deletion
Thanks for inserting the Hungarian source. I did not find it nor was it there. It's certainly hard to believe there are so few hits for his name. It wasn't so farfetched that I thought he was a hoax. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 04:17, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Large Hadron Collider is Science Collaboration of the Week
You voted for and this article is now the current Science Collaboration of the Week! Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia science article. |
Samsara (talk • contribs) 11:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi RJ, thanks for your comments on the peer review of Operation Auca. You mentioned that a map might be useful, so I drew one and added it to the article. It doesn't specify the regions where the Huaorani lived, because they were rather nomadic, but it does help the reader get an idea of the respective locations of the places that the article mentions. If you get a chance, let me know what you think. Thanks! --Spangineer[es] (háblame) 16:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
RJHall - Thank you for your peer review suggestions about tent pegging; you are indeed polite! I have added some wikilinks and footnotes, as per your suggestions. Thanks again. Tilting 20:07, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Apartheid
Your comment hits on exactly why the disambiguation page is necessary. I hope you consider voting at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apartheid (disambiguation). Homey 21:33, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Rangers TV
I noticed that you previously merged the Rangers_TV article with the Rangers F.C. article. I have reversed this change and improved the Rangers_TV article. I did this because there is a Celtic_TV article. --Sir Roy Biv 04:31, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Natasha Demkina article
Hi Bob, I noticed your feedback on a peer review for the Natasha Demkina article. I've been working on a draft that expands the article to include more of her background history, her family, current events, and more on the debate concerining the CSICOP test. I'd appreciate it if you'd take a look at the draft and let me know what you think. Thanks! - Dreadlocke 01:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)