→Hello: r |
IKnowAlotOfStuff120412 (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 415: | Line 415: | ||
Please tell me [[User:IKnowAlotOfStuff120412|IKnowAlotOfStuff120412]] ([[User talk:IKnowAlotOfStuff120412|talk]]) 23:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC) |
Please tell me [[User:IKnowAlotOfStuff120412|IKnowAlotOfStuff120412]] ([[User talk:IKnowAlotOfStuff120412|talk]]) 23:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
:Sure. I want to delete your page because you clearly don't intend it to be an encyclopedia article. As you can see, the deleting administrator ([[User:RHaworth]]) agreed. [[User:Pichpich|Pichpich]] ([[User talk:Pichpich#top|talk]]) 00:04, 4 March 2016 (UTC) |
:Sure. I want to delete your page because you clearly don't intend it to be an encyclopedia article. As you can see, the deleting administrator ([[User:RHaworth]]) agreed. [[User:Pichpich|Pichpich]] ([[User talk:Pichpich#top|talk]]) 00:04, 4 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
Please leave my stuff alone I have been bullied enough by people like you I had a different account that an admin muted me for no reason please don't bully me [[User:IKnowAlotOfStuff120412|IKnowAlotOfStuff120412]] ([[User talk:IKnowAlotOfStuff120412|talk]]) 15:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:53, 4 March 2016
Talk page threads of 2008-2009 |
Alexander Beauchamp Cameron
Hi I have updated my website as advised by wikipedia to allow the use of the material on Alexander Cameron. But I see that the page has already been deleted :( what can we do please? — Allegra Loch (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:00, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
seyed Ali Mirlohi
I added some references, I am his son and have the first hand knowledge of him N.mirlohi (talk) 03:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)NM
Thank you for the Acq Intel review
As a part-time contributor I appreciate the review. Sweerek (talk) 14:22, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
H. M. Harwood
Thank you! — Robert Greer (talk) 21:34, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Vargas Von Tullio
Hello Pichpich, you have recently put a vandalism tag on my "Vargas Von Tullio" page. I am sorry that I kept on deleting it. I was lying about Vargas Von Tullio and I feel guilty about that. Vargas Von Tullio is a made-up name. I wish to keep the page for personal purposes, but I will delete the inappropriate parts of the article and any other section that offends people/that is against the Wikipedia rules. I admire your ability to do the right thing. This idea was originally from a show "How I Met Your Mother" and I wanted to make a cool made-up name of my own and a website for myself, but my family is going through a tough time financially and I personally am saving for college so I am not able to pay for a website and a server myself. I was planning on putting a picture of myself on the article so my friends may see and be humored. My friends think of me as a magician and comedian. They are always telling me to show them a magic trick or show them something cool. I love cheering people up and making people feel good about themselves and everything else! You would do a great favor if will let me keep the article "Vargas Von Tullio", to entertain my friends, of course I will change it to a G-rated article. ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genius and Tomato Soup (talk • contribs) 01:57, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a free provider of webspace but fortunately there are many alternatives listed at Comparison of free web hosting services. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 18:43, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Oh my god, he pulled the Lorenzo von Matterhorn. Genius. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Physics0x01 (talk • contribs) 04:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Ta
muchly for tidying up my Kelman categories. --nonsense ferret 21:09, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Belinda songs
A tag has been placed on Belinda songs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Pichpich (talk) 04:52, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Lwow
Thanks for your interest in Lwów article. I hope you undid my edit in a good faith but you simply lack knowledge that is needed to describe places in Galicia region. 85.202.40.145 (talk) 14:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Please read WP:3RR. Thanks, 85.202.40.145 (talk) 14:17, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Please read Talk:Lviv#The_name_of_this_article_is_LVIV._That_is_the_name_to_be_preserved_throughout and many other threads on the talk page. The title of the article is Lviv and this name should be used pretty much throughout the article. This is a longstanding consensus and going against that consensus is disruptive and will be reverted. Pichpich (talk) 15:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- STOP EDIT WARRING. You violated the 3RR. 85.202.40.145 (talk) 15:34, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Your edits are disruptive. You're editing against a long standing consensus on the title of this article. Pichpich (talk) 15:37, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- It's just your opinion. There was a long standing consensus in the world that stated the Earth is flat. Does it prove anything? 85.202.40.145 (talk) 15:39, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- If you want to change the title of the article, by all means do start a move request but as long as the article is under the title Lviv, using Lwów throughout the article is incoherent. I invite you once again to participate in the discussions on the talk page. Pichpich (talk) 15:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- It's just your opinion. There was a long standing consensus in the world that stated the Earth is flat. Does it prove anything? 85.202.40.145 (talk) 15:39, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Your edits are disruptive. You're editing against a long standing consensus on the title of this article. Pichpich (talk) 15:37, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- STOP EDIT WARRING. You violated the 3RR. 85.202.40.145 (talk) 15:34, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Coat of Many Colours
Thanks for reviewing my two article starts this evening. Appreciated. Coat of Many Colours (talk) 21:54, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Proposal to rename
Please see my proposal to speedily rename Category: Electric power in Central African Republic to Category: Electric power in the Central African Republic Hugo999 (talk) 00:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing my mistake. I've asked directly for the deletion of the category. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 00:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Jimmy The Groundhog
Hello, I indicated on the comment for Jimmy the Groundhog that I had started with the source for the Wiarton Willie and was editing to replace Wiarton Willie information with the Jimmy the Groundhog information that I have acquired from reliable sources. I also indicated on the Jimmy the Groundhog talk page that I was currently editing the page to remove the Wiarton Willie page and add Jimmy the Groundhog information. But when I went to save the page - it had been deleted. Why did no one read the talk page and wait for me to finish adding the information that I said I was in the process of adding? Can you undelete the page so I can add the mentioned text? Thanks! Uncle uncle uncle 02:36, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Category:Terrorists by status
Hello, Pichpich - I'd appreciate it if you would take another look at the CFD for this category and give serious consideration to my counter-proposal to rename the category rather than merging/deleting. Regards, Cgingold (talk) 02:23, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Begin Again
Sorry about that, I wasn't meant to submit, was just starting one and accidentally pressed save which automatically submitted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woody286786 (talk • contribs) 02:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- ok, no worries. I have two pieces of advice: first, you should probably create KLOQ (band) before creating an article about one of their albums. Second, there's already a Begin Again (album) so your article about the KLOQ album should be under the title Begin Again (KLOQ album). Let me know if you need help with any of that. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 03:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the advise. I have created the Kloq band page. I have created it all, cited everything that needs be I believe. Just waiting for it to be reviewed. Thought I would make a start on their album. Not sure if you could take a look at that and tell me if there is anything else I could do to improve? I will also get that album name amended. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woody286786 (talk • contribs) 03:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Physics0x02-possible sockpuppet of the other one with a close name?
I just saw someone with this name on that math talk you were talking with-I think it is possible this is a sockpuppet.
Wgolf (talk) 04:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- meh, whatever. Looks like a high-schooler finding it oh-so-fun to create bogus articles. A nuisance for sure but so far not worth going through an SPI. I'll bet that he'll be bored soon enough. Pichpich (talk) 04:11, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, mate, Physics0x01 again, I'd just like you to know that my IQ has a 99% chance of being higher than both of yours and I'll most likely be making tens of thousands of dollars more than you when I graduate college. Oh, and could you check up on the contest of deletion on my article's page? I'm sure you'd appreciate it. And, chap, you might want to look up the definition of conjecture... Infact, here it is for you: "an opinion or conclusion formed on the basis of incomplete information." (Google)
My article follows the strict definition of conjecture, and therefore everything I stated in valid within wikipedia criteria and your request for deletion is bogus. Go ahead and try to get the abc conjecture deleted also, I'm sure that is also bogus. ;D
"Arguing with idiots: It's like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good you are at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it's victorious."
- I've blocked this user for harassment for 72 hours. If he continues to harass you Pichpich (or anyone else), I'll make it permanent. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, upon further thought I've just indef'd them. Odds are high that they won't make any positive contributions. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
I have a list of over 1000 proxies and I can easily make new accounts. Tokyo, I hope you don't want to lose your job as an administrator for bullshit deletions.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Physics0x02 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Sure, you could use 1000 proxies but why would you spend all that time on something that you well know will be deleted on sight? Pichpich (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the concern Physics, but I don't think that I'll lose my position here over this specific case. I wish that you would extend this much energy into finding sources for the articles that you keep trying to re-add or trying to get these RS created. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Page review
Thanks for reviewing Ryan Stassel, you should check my 2nd last page Nuclear Scandal, check if it is reviewed? OccultZone (Talk) 14:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
DJ Lantz is a sockpuppet most likely
I tagged the same page of Ed Lantz last night that was by another user who I can't remember his name. Wgolf (talk) 20:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Sha Tin Heights Tunnel
An article that you have been involved in editing, Sha Tin Heights Tunnel , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk • contributions) 10:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Please proceed with deleting unwanted 'Category' pages.
Hello Pichpich,
Please proceed with the speedy deletion of the three 'Category' pages you identified earlier, with various spellings of 'Hurdy gurdy'. (I updated each of the three talk pages earlier today, giving reasons for why they can be deleted.)
I am glad there is an automated process for deletion, as I didn't know how to delete pages. Please accept my apologies for causing this extra work.
Thank you for your help!
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee. (talk) 21:27, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gerald Brekke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Air Corps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Category:Historical geology of the Great Lakes
Category:Historical geology of the Great Lakes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 04:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
February 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Trebor Jay Tichenor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *[http://www.stlragtimers.com/ Website of the St. Louis Ragtimers]]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Lise Roel. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Ruth Lucas. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
I am not sure why you needed to jump in for the other editor; however seeing as you did, if you take a look at the history of the article you will notice that they were all "short month" style until User_talk:Ohconfucius decided to change all the dates per MOS:dates, which was incorrect and not needed. MOS:Dates states that the "Preferred" style for articles is the full month style; however for references and such, the short is perfectly fine. He agreed and changed it to the "incorrect--Current free-for-all" that it was before the changes. Please, if you are going to change a prevailing style of an article, and you run across caring editors that disagree, don't just revert (At the very least talk to the editor after you revert), as this is contrary to the way things work on Wikipedia. I will abstain from reverting again, as a show of good faith and ask why your way is better than the way that the article has been prior to the recent edits. Cheers speednat (talk) 22:35, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- I don't care about the dates in the references but for dates in the article, I think uniformity (day/month/year in this case) is important and is explicitly recommended by the MoS. Pichpich (talk) 22:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- I agree; however you never gave me a chance to state that to the orignal editor--Gaius Cornelius-- I believe. I changed, my wife booted me off the computer, and when I got back it had been reverteed. I normally would have just fixed it to my liking; however, when the majority of changes are of the type that I wish to change back (Ref. dates), I feel the onus should be on the original editor, and revert the entire edit and notify the editor. speednat (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- I made the edits in question; they were made in good faith as you indicate. I edited the article because it has a "Use dmy dates" template right at the top. My feeling is that article should be consistent with the MOS and where the MOS allows some flexibility the style of an article should be as internally consistent as possible. (That said, there are some things that have become "custom and practice" that are not explicitly mentioned in the MOS as far as I know: one of these would be no blank lines between items in a list, this being something I also changed.)
- Recently I have been formatting dates from the all-number style to spelled-out in the manner requested by a "Use xxx dates" template, all-number dates are a left over from the past when users were able to choose a date format they preferred; this was never satisfactory as was dropped some time ago. There weren't many all-number dates in this article as it turns out and the expansion of abbreviated dates was something of a side effect. Still, I would defend full dates where space allows because they are clear and consistent, and because "Wikipedia is not paper".
- I don't really have any strong feelings about this, I am just trying to make Wikipedia better. Formatting details like this are insignificant compared with the importance of dedicated contributors such as yourselves who should not have to feel that their efforts are being trampled upon nor their time wasted in fruitless arguments - so please go with whatever format you prefer.
- Happy editing. Gaius Cornelius (talk) 08:03, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of William Fishbaugh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Fishbaugh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Fishbaugh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 21:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Ways to improve Vijayawada railway division
Hi, I'm Beakermeep. Pichpich, thanks for creating Vijayawada railway division!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hello, this certainly seems like a useful article but it needs some citations :) thanks! Beakermeep(talk) 06:20, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Beakermeep(talk) 06:20, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello. I was wondering if you could look over Degan as it stands now (after a complete overhaul) and consider withdrawing your nomination at AfD? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:26, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Category:Television series by technology
Category:Television series by technology, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 20:37, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Category:Fictional witches
Hello Pichpich. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Category:Fictional witches, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Category is not empty. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 13:44, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Walled garden
I am still not sure what "walled garden" means. Is it a synonym for an orphan article with no links coming in? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 22:35, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Recursive languages and sets
The article Recursive languages and sets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- A six-year-old "temporary" content fork
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Eppstein (talk) 07:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ian Moutray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sidney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sylvia Benton, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Macedonia and Bolton High School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexander Beauchamp Cameron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bernard Castang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rugby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Withdrawal of nomination
Hi, the admin User:CambridgeBayWeather and I were wondering if you want to withdraw the AfD for Liberland, as there are quite a lot of worldwide sources for the topic now. This would speed up the process of closing the debate. Thanks in advance for your answer. - Anonimski (talk) 12:00, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Scouts Royale Brotherhood
Hi, I just recently re-added the Scouts Royale Brotherhood page, because no one was maintaining it years ago. It would have been best if you let the page hold for awhile since I am regathering the sources. If the fraternity's website is not reliable, then what is. It does not really have a publication like the older fraternities in the Philippines. Junjimalaza (talk) 05:39, 21 May 2015 (UTC)Junjimalaza
Orphaned non-free image File:CD Tatu Show Me Love.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CD Tatu Show Me Love.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:15, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacques Sernas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
My RfA
Thank for !voting at my recent RfA. You voted Support so you get a whopping three cookies, fresh from the oven! |
Unsourced death date
What's your source that Daniel Quinn died on July 4, 2015? This has been discussed multiple times, in multiple places, including WP:BLPN, and I'm honestly getting tired of reverting the change. So, I'm just going ask how you know he died July 4. If you're going off the IMDb, then that's not a reliable source. Please see Talk:Daniel Quinn (actor). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:55, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
- Reply of sorts on Talk:Daniel Quinn (actor). Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 19:43, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
How are you?
Hi Pichpich,
I saw that you contributed to the talk page on the Duarte Pio article and seeing your username reminded me of when I first joined wikipedia. I dont know if you remember, but we interacted a lot back then (my username was Lumastan), but it was often because of my misconduct here on wiki haha. I just wanted to say hello and ask how are you?
Cristiano Tomás (talk) 00:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Of course I remember! Nice to see that you're still active around here. But I knew that because I still have your talkpage on my watchlist (not that I'm stalking you of course!). Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 02:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Atul Srivastava
- Delete, a handful of minor roles, but doesn't come close to WP:NACTOR in my view. I'm sympathetic to the argument that it's usually harder to find written information on Indian topics than Western ones, but when it's a BLP we're talking about, caution is called for. Subject must have played minor and supporting roles in various films and TV shows, but fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Mentioned only in passing in cited media articles (which themselves are mostly second-tier sources), and I couldn't locate anything more comprehensive. I saw the references but it doesn't talk about Atul Srivastava particularly. This is fake article, should be immediately deleted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atul_Srivastava David 06:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManishSrivastava1 (talk • contribs)
Reference errors on 22 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Oscar Lukefahr page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). ( | )
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Re: The D
Hi. I restored dick (slang) to The D disambiguation page as I think this sense is a notable slang term. If you disagree, I'm happy to discuss here or at Talk:The D, of course. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:33, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fred Besana (baseball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roseville High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Imagin Photos
Kind of confused as to why the page for "Imagin Photos" was flagged. I noticed the reason for deletion is due to lack of notoriety, which, though this may be the case, does not mean it was falsely misrepresented or that it's an advertising ploy (as indicated by another user). I created the page as per Wikipedia guidelines (references included) to introduce a new application (which isn't going anywhere, by the way). So yeah, I appreciate everything you do and would also appreciate if you could verify the links and the integrity of the information itself. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesjmann (talk • contribs) 02:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Bland (American football coach), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cotton Bowl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you...
Thank you for helping me, that was nice. CCC IE (talk) 21:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm UkPaolo. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Rhoose fc, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 18:42, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean. Clearly this was a candidate for speedy deletion and in fact it has just been deleted as such. Pichpich (talk) 18:46, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
- My apologies, I'm not sure what happened here – I was reviewing pages listed for speedy deletion & intended to delete, but seemingly and inadvertently listed it as unreviewed (and I didn't even realise a talk page msg was generated in that scenario!). Too many tabs open at once, I think. Anyway – sorry for the confusion! └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 18:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Mhym. You recently tagged Heinz-Otto Kreiss as a recent death. Can you provide a link for that claim and, hopefully, a more precise date of death? I have been unable to find such a source online so for the time being, I'm removing your tag. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 22:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- I know, I couldn't find public information either. This is from an email I received which was sent to a large mathematics community. I think template can serve as a "wait and see" placeholder - soon enough "in memoriam" articles will appear on the web. Mhym (talk) 05:06, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Season's Greetings!
- Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message
- Thanks. Best wishes back! Pichpich (talk) 01:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Pichpich!
- Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Your comment on Trap Mafia page
Non-intelligent Wikipedia user. As a Producer in Trap Mafia, Mvrino, I'll be first to say, PichPich, you are absolutely incorrect about the allegations you are preceding to make. You're honestly wasting your time. Trap Mafia Beatz is legit. We are active on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Youtube, and Snapchat where our presence is greatly felt. You don't know what you're talking about. You are very un-informed in music production obviously. A "type beat" on YouTube is not an "un-solicited YouTube remix". It is simply a "type beat". A TYPE of BEAT influenced by an artist or producer of higher ranking. Hence the video labels "808 Mafia x Future type beat". They influenced the beat, they are not a part of the beats creation. Also, our websites are NOT dead. They were under construction at the time you attempted to use the links. Click the links now. They'll take you right to our sites where you can purchase and/or listen to a wide array of beats. Don't ever claim that we are "non-notable". We have a lot of credit in this industry. And anyone who is mentioned in our production credits on that Wikipedia page, we HAVE worked with. The is no need to lie about it. I have contact to the artists and producers myself. And I'll contact them for you if you need further "dumbing-down" of this altercation. Congratulations PichPich, you've wasted your time. Have a good day.
- At the end of the day, you have to show that Trap Mafia meets the notability criterion of Wikipedia and I have yet to see significant coverage of Trap Mafia in reliable, third-party sources. I am definitely open to changing my mind if you can provide signs of that. Pichpich (talk) 17:22, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- [[User:Trap Mafia Beatz|Trap Mafia Beatz] Also since we are so "non-notable" how about you look up our songs. Here is every song that we have with our credited artists: Costra Nostra Yayo - Everyday ft. Strap Da Fool (of Travis Porter) [Prod. By Trap Mafia] | Go Yayo - Scando [Prod. By Trap Mafia] | Go Yayo - Big Homie [Prod. By Trap Mafia] | Cosa Nostra Kidd - Holy Moly ft. Skooly [Prod. By Cosa Nostra Beats of Trap Mafia] | Young Goldie - MMM [Prod. By Cosa Nostra Beats of Trap Mafia] | Costra Nostra Kidd - Stop Cappin' ft. Street Money Boochie [Prod. By Cosa Nostra Beats of Trap Mafia] | Jiggy Jaxx - Runnin' Thru These Bandz ft. Asco100k [Prod. By Roscoe Beatz of Trap Mafia] | Trula Gang - On My Head [Prod. By Trap Mafia] (206.127.141.20 (talk) 14:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC))
That is hard proof of all of our credits. YouTube, Soundcloud, Google. Look them up. Since this is such a big deal. I am new to Wiki. I don't know how to get my page to look all fancy. Give me a break. My page will not be deleted because I have proven our notability. Are you happy now? Dear lord above! If it's not one thing its another. I've proven you wrong in terms of notability. So there's nothing left to discuss between us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassanfurrwiki (talk • contribs) 14:45, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Let me reiterate that the issue here is that Trap Mafia has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The list above does not address this issue. Note that notability is not inherited and in any case, it's not clear that any of the artists above are notable to start with. Finally, let me remind you that you are currently editing with a conflict of interest. Wikipedia is not a social networking service or free web host and you can't create "Wikipedia presence" like you create "Facebook/Instagram/Twitter/YouTube presence". Pichpich (talk) 18:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing Old Khiva Hotel, Pichpich.
Unfortunately NearEMPTiness has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
Thank you for uploading the article about the Old Khiva Hotel. At the moment it is still too short in comparison with other articles. Do you have a photograph? Is this a historic place, which is worth being mentioned in an encyclopedia?
To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.
Smoking rocket
Hi how do I stop the smoking rocket page being deleted, I'm the director and we have been feature on adverts built sites for famous athletes and won lots of awards I just need to know how to edit it correctly and stop it being deleted. BarrypTitmas (talk) 20:04, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi. What you need is coverage of your firm in multiple reliable third-party sources. If no such coverage exists, then your company is not considered sufficiently notable for an article on Wikipedia. Note that the overwhelming majority of companies are indeed not notable. However, if you can find sufficiently solid sources, I'll be happy to help you build the article (or rebuild it if it has already been deleted). Best, Pichpich (talk) 20:13, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Category:Establishments in Czechoslovakia by century has been nominated for discussion
Category:Establishments in Czechoslovakia by century, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Torrini (jeweller), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silverware (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting my RfA
Brianhe RfA Appreciation award | |
Thank you for participating at my RfA. Your support was very much appreciated even if I did get a bit scorched. Brianhe (talk) 07:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC) |
Capybara (software)
Hi,
Gaurav and I created an article titled 'Capybara (software)' today and we noticed that you reviewed the article and deleted most of it's content. We understand that you did it in a good faith and in accordance with the Wikipedia rules. Being neophytes on Wikipedia, we did few mistakes in writing the article and we thank you for pointing us into the right direction. We have read the article 'Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not' and have realised what was wrong in the article. That being said, we believe that apart from some technical details, there were parts in our article that were not exactly 'how-to' instructions. We also added categories to the article, linked the page to other Wiki pages so that it is no longer an orphan page, and provided proper citations and references. Is it okay if we just remove the information which is more like instructions from all the section and keep other information as it is, and may be add a couple of sections (of course in line with the Wiki rules again) ? Your feedback on this is much appreciated.
Thanks, Ketanjani21 (talk) 04:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think any part of the content I deleted is appropriate. There's another fundamental issue that you should tackle before expanding the article: I still see little if any indication that the software is notable (in the Wikipedia sense of the term). The priority should be to find reliable third-party coverage of the software. If such coverage is lacking, the article will probably be deleted. Pichpich (talk) 19:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- The software is notable. It is commonly used with Ruby on Rails, Rails website lists it (alongside about 10 alternatives). There are high profile Ruby on Rails tutorials that choose to focus on Capybara. It would be good to find a Capybara book, though, which is not hard either https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=capybara+ruby. The authors of the article have to support the notability with citations, no question about that, but I think the page should not be deleted quickly. TvojaStara (talk) 21:07, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello
Hello may I ask you why you are trying to get my page deleted IKnowAlotOfStuff120412 (talk) 23:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Please tell me IKnowAlotOfStuff120412 (talk) 23:53, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sure. I want to delete your page because you clearly don't intend it to be an encyclopedia article. As you can see, the deleting administrator (User:RHaworth) agreed. Pichpich (talk) 00:04, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Please leave my stuff alone I have been bullied enough by people like you I had a different account that an admin muted me for no reason please don't bully me IKnowAlotOfStuff120412 (talk) 15:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)