JohnTopShelf (talk | contribs) |
JohnTopShelf (talk | contribs) →Some bubble tea for you!: new WikiLove message Tag: wikilove |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
How can there ever be consensus about whether or not an article on AOC should include criticism? Her supporters, of which there appear to be many among Wikipedia editors, would never agree with inclusion of any criticism. But without inclusion of criticism, properly cited, there can be no neutral point of view.[[User:JohnTopShelf|JohnTopShelf]] ([[User talk:JohnTopShelf|talk]]) 02:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC) |
How can there ever be consensus about whether or not an article on AOC should include criticism? Her supporters, of which there appear to be many among Wikipedia editors, would never agree with inclusion of any criticism. But without inclusion of criticism, properly cited, there can be no neutral point of view.[[User:JohnTopShelf|JohnTopShelf]] ([[User talk:JohnTopShelf|talk]]) 02:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
== Some bubble tea for you! == |
|||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Bubble Tea.png|65px]] |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I see that you flagged me for edit warring. I guess that means that every time I make an edit, it is immediately reverted. Look, I am not trying to be problematic. I just believe that criticism should be allowed in articles about all politicians - whether liberal or conservative. But any time I include any criticism whatsover in the Ocasio-Cortez article, it is immediately reverted, typically within seconds, before the reverting editor could have even had time to read much of it and certainly before my cites could be checked for accuracy (they were accurate). Why the issue with including criticism? What happened to neutral point of view? or has that been replaced with consensus - meaning no edit can be included without everyone agreeing with its inclusion. As I stated before, there can be no consensus when a number of editors make blanket reversions of edits which include anything they disagree with, not because it's inaccurate or not properly cited, but simply because it presents a position unfavorable to a position they believe. Keeping criticism out of political articles, regardless of the political leanings of the subject of the article, defeats the very purpose of Wikipedia. [[User:JohnTopShelf|JohnTopShelf]] ([[User talk:JohnTopShelf|talk]]) 03:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC) |
|||
|} |
Revision as of 03:03, 14 March 2019
Welcome!
Hello, PunxtawneyPickle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\talk 02:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Some bubble tea for you!
|
Bubble tea is disgusting. That said - why did you delete my entire section "Controversy" from the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez article seconds after I added it? You obviously reverted the edit without taking time to read it and check the cites. I can only assume that you reverted the edit simply because it included criticism of this liberal darling. But politics aside, disallowing any criticism of Ms. Ocasio-Cortez violates the very foundation on which Wikipedia rests - a neutral point of view. If the only statements allowed in an article are those which are laudatory, the article becomes nothing more than a political ad. Wikipedia is supposed to be inclusive and objective. Please step back, be objective and fair-minded, and return my edit to its rightful place in the article.JohnTopShelf (talk) 02:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Some bubble tea for you!
How can there ever be consensus about whether or not an article on AOC should include criticism? Her supporters, of which there appear to be many among Wikipedia editors, would never agree with inclusion of any criticism. But without inclusion of criticism, properly cited, there can be no neutral point of view.JohnTopShelf (talk) 02:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC) Some bubble tea for you!
|