Content deleted Content added
2600:1702:10b0:6060:9452:8034:a671:dd6d (talk) Tag: Reverted |
rev utter moron Tag: Undo |
||
Line 852: | Line 852: | ||
:Learn the rules. Nothing on their pages links them to the Woodlands. You're about to be blocked from editing. Desist. And don't post on my talk page again, unless it's an apology. [[User:onel5969|'''<span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#ffb300;">5969</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 01:35, 19 December 2020 (UTC) |
:Learn the rules. Nothing on their pages links them to the Woodlands. You're about to be blocked from editing. Desist. And don't post on my talk page again, unless it's an apology. [[User:onel5969|'''<span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#ffb300;">5969</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Onel5969|<i style="color:blue">TT me</i>]]</sup> 01:35, 19 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Bystander Here.... == |
|||
Are you really trying to use circular reasoning to validate your point? I don't use Wikipedia that much, but this is something else. "Nothing on their Wikipedia pages says anything about them living in The Woodlands." Uh, what? That's why the other guy was trying to add it to the page. Going back to what classifies as a valid source, shouldn't an anecdotal be acceptable? That is as close to as a reliable source as you can get. |
|||
18 December, 2020 |
|||
Don't have an account, so I am just using my IP. |