→Ban lifted: question |
Pasdecomplot (talk | contribs) →Ban lifted: format Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
Line 190: | Line 190: | ||
:'' "Pasdecomplot, that is correct. Usedtobecool, your wisdom is, as always, appreciated. Pasdecomplot, please take note. El_C 18:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)" '' [[User:Pasdecomplot|Pasdecomplot]] ([[User talk:Pasdecomplot#top|talk]]) 07:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
:'' "Pasdecomplot, that is correct. Usedtobecool, your wisdom is, as always, appreciated. Pasdecomplot, please take note. El_C 18:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)" '' [[User:Pasdecomplot|Pasdecomplot]] ([[User talk:Pasdecomplot#top|talk]]) 07:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
{{Ping|Cullen328|El_C}} I do not have time today to file a repeat AN/I report, but the continued [[Special:Diff/981132573|assertions of "bad faith"]], as well as the intentionally misleading [[Special:Diff/981136217|characterization]] of an unrelated feuding block applied to myself (that never spread to [[Yarchen Gar]]) is intolerable. They were warned by multiple users to cease with the "vandalism" (and associated "bad faith" accusations), as well as [[Special:Diff/978558968|by Cullen]] of the consequences of repeating said misbehavior. <span style="color: #8B0000">Caradhras</span>Aiguo (<small>[[User talk:CaradhrasAiguo|leave language]]</small>) 15:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC) |
::{{Ping|Cullen328|El_C}} I do not have time today to file a repeat AN/I report, but the continued [[Special:Diff/981132573|assertions of "bad faith"]], as well as the intentionally misleading [[Special:Diff/981136217|characterization]] of an unrelated feuding block applied to myself (that never spread to [[Yarchen Gar]]) is intolerable. They were warned by multiple users to cease with the "vandalism" (and associated "bad faith" accusations), as well as [[Special:Diff/978558968|by Cullen]] of the consequences of repeating said misbehavior. <span style="color: #8B0000">Caradhras</span>Aiguo (<small>[[User talk:CaradhrasAiguo|leave language]]</small>) 15:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Pasdecomplot, where is the evidence of the "bad faith" that you mentioned in your edit summary? Your answer better be a good one. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 16:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC) |
:::Pasdecomplot, where is the evidence of the "bad faith" that you mentioned in your edit summary? Your answer better be a good one. [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 16:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
==Disambiguation link notification for September 28== |
==Disambiguation link notification for September 28== |
Revision as of 18:14, 1 October 2020
Welcome!
|
Pasdecomplot, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Pasdecomplot! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 1 June 2020 (UTC) |
So sweet, and I'll rsvp as yes. Pasdecomplot (talk) 21:29, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Hi Pasdecomplot! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Image without license
Unspecified source/license for File:--11th Panchen Lama controversy--.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:--11th Panchen Lama controversy--.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}}
(to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 01:45, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
"aligning left for easier reading again"
Hi. FYI: {{outdent}} or {{od}} will create an out-dented reply, that looks this:
A message
- A reply
- Another reply
- Another reply
- Another reply
- It's getting crowded over here
- Another reply
- Another reply
- Another reply
Outdented reply after {{od}}
- new intended reply to that
- another reply
A new thread having nothing to do with the above
- a reply to that
Also, typing four hyphens "----" will create a horizontal rule, like this:
And that lets you separate off one section from another. It's somewhere in between outdenting and starting a new subheader.
There's a script called WP:REPLYLINK that makes all this much easier. If you haven't already, go to preference->gadgets and check the box for "Install scripts without having to edit JavaScript files", which will activate the script installer button. Then go to WP:REPLYLINK and click "install". You'll then see a "reply" button after talk page comments, and you can click "reply" and write your message in the box, and it takes care of all the indenting for you so yo don't have to worry about it. Reply link was written by a volunteer editor and isn't perfect; in some threads it doesn't work; but most of the time it does work and makes communicating much, much easier. (There are lots of other scripts you also might find useful, listed at WP:USL.)
Oh and if you're wondering why we're using 1980s technology to communicate, see WP:FLOW and the links therein. HTH Levivich [dubious – discuss] 17:27, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
So cool. Really challenged by using a mobile system - makes looking for proper editing code while editing tough, especially w/o PC perks. Thanks Levivich! Pasdecomplot (talk) 17:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oh I didn't even notice you are editing on mobile. Bless your heart, that makes everything significantly more difficult! Levivich [dubious – discuss] 17:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- I hate editing by smartphone, especially when it decides all by itself to switch on predictive text (ugh) and I haven't noticed. You might find this an interesting read. GirthSummit (blether) 12:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks GirthSummit and Levivich. Must always remember to disable auto-correct! I'll read the piece. Pasdecomplot (talk) 17:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Le quagmire
wish to protect account from hijacking while gone. Pasdecomplot (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Make sure you have a strong password and enable Meta:2fa Praxidicae (talk) 14:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Praxidicae. Worried about it due to recent login bizzarities, assuming from the internet connection. Pasdecomplot (talk) 16:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
mobile editing
Hey, Pasdecomplot, I know you're taking a sabbatical but, for when you get back: an editor who edits often on his device recommends not using the mobile site or the app but instead the desktop site, which you can get to by scrolling down to the bottom of any article. He has an essay about smartphone editing at User:Cullen328/Smartphone editing. I think it's possible using the mobile site or the app, combined with unfamiliarity with the desktop site, might have caused issues that then caused a communications disconnect between you and other editors, including me, and if that's true I apologize. Best to you. —valereee (talk) 12:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- If your apology —valereee is for repeatedly redirecting George Floyd talk page discussions of important content edits which needlessly harassed a new editor, then for continuing by pushing for a BLP ban, for three months, for format issues such as tabbing but not based on content issues, then I accept. But I hesitate to even respond since a response could illicit further harassment.
Your help desk question
You did not get a response to this question. If you have a problem like that again, report it at WP:VPT.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:57, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Vchimpanzee • talk
Thank you for your diligence
Hi Pasdecomplot,
Thank you for your edit expanding the section "20th century" on the Tibetan Buddhism page. It's important those of us familiar with Tibetan Buddhism and Maoist China work together. Time is precious, and so we need to support each other... There is a very real and current danger to our teachings and methods, and that is Chinese manipulation. You should know both OTD and TTD want the same thing - that is to unite the Karma Kagyu lineage. Let it unfold with time, and it will. Skillfully. Have confidence. You don't need to rush. Understand that there are and were very real dangers to the lives of both OTD and TTD and their families. China would have its way and kill both of them. Many high lamas have been killed. For this reason a lot of information has to be kept in secrecy. This means you and I don't know the full story regarding, and don't need to. Dharma is intact. Each of us needs to work together, and not create unnecessary work for each other. We have busy lives, and editing on wikipedia is noble work. All best wishes, Badabara (talk) 07:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
@Badabara Thanks for the positive wishes! Working in unison is always easier than working in conflict, but Mr Floyd went way overboard... Regards. Pasdecomplot (talk) 00:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:--11th Panchen Lama controversy--.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:--11th Panchen Lama controversy--.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- A bad faith revert deleted the image, which is offered by International Campaign for Tibet as a tool to help the international community locate the subject of the photo. The bad faith edit orphaned the file temporarily. Posted since 15 June, a bot search previously did not discover any copyright. Curious the bot says it's copyrighted after the bad faith revert, but not before. Thanks. Pasdecomplot (talk) 11:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- And this is what I'm talking about. Everyone has told you Caradhras' edits were not bad faith, and yet you are intent on repeating they were, which is a personal attack on them, which can lose you access to your talk page, which will surprise absolutely no one but you if it happens. I'd advise you to strike that comment. Also you're talking to a bot. —valereee (talk) 11:56, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Ban lifted
"Just so I adhere properly @El_C, the 28 September is when the ban on BLP parameters is lifted? And I'll be careful. Yipee! Pasdecomplot (talk) 17:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)"
- "Pasdecomplot, that is correct. Usedtobecool, your wisdom is, as always, appreciated. Pasdecomplot, please take note. El_C 18:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)" Pasdecomplot (talk) 07:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Cullen328 and El C: I do not have time today to file a repeat AN/I report, but the continued assertions of "bad faith", as well as the intentionally misleading characterization of an unrelated feuding block applied to myself (that never spread to Yarchen Gar) is intolerable. They were warned by multiple users to cease with the "vandalism" (and associated "bad faith" accusations), as well as by Cullen of the consequences of repeating said misbehavior. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 15:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Pasdecomplot, where is the evidence of the "bad faith" that you mentioned in your edit summary? Your answer better be a good one. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 16:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Cullen328 and El C: I do not have time today to file a repeat AN/I report, but the continued assertions of "bad faith", as well as the intentionally misleading characterization of an unrelated feuding block applied to myself (that never spread to Yarchen Gar) is intolerable. They were warned by multiple users to cease with the "vandalism" (and associated "bad faith" accusations), as well as by Cullen of the consequences of repeating said misbehavior. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 15:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2008 Tibetan unrest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aba.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- repaired. Pasdecomplot (talk) 00:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Image without license
Unspecified source/license for File:Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, 6 yrs & 30 yrs.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, 6 yrs & 30 yrs.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}}
(to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 01:46, 30 September 2020 (UTC)