ArchivedArchived talkpage! oncamera(t) 00:34, 12 September 2010 (UTC) BHHey! It's User:Cristabel0 again. Thoughts on User:Aquegg... should just report him? I have put up a edit warring notice on his talk page, deletes it... then he continues on at Bohemian Rhapsody. Just wanna know your thoughts on this? Thanks :) Cristabel0 (talk) 11:17, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
JYJI created a sub page where I can bring JYJ to met WP:N. Could you provide me with sources that led to formation? I can do the rest with the recent developments. TBH, I've fallen out of the TVXQ fandom so I don't know much about JYJ, expect for what has happened recently. 夢追人YumeChaser 01:21, 29 September 2010 (UTC) YumeChaserYou know, I wouldn't have done what I did if YumeChaser did not do this so I could not move the page back after he moved it in the first place. The page was at the name "Journey through the Decade" for over a year. And the moment it gets moved back to that title after I discovered it was moved because the manuals of style apparently enforce that the word "through" is supposed to be capitalized, he has to move it back? This shit is all he does. He does not add content. He only renames things. There is no way that I can amicably converse with him because in order to get a point across, I have to work to modify the damn MOS that he's enforcing for him to change his opinion.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Speed skating infoboxesI have added my comments. Cheers, Krazytea (talk) 03:57, 4 November 2010 (UTC) DakotaHi. If you can translate this line into Dakota, I will try to make a user box for you:
2011 World Short TrackPlease leave the formatting as it is thank you. Also there is no overall medal awarded so it should not be in medal table. Intoronto1125 (talk) 03:27, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Infobox speed skaterThere is a misunderstanding. No parameter name changed. The template remains unchanged. Same the visual result. No extra changes are needed! This is the result of a parameter strandardisation we performed with success in most of the infoboxes. -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:36, 10 May 2011 (UTC) Getting Wikimedians to the Olympic GamesHi. I am part of an effort to get Wikimedians access to the 2016 Summer Olympics as accredited reporters and photographers. Part of this effort includes covering the 2012 Summer Paralympics. Two Wikimedians have credentials to attend these games as reporters through Wikimedia Australia. As English Wikipedia does not allow original reporting, this is largely through Wikinews with a project page found at Wikinews:Paralympic Games. If you are interested in helping to get Wikimedians to the next Summer Olympics,I'd encourage you to assist with Wikinews efforts, and also to work on all language 2012 Summer Paralympic Wikipedia articles before, during and after the Games to demonstrate a track record of success. Thank you. --LauraHale (talk) 04:26, 17 August 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 4Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American bison, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White Buffalo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC) Tennis article discussionBecause you and others were instrumental in forming our current tennis guidelines on seasonal articles for special players, I though you might be interested in the re-visit being discussed at talk:projectTennis. Currently, because of input from that 2011 discussion, any singles player skilled enough to win a grand slam tournament is allowed continuous seasonal articles. No grand slam tournament win, no season article. A grand slam tournament win in 2012 allows seasonal articles in 2013 and 2014 whether or not more grand slam tournaments were won. I was against these articles, but even I have to admit it has worked reasonably well and there really haven't been all that many articles made. A recent deletion of the 2013 Maria Sharapova tennis season has brought this to the forefront once again and we at Tennis Project are trying to decide if we leave things as they are or narrow the parameters in several different ways. We could use more input (whether your views have changed or not). I gave the old discussion link so you can see your original thoughts, but all those who gave their view before are being invited to discuss. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC) PreciousSpirit Lake Thank you for quality articles beginning with Spirit Lake Tribe, for a watchful eye on Native Americans in the United States, for unstubbing Simon Cho, and redirects for speed skating and Mozart concertos, - French-speaking flute-player, you are an awesome Wikipedian! A year ago, you were recipient no. 1517 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:55, 24 November 2017 (UTC) Two years now ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Oncamera. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Rami Malek
January 2019Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:40, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you!Sorry for my sloppy contribution, this is my first time editing; I'm a Canadian university student who did a project on Sherman's work and on other academic works that drew from or built upon his own, and I was just hoping to add a little more exposure to the whole thing by linking up the pages. I didn't add any new pages or any information I couldn't source, (if need be,) so thank you for bearing with me and fixing up my mistakes! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.13.29.92 (talk) 22:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Lucy BoyntonHi, just want to say thank you for your edit on Lucy Boynton. You made it look much better haha. Thanks again :) Cristabel0 (talk) 03:36, 15 January 2019 (UTC) Johnny DeppPlease make him famous all over the internet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnydepp11 (talk • contribs) 12:32, 6 February 2019 (UTC) Thank you... and could you just write the Debussy article? I would but am busy, - today Michael Gielen. Nice to meet you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:39, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Suggestion for Trois Chansons (Debussy)Hello! I recently reviewed your article on Debussy's Trois Chansons. First, in the "Texts and music" section, it would probably be good to mention the key the songs are in. Second, if you are looking to expand the article, I found this thesis that might help you. Thanks! RileyBugz私に叫ぼう私の編集 20:35, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Edit warringBeing involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jonathunder (talk) 20:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
|