Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retired}} |
{{retired}} |
||
Deleting well referenced material as copyright violations is absolutely appalling.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/20101001#Instructions] Some of these "violations" are no more than one sentence! |
|||
This fanaticism by these |
This fanaticism by these "self-appointed [copyright] guardians"[http://www.economist.com/printedition/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10789354], makes any prolific editor a target. As I never want to write another article sentence again I am retiring. |
Revision as of 19:03, 10 November 2010
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.
Deleting well referenced material as copyright violations is absolutely appalling.[1] Some of these "violations" are no more than one sentence!
This fanaticism by these "self-appointed [copyright] guardians"[2], makes any prolific editor a target. As I never want to write another article sentence again I am retiring.