RashersTierney (talk | contribs) Notice: We use consensus, not voting. (TW) |
John Quincy Adding Machine (talk | contribs) →Stop: new section |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your comments. Please note that on Wikipedia, [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] is determined by [[Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion|discussion, not voting]], and it is the quality of arguments that counts, not the number of people supporting a position. Consider reading about the [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]] for a brief overview for the deletion process, and how we decide what to keep and what to delete. We hope you decide to stay and contribute even more. Thank you! <!-- Template:Uw-notvote --> ''Mass reverting of consensus edits is unlikely to result in a new consensus and may be considered disruptive. Please re-consider your behavior on passport-related articles.'' [[User:RashersTierney|RashersTierney]] ([[User talk:RashersTierney|talk]]) 17:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your comments. Please note that on Wikipedia, [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] is determined by [[Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion|discussion, not voting]], and it is the quality of arguments that counts, not the number of people supporting a position. Consider reading about the [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]] for a brief overview for the deletion process, and how we decide what to keep and what to delete. We hope you decide to stay and contribute even more. Thank you! <!-- Template:Uw-notvote --> ''Mass reverting of consensus edits is unlikely to result in a new consensus and may be considered disruptive. Please re-consider your behavior on passport-related articles.'' [[User:RashersTierney|RashersTierney]] ([[User talk:RashersTierney|talk]]) 17:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Stop == |
|||
Stop edit warring and return to discussion please. Have you read what has been raised at [[Talk:Passport]]? Consensus need not be unanimous. —[[User talk:Happenstance|<font color="teal">''what a crazy random happenstance''</font>]] 01:36, 26 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:36, 26 January 2010
Saudi passports
Thank you for you note on my talk page. I know that there was talk about abolishing visa-on-arrival for citizens of Gulf countries. However the Turkish embassy site in London still lists Saudi Arabians among those that can get the visa on arrival (see [1]). Do you have any official site which shows that this facility has been abolished for Saudi passport holders ?
- I also check timatic [2] and it lists the planned date for the abolition of the facility as November 1, 2009. I.e. it most likely hasn't taken effect yet. When and if it does, I will change the page to reflect this. Passportguy (talk) 16:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hello. Thanks for your message.
Unfortunately, I have no such an official site which approves abolishing of those 'on arrival' visas for Gulf countries. I've seen that only on timatic website. It writes same thing (as November 1, 2009) for Saudi, UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait. I will let you know if / when i will have an official alert and more details on that subject.
By the way, You wrote that, you know that there was talk about abolishing V.O.A for citizens of Gulf countries. From where did you hear that? Does the EU wants Turkey to do so? Thanks. With my best regards.. --Ozguroot (talk) 00:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Yenibiyometrikpasaportlar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Yenibiyometrikpasaportlar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 18:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello Ozguroot, I wanted to change the picture of countries which have biometric passports, but I couldn't, so if you can I would really appreciate it. Since 15 October Bosnia and Herzegovina started issuing biometric passports, if you could mark it on a map, it would be cool. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by FaceOffic (talk • contribs) 17:43, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:Map of countries with biometric passports 2.svg
File:Map of countries with biometric passports 2.svg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:TESTMap of countries with biometric passports 2.svg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:TESTMap of countries with biometric passports 2.svg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:33, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Yenibiyometrikpasaportlar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Yenibiyometrikpasaportlar.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ► 08:18, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
PlayStation edits
Hi there.
Could you explain your reversions - at least quantify them on the discussion page as I've asked. The removal wasn't unneccesary, because as it currently stands the reinstated sentence is unclear. Which "original" Playstation does the sentence refer to? A specific model (such as the SCPH-1000), a country release, (US/EURO/JP?) or merely the original grey box Playstation? As stated, my 1002 - the original European release - has the grey slabbed music background, ergo the sentence is inaccurate in at least one logical interpretation. a_man_alone (talk) 22:47, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello.
I think there's been a misunderstanding, or I haven't been clear enough.
Original PlayStation = SCPH-1000 = JP
--Ozguroot (talk) 23:08, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Removal of 'visa free travel' block from all national Passport articles
Following notification at CENT and subsequent discussion at Talk:Passport, a clear consensus has emerged for the removal of these sections from the articles concerned. Please do not unilaterally re-apply them Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 22:37, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
You are just wasting your time, because A LOT OF people will undo them. And again because; People like those details. People want those details when they check "X Passport". People look for those details. They're useful information for their articles. What would you put there, otherwise? List of famous pop singers?! Or maybe people visit their passports articles to see some photos and the colour of the passports? Not funny. --Ozguroot (talk) 22:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
January 2010
Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. See: [3] [4]. —what a crazy random happenstance 03:57, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
There is nothing wrong. I do respect Wikipedia's principles that's why i reported your "decide" to them so they'll check it out. They may think opposite, right? They are moderators & editor of the article in subject. I wanted to let them know about that "craziness". --Ozguroot (talk) 10:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
- Please do not revert against 'consensus' as you did at Turkish passport. Your opposition to the removal of these sections is duly noted at Talk:Passport. Thank you. RashersTierney (talk) 14:51, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your comments. Please note that on Wikipedia, consensus is determined by discussion, not voting, and it is the quality of arguments that counts, not the number of people supporting a position. Consider reading about the deletion policy for a brief overview for the deletion process, and how we decide what to keep and what to delete. We hope you decide to stay and contribute even more. Thank you! Mass reverting of consensus edits is unlikely to result in a new consensus and may be considered disruptive. Please re-consider your behavior on passport-related articles. RashersTierney (talk) 17:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Stop
Stop edit warring and return to discussion please. Have you read what has been raised at Talk:Passport? Consensus need not be unanimous. —what a crazy random happenstance 01:36, 26 January 2010 (UTC)