Orderinchaos (talk | contribs) |
→ANI notice: new section |
||
Line 279: | Line 279: | ||
Your G4 deletion of this was correct, but I've undeleted it and protected it as a redirect, since a merge was performed and the history needs to be preserved. The history can be moved elsewhere, of course, as long as it's somewhere. Just wanted to make sure my intentions here were clear. Cheers, [[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]] 23:53, 15 November 2009 (UTC) |
Your G4 deletion of this was correct, but I've undeleted it and protected it as a redirect, since a merge was performed and the history needs to be preserved. The history can be moved elsewhere, of course, as long as it's somewhere. Just wanted to make sure my intentions here were clear. Cheers, [[User:Chick Bowen|Chick Bowen]] 23:53, 15 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
== ANI notice == |
|||
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:|The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#|{{{thread}}}]]. }}{{#if:|The discussion is about the topic [[:{{{1}}}]].}} <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 04:17, 18 November 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:18, 18 November 2009
User Page | Userboxes | Barnstars | Projects | Talk Page |
Owing in part to various personal circumstances including a ridiculous stack of overdue deadlines in my studies, I may not be contactable for periods on here - if something urgent comes up use "E-mail this user" to notify me. Thanks. Orderinchaos 00:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
note to selfGayfer - Switched house Lewis - Switched house Lapham- Retired Lewis - Retired Manning 1 - Retired Manning 2 - Retired Nalder - Retired Norton - Retired Runciman - Retired Sewell - Retired Bickerton - Defeated Brown - Defeated Cook - Defeated Young - Defeated Orderinchaos 05:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC) my wathlistskiAn edit on my watchlists -Beer and breweries in Poland was right next to your talk page edit - how appropriate! The bloody hungarian firefox and this dammned keyboard will probably kill my polish category tagging for the mo - we most likely gonna get snow tommorrow-that will sort out whther my scottish cold weather gear works(or not) - cheerski! SatuSuro 13:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
No I got it wrong we just get freezing rain -its poland and above who get the snow :)well it does depend whether you believe the weather reports on the web ? SatuSuro 17:17, 14 October 2009 (UTC) Solved the hungarian keyboard issue-tagging while the wind howls at the door SatuSuro 17:32, 14 October 2009 (UTC) Oops! I should have known that! I have an A level in geography! HJMitchell You rang? 17:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC) I consider that the issue needs further clarification in at least the cocos article but with at least a ref - they were (if not still) a demographic fact not a cia fact :( SatuSuro 17:54, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
In that case the christmas needs the chop and any susbtantive information available can surely lump the two together (ie other than the fact/no fact book)SatuSuro 18:08, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
about to ctch trainwaiting for trnsfer vehicle- f i get off qick you will understand what do you think about innate speciesist nature of article and category? will try to check for answer in veinna butcannotpromise SatuSuro 09:09, 16 October 2009 (UTC) SALCI don't quite know where it belongs now. It's not worth the 'next' election page as it has nothing to do with it now and it's too specific for Rann's page. Perhaps the South Australian Legislative Council? Timeshift (talk) 04:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC) Re: Aussie questionHi, regarding this, I was looking for the viewing figures for the Going to Australia episode of Cold Feet. It was originally broadcast in Aus on Seven on 6 June 2002. Just having the total viewing figure, rather than the city breakdowns, would be fine. Bradley0110 (talk) 21:14, 16 October 2009 (UTC) Various John DuggansThanks for hint. I was looking at the naming conventions pages trying to work out whether it was better to use John Duggan (politician) or John Duggan (australian politician), and how to deal with the manifold bad links that I saw for the John Duggan entry when i saw that you'd already done it. Very quick. Machina.sapiens 11:16, 18 October 2009 (UTC) thank youThanks for handling the editprotecteds on Template:Coord. --Stepheng3 (talk) 16:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thank youFor your kind words at the arbcom pages. I just want to clarify a technicality: my adminship was temporarily suspended, and later I indicated I am willing to resign voluntarily if the committee and/or the community request that. As such request has not been made yet, I have not yet technically resign - although the offer is still on the table if the committee and community want to take me up on it (I've been for years an admin open to recall and I consider my offer simply a part of that process - admins should have the trust of the community behind them, and if they don't have the trust, they should resign or be recalled until such a time they can reestablish this trust). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:05, 19 October 2009 (UTC) Hi. I've replied here: Talk:Peter_Hollingworth - Richard Cavell (talk) 21:13, 19 October 2009 (UTC) RFA spam
night trin throughtransylvaniait ok beeble and iaresweet - will explain one dayit doesntranslateto keyboarverywell asforthe rumanianand bulgrianbit- will give you a hoot bssunday or so about it as for keyboards - finnish, russin, polish, czchand hungrin-gimme mykidspconeanytime cheers(thesrt is to find althe alt gr ke-the thirdlevel) SatuSuro 06:32, 21 October 2009 (UTC) On the GG"in fact, to be precise, his commission was revoked by the Queen personally" - that's somewhat hyperbolic, if not inaccurate. She appoints GGs and, where necessary, revokes their commissions and accepts their resignations. She's the only one who can do the latter things. I doubt she has any real power to refuse a resignation. A GG who did not want to serve would be worse than useless if forced to stay on, but I've never heard of a vice-regal resignation being refused. -- JackofOz (talk) 09:08, 21 October 2009 (UTC) Prvi zdrug"Muka mi je više od propagande svih boja!!" ..means basically "I hate any form (color) of propaganda" Besides: I agree with his changes in Za dom spremni, especially the citation needed. Goran777 (talk) 11:58, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello Orderinchaos Lets start with: 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partizani As wit any encyclopedia Wiki should me objective i shouldn't be a e-book of glorification. My input in that article was about known and validated war crimes don by Yugoslavia Partisans 2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Za_dom_spremni Was aiding explanation to translation witch is literal and dos not show thwe meaning in English language Original was: * literally transl. from Croatian: For home - ready! I added the part:
3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SR_Croatia I changed the language from Serbo-Croatian to Croato-Serbian The official language of SR Croatia was Croato-Serbian as it is shown in dictionaries that I submitted in the post! ![]() ![]() And what happened you bann my account all the changes I explained in talk sections and DIRECTOR just deleted them!Prvi zdrug uskrsnuce (talk) 18:26, 21 October 2009 (UTC) Disruptive editsThe user has continued his edit warring [1] [2] [3]. No surprises there... Goran should note that he was not the one that added {{citation needed}}, but User:LAz17 (Serbian wikipedian) [4]. All his edits, besides being totally POV, are in blatant violation of WP:LEAD. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 12:24, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Now he's damaging the Operation Storm article... Following the "pilgrim's route", it would seem. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 14:55, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your time. Now I'm busy with another one... You've met a "Croatian nationalist", now you can get acquainted with a typical "Yugoslav fanatic". User:Barlo7 has been constantly removing valid predecessor states from the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia article infobox. Calling me a "fascist" [5] and claiming that to even mention Nazi Germany in there is somehow "insulting to the dead" [6]... I tried to explain everything to him [7], as usual to no avail... It never ends. xP --DIREKTOR (TALK) 18:09, 21 October 2009 (UTC) For each change I submitted explanation and even proof in pictures (the croato-serbian language) But nooo you just band my account. If you want to be objective keep wiki objective pleas read the input before you ban people. I know that DIRECTOR is here longer than me but that doesn’t mean that he is objective. The guy loves Yugoslavia and that is ok with me, but that shouldn’t be reason to turn Wikipedia into his own private myth-book. As example he didn’t like when I did put the information about Partisian War crimes on "believe it or not" Partisan page!? Prvi zdrug uskrsnuce (talk) 18:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Kangaroo attacks in AustraliaYou might want to take a look at all the other "x attacks in Australia" articles in the template too. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:53, 25 October 2009 (UTC) Oi!Come on MSN when you get the chance - I want to gossip about some state political dramas :D Rebecca (talk) 13:39, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Infobox Australian placeI'm just curious as to what this edit was about. --AussieLegend (talk) 17:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Sydney suburbs projectG'Day Orderinchaos, I noticed you made some changes to the Putney article today and didn't like my reverts. I have been working on the Sydney suburbs articles for the past four years and we have been trying to keep all the articles standardised. First of all, the road distances I have used have been from the reference material, "The Book of Sydney Suburbs". The book is a bit old now, so I concede its quite possible that with new roads built, there are shorter routes to some suburbs now. I checked with the Street Directory and it could be between 12 and 15 kms depending on what route you took. Fair enough. 12km it is then. As for the intro to the article we have been endeavouring to create some sort of template for all article on Sydney suburbs. We're trying to keep a standard so that you have all the same information presented the same way in every article so its easy to do comparisons. It generally follows this standard: XXXXXXX is a suburb in Sydney, in the state of New South Wales, Australia. XXXXXXX is located xx kilometres south of the Sydney central business district, in the local government area of the City of Rockdale and is part of the St George. (the last part being the Sydney region) This is followed by extra location information such as important landmarks. XXXXXX is located on the northern bank of the Parramatta River. We have been trying to use thsi standard on every article across Sydney. It's not perefect or completely adopted across the board yet, I admit, because we did have another standard originally. We were originally using the 'region' as part of the first sentence (eg southern sydney, eastern suburbs, north shore) so some articles follow the old standard, such as Banksia below which is part of Southern Sydney (souther) and also the St George area. Banksia is a suburb in southern Sydney, in the state of New South Wales, Australia. Banksia is located 12 kilometres south of the Sydney central business district, in the local government area of the City of Rockdale and is part of the St George area. My concern with your intro to Putney is that it doesn't follow the conventions we have been trying to use across the board. If we start using different ones for different articles then we will lose the standard we are trying to achieve. A lot of these standards have been selected because they improve the hit rate for Google and other search engines. It might seem weird to repeat the suburb name in the second sentence for instance but it guarantees more hits with Google when you do that. I hope you can see what we are trying to achieve with these standards and why I am trying to keep Putney the same as other articles about Sydney suburbs. If you have some suggestions for improving the articles that's great but keep in mind that it would have to be adopted across hundreds of Sydney articles to make it standard. Cheers. J Bar (talk) 07:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshopAs you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome. terminologythe current banners are enough to make me want to retire on the spot. you - if you are on much might want to have a second thought about the legal status of the nullarbor location viz my rollback - where and how this edit is made i dont give a rats if i am in turn reverted - but calling a roadhouse a town without a cite to me is suspect SatuSuro 07:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Name blockYour blocking of Corruption makes sense. Otherwise, there could be names like Lawyersarecrooked, Carsalesmencheat, ThePrimeMinisterTakesCashPayments Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 00:45, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
CDPHopefully this stupid stunt bites the tools in the bum... so many candidates will dilute any individual vote. I hope they come 14-22. Timeshift (talk) 02:46, 14 November 2009 (UTC) KangarooHi, the article was much larger than when it was originally nominated and when it was deleted. G4 says "sufficiently identical and unimproved copy" which is not the case - it was twice as large as the one deleted. James4750 (talk) 03:07, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
What was the meaning of this edit? You can clearly see that a number of unsourced additions had been which had to be removed alongwith the unreliable links like ladygaga.shop as well and returning information to WP:LEAD. So would you care to explain it? --Legolas (talk2me) 16:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
(Outdent)There was no reason for that warning, when we are clearly discussing it in YOUR talk page. A huge block of unsourced statement, "Telephone" as the single and removal of summary from lead was introduced in the article. Please I request you again, don't do anything as me and Grk1011 are discussing things. --Legolas (talk2me) 16:35, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Hope no one minds, but for convenience I've linked the topic title to the article for quick reference. I also am interested in how this turns out as I'm also heavily involved in the current editing process and talk page discussion; Orderinchaos, if I'm out of hand with any of my edits, please let me know. CycloneGU (talk) 17:32, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
RE: ApologiesHi, yeah, on The Fame Monster article, I kinda actually reverted changes that I did not intend on reverting without realising, that were made by other people. This was a result of edit conflicts. So, we're kinda both to blame. No worries. :P --Kei_Jo (Talk to me baby! :þ) —Preceding undated comment added 19:16, 15 November 2009 (UTC). Your G4 deletion of this was correct, but I've undeleted it and protected it as a redirect, since a merge was performed and the history needs to be preserved. The history can be moved elsewhere, of course, as long as it's somewhere. Just wanted to make sure my intentions here were clear. Cheers, Chick Bowen 23:53, 15 November 2009 (UTC) ANI noticeHello, Orderinchaos. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 04:17, 18 November 2009 (UTC) |