Rewolftime (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
PhilKnight (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by Rewolftime (talk) to last version by PhilKnight |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
This is in regards to the Calavo Growers page that I edited. We are a group of students enrolled in a Communication class at our University, and we have been assigned the Calavo Growers page to edit. All of the information we are adding is confirmed off of the Calavo Growers own page. Please do not revert this back to the previous format for the next two weeks, as we are trying to preserve this content for our presentation. We really appreciate your cooperation, and thank you in advance. |
This is in regards to the Calavo Growers page that I edited. We are a group of students enrolled in a Communication class at our University, and we have been assigned the Calavo Growers page to edit. All of the information we are adding is confirmed off of the Calavo Growers own page. Please do not revert this back to the previous format for the next two weeks, as we are trying to preserve this content for our presentation. We really appreciate your cooperation, and thank you in advance. |
||
Thanks for unblocking[[User:Rewolftime|Rewolftime]] ([[User talk:Rewolftime|talk]]) 11:28, 20 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Sincerely, |
Sincerely, |
Revision as of 11:42, 20 September 2014
![]() Archives |
---|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114
|
ip 208.90.107.160
hi paul. we're in a computer class at a community college and we made a mistake and accidentally clicked on the edit link and did not intend to make any changes to the page you msg us about. reference -- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:208.90.107.160&redirect=no
sorry for the trouble — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.90.107.160 (talk) 16:26, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- No problem. PhilKnight (talk) 16:55, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Calavo Growers Page
Dear Mr. Knight,
This is in regards to the Calavo Growers page that I edited. We are a group of students enrolled in a Communication class at our University, and we have been assigned the Calavo Growers page to edit. All of the information we are adding is confirmed off of the Calavo Growers own page. Please do not revert this back to the previous format for the next two weeks, as we are trying to preserve this content for our presentation. We really appreciate your cooperation, and thank you in advance.
Sincerely,
Calavo Growers Project Group — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lexi Chase (talk • contribs) 18:31, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- No, that isn't how this works. You can't just copy content from the Calavo Growers home page into the Wikipedia article. You should be adding content from reliable sources. Have a look at the links below:
- You should be using searches such as these to find reliably sourced content to add to the article. And even then, you should be adding content in your own words, which complies with Wikipedia's core policies, such as the Neutral Point of View. PhilKnight (talk) 18:37, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
News socks of banned sock-master
Hi Paul. Banned sock-master Tirgil34 (talk · contribs) who systematically has been vandalising the particular articles-(since 2012) is created new accounts after the last block. I noticed these accounts. Please check them per WP:DUCK:
- Kervani (talk · contribs)
- Gashgali (talk · contribs)
- Hétmagyarom (talk · contribs)
- Mountaindwellerman (talk · contribs)
- Snaitniom (talk · contribs)
- Egaplaicesp (talk · contribs)
- Éredet (talk · contribs)
- Iraquirs (talk · contribs)
and 89.204.../82.113...ip ranges belong to the same sock-master.
All of these accounts are edited the same articles with Tirgil34 and their additions are very similar to banned sock-master Tirgil's. And interestingly, although all these accounts are new, they edit/act like an experienced editor.
And this ip also likely used by Tirgil34. IP doesn't geolocate to Germany where Tirgil 's other ips geolocated but my suspicions are based on behavior. And also, I think this IP is from an ip-hider software and is using for socking purposes. 149.140.46.188 (talk) 12:50, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hi anon, I suggest you file a report at WP:SPI. PhilKnight (talk) 14:07, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Phil, I have reported them but I cannot see my report on WP:SPI. 149.140.46.188 (talk) 14:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hello. I blanked the talk page of the case where you added your evidence. Since the case already exists, you may copy this content (except the edit semi protected template and note, of course) directly to the bottom of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tirgil34. Best —DoRD (talk) 15:06, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks. 149.140.46.188 (talk) 15:16, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Phil, I have reported them but I cannot see my report on WP:SPI. 149.140.46.188 (talk) 14:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello
No i have to admit i tried to do so on a purpose because i am having a poblem when others keep deleting my article and i do not undertand why... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kumbo2009 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Kumbo2009
fair enough i do not intend any harm... but i just do not get it. how come some articles are just deleted within seconds, you cnat hardly know anything about it... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kumbo2009 (talk • contribs) 21:49, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Smart Homes
Hi there. My edit to the Smart Homes page was because the text there was an advertisement. I don't know how to nominate a page for deletion or to set up a redirect. If anything, Smart Home should redirect to Home Automation, which is a very good article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.195.84.122 (talk) 13:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- The previous editor to you made a number of unhelpful changes, which I've reverted. Also, I've added {{mergeto|Home Automation}} to the article. PhilKnight (talk) 13:57, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Kalyandurg
Your revert was right at Kalyandurg as the user providing unsourced info and some sentences are already stated in the page.-> revert.--Vin09 (talk) 14:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for explaining. PhilKnight (talk) 15:54, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
youngStartup Ventures
Hi Mr. Knight,
I appreciate you reverting my corrections on the youngStartup Ventures page as didn't realize the article contained formatting errors. Can I please ask you to point me in the right direction as to how I can correct those errors.
Thanks, Joe Joe Benjamin (talk) 14:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Given the extent of your conflict of interest, you shouldn't be editing the article. PhilKnight (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello Mr. Knight,
Perhaps you can help me with a challenge I'm having.
You see Mr. Knight, the article currently up there places my company in an artificially negative light and is actively doing damage to my business. I certainly understand and respect policies designed to keep biased parties from polluting Wikipedia, but surely the damaging of an individual's business runs counter to the purpose of Wikipedia.
In the name of protecting an innocent individual's business, can I please ask you to either post the neutral facts about my business yourself and/or to allow me to post them?
Thank you in advance, Joe Benjamin Joe Benjamin (talk) 15:39, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- I suggest you post your concerns on the article talk page. PhilKnight (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
I hear what you're saying. No sense in trying to get around the procedures, right. I've done that (posted on the talk page) and I'm sure everything will be rectified soon enough. Thank you so much for your help Mr. Knight.
Joe Joe Benjamin (talk) 19:58, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Lol! I'm blocked :-P
What a joke!! You told that the block was for 48 hours.. But ists not 24 hour also.. and I am able editing. :-P — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.252.1.148 (talk) 02:08, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hey, Phil, I blocked the above IP for one week. I assumed it was block evasion, but at the time of the block I hadn't yet probed deeply enough to verify that. I then found the other IP you blocked for 48 hours, which is obviously the same person, 36.252.1.147 (talk · contribs · count). I increased "your" IP's block to one week from now so they matched, and I blocked talk page access for both of them. Somehow, I have a feeling we're not done, but I suppose one step at a time.--Bbb23 (talk) 03:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Bbb23. Thanks for explaining, as well as blocking the IP. PhilKnight (talk) 08:38, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Please protect 2014–15 Liga I
I made a request to WP:RFPP since yesterday but there is no action so far... User:FCSTEAUABUCURESTISA also broke 3RR rule (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:FCSTEAUABUCURESTISA_reported_by_User:Shocate_.28Result:_.29). Me and User:Eddie Nixon are having serious problems with him. Shocate (talk) 08:54, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- The official name o CSMS Iasi is "CS Municipal Studentesc Iaşi (IS)", read this on the FRF (the governing body of football in Romania) official web site here, on this page abbreviations are not a allowed, if you want to add please add to all Liga I football teams, not only this team. You don't understand that is same thing with another football team FC Sportul Studentesc Bucuresti. The name of this team was FCSS Bucuresti or Sportul Studentesc Bucuresti??? Team name on the official website is C.S. Municipal Studentesc Iasi- click here can see on top page the banner. 09:15, 17 September 2014 (UTC) User:FCSTEAUABUCURESTISA
- Any objections to page protection while you resolve this disagreement? PhilKnight (talk) 09:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
New to Wikpedia
Sir, I am new to Wikipedia and after reading out the help article I am having some doubts about the process of contributing articles to Wikipedia. Is this the right place to seek help? Otherwise, please refer me to some admin who can help me. Thanks.Trailbust (talk) 12:42, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- DoRD CU blocked this account. I had started to spend some time trying to help get him a TeaHouse invite but didn't finish. Dougweller (talk) 14:44, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Irish schools vandalism
I've blocked quite a few IP addresses such as 87.32.64.205 in the last 24 hours, all from HEAnet[1] - more than I've seen before in such a short time from one educational network. Dougweller (talk) 12:44, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Freedom Airlines
Phil, I was fixing a mistake. I actually worked for Freedom and we did NOT lease the CRJ-900's for 1 million dollars each. It was $1.00 per aircraft per month. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BJFeldbauer (talk) 00:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hi BJFeldbauer, thanks for explaining. PhilKnight (talk) 00:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
September 2014 - Admin Barnstar
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Thanks for making the unblock decision you made on Viriditas' talkpage. LHMask me a question 17:56, 18 September 2014 (UTC) |
- Thanks LHM, you're too generous. PhilKnight (talk) 22:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
I would have given you a barnstar myself if you had discussed it with the blocking admin first. Chillum Need help? Type {{ping|Chillum}} 17:59, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, I guess that would've been better. PhilKnight (talk) 22:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Nobody is perfect. I can see your point of view and I think you acted well as an uninvolved admin. Chillum Need help? Type {{ping|Chillum}} 23:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the unblock, PhilKnight. Viriditas (talk) 22:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- No problem. PhilKnight (talk) 22:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Do you have any suggestions on how to move forward? I see by your user page that you have experience with mediation and dispute resolution. I have several concerns. Viriditas (talk) 23:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Given the page is now protected under the rationale of "Material removed under BLP should not be restored without prior consensus", the next stage should be a discussion on the talk page to clearly establish consensus. Also, it's possible there should be a discussion at WT:BLP about clarifying the WP:BLPSOURCES section. PhilKnight (talk) 16:07, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Do you have any suggestions on how to move forward? I see by your user page that you have experience with mediation and dispute resolution. I have several concerns. Viriditas (talk) 23:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)