Professor Guru (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
I will add it |
I will add it |
||
*No, don't do that. We need printed, secondary sources. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 17:48, 9 February 2022 (UTC) |
*No, don't do that. We need printed, secondary sources. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 17:48, 9 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
---- |
|||
⚫ | |||
Did you look at the references? I gave 6 printed different secondary sources in Footnote 9, 13, 16, 17, 19 and 20. |
Did you look at the references? I gave 6 printed different secondary sources in Footnote 9, 13, 16, 17, 19 and 20. |
||
***Just so you're aware, [[Wikipedia:DAILYEXPRESS|the Daily Express]] and [[Wikipedia:DAILYMAIL|the Daily Mail]] are generally unreliable. Your contribution could get removed again on the basis that many of your sources are [[WP:RSP|unreliable]]. –[[User:Skywatcher68|Skywatcher68]] ([[User talk:Skywatcher68|talk]]) |
|||
***No, I didn't, because I was looking at your "original video" of a Tweet. Also, please sign your name, and stick to convention for indenting posts on talk pages. Thanks. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 01:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
--> Obviously... I do not believe that authentic and Federation of International Autosports confirmed (see reference from the FIA in the article) videos published in Mail Online and Express are "generally unreliable" sources (that's quite a sweeping statement, especially considering that good journalists with reliable sources work there and considering that BBC, The Independent and SkySports were made aware by Mail and Express about the video, the investigation and the statement by the FIA). |
--> Obviously... I do not believe that authentic and Federation of International Autosports confirmed (see reference from the FIA in the article) videos published in Mail Online and Express are "generally unreliable" sources (that's quite a sweeping statement, especially considering that good journalists with reliable sources work there and considering that BBC, The Independent and SkySports were made aware by Mail and Express about the video, the investigation and the statement by the FIA). |
||
Revision as of 01:24, 10 February 2022
January 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Murtala Muhammed, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
- Copying text from other sources
- Policy on copyright
- Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
- Policy and guideline on non-free content
If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 18:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
February 2022
Hello, I'm Skywatcher68. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Jonathan Wheatley seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:19, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- That's much better. You might want to find sources to back up Twitter in case somebody has a problem there. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:22, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
You mean the original video from where the Twitter pages got their video clip? I just found the original... https://f1tv.formula1.com/detail/1000005250/inside-story-max-s-miracle-win-in-abu-dhabi I will add it
- No, don't do that. We need printed, secondary sources. Drmies (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Uhm...
Did you look at the references? I gave 6 printed different secondary sources in Footnote 9, 13, 16, 17, 19 and 20.
- Just so you're aware, the Daily Express and the Daily Mail are generally unreliable. Your contribution could get removed again on the basis that many of your sources are unreliable. –Skywatcher68 (talk)
- No, I didn't, because I was looking at your "original video" of a Tweet. Also, please sign your name, and stick to convention for indenting posts on talk pages. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
--> Obviously... I do not believe that authentic and Federation of International Autosports confirmed (see reference from the FIA in the article) videos published in Mail Online and Express are "generally unreliable" sources (that's quite a sweeping statement, especially considering that good journalists with reliable sources work there and considering that BBC, The Independent and SkySports were made aware by Mail and Express about the video, the investigation and the statement by the FIA).
anyway... nevermind... however... I have now removed the Mail and Express articles sources and replaced them with BBC, Irish Post, and "The Independent", as well as Sky Sports articles. Cheers and kind regards,