Master of the Oríchalcos (talk | contribs) →Response: wording |
Master of the Oríchalcos (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 181: | Line 181: | ||
== Response == |
== Response == |
||
Hi, Physicq210, thank you for your comments on [[WP:ANI]]. I've seen the discussion at [[User_talk:Certified.Gangsta#This_is_bullshit]]. I could respond to the false accusations made by Certified.Gangsta on his talk page but he has a history of removing comments from his talk page. I request we keep this discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Ban-Evasion]]. Thanks. [[User:LionheartX|LionheartX]] 06:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC) |
Hi, Physicq210, thank you for your comments on [[WP:ANI]]. I've seen the discussion at [[User_talk:Certified.Gangsta#This_is_bullshit]]. I could respond to the false accusations made by Certified.Gangsta on his talk page point by point but he has a history of removing comments from his talk page. I request that we keep this discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Ban-Evasion]]. Thanks. [[User:LionheartX|LionheartX]] 06:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:02, 8 March 2007
Welcome!
Hello, physicq210, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Bachrach44 01:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Need Help
I am a Wikipedia newbie and need help on getting the entry for our company undeleted? Its the one for "Infrant" Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infrant (talk • contribs)
Jumpaclass
This is an invitation to use WP:BAY's Jumpaclass option for improving articles. If you're working on any Bay Area-related stub, start, or B-class articles, simply add their names to the list, and if any of the articles improve a class within a week, you'll be recognized for your contributions. Thanks for reading! — Emiellaiendiay 21:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Is this users actions allowed?
- Hey there (:O) ... we have an ongoing debate over here on the status of an article. Now the thing I wanted to bring up was the editing and removal and well forceful rhetoric stating the result of the debate before it has even been decided. The one causing all this is User:Ideogram. I have tried so hard to be loving and understanding during this debate, but now I dont know if what the user is doing is right or wrong. I dont know who to go to, so I figure I may ask someone who is very familiar with the wikipedia world and how this should be dealt with maybe? Not sure. Please help. (:O) ---nima baghaei (talk) 03:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Good luck
I just saw your Wikibreak notice and wanted to wish you good luck, in case you see this before your competition. Regards, Newyorkbrad 03:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
U.S. Roads Newsletter Issue #2
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
Apologies for the late delivery. Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 9 | 26 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
Three users temporarily desysopped after wheel war | Peppers article stays deleted |
Pro golfer sues over libelous statements | Report from the Norwegian (Bokmål) Wikipedia |
WikiWorld comic: "Pet skunk" | News and notes: New arbitrators appointed, milestones |
Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
problems with user 70.23.*.*
Hi Physicq210 - I saw that you have had problems with the same anonymous user I've had long-standing problems with on the Nadine Gordimer article and now on Bailey v. Alabama. (User talk:70.23.199.239, previously User talk:70.23.177.216.) The user persistently reverts without ever addressing substantive comments; when the user does engage in discussion it does so with considerable incivility and accusations of censorship, personal motivation, and so on. I was starting to try to figure out the next step in dealing with this person, who for 3 or 4 months now has just been disruptive on Nadine Gordimer (and it appears, from looking at his history), on other articles as well. But I've been blindsided by a family crisis, so I'm hoping for a little help in figuring out what to do. If you know the next step in the process -- mediation? arbitration? -- I'd be happy to take it (next week). But I'm very tired of having to spend time reverting frankly racist insertions on these articles (and documenting it), which takes my time away from doing more meaningful things, and discourages other editors from also contributing constructively. Help? --lquilter 16:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Survey Invitation
Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 03:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me
More Issues at James Buchanan
If you could take a look at James Buchanan, I would appreciate it. Someone is reverting my edits to reinsert material sourced only to Lies Across America--a Kitty Kelly-style gossip rag book--and a Salon opinion piece. Neither qualifies as reliable under WP:RS, but the reverter seems not to care. Your attention to this matter would be appreciated.K. Scott Bailey 17:48, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- It is very important that you take a look at this article. There is some kind of duo tag-teaming me in order (in my view) to avoid WP:3RR. The sooner you can take a look at it, the better off the article will be.K. Scott Bailey 02:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 10 | 5 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
New Yorker correction dogs arbitrator into departure | WikiWorld comic: "The Rutles" |
News and notes: Picture of the Year, milestones | Features and admins |
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News | The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Username violation
Users are prevented from registering usernames that reference religious figures (e.g., Jesus, Krishna, Allah, etc.). However, usernames that contain those names are not necessarily violations, as in this case. -- Merope 04:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Response
Hi, Physicq210, thank you for your comments on WP:ANI. I've seen the discussion at User_talk:Certified.Gangsta#This_is_bullshit. I could respond to the false accusations made by Certified.Gangsta on his talk page point by point but he has a history of removing comments from his talk page. I request that we keep this discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Ban-Evasion. Thanks. LionheartX 06:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)