Content deleted Content added
Astral Leap (talk | contribs) →Can you take a look?: new section |
|||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
I examined GizzyCatBella's last 500-1000 edits. I placed what I found in [[User:Astral Leap/sandbox]]. Do you think this should be submitted? And if it is, what board should it be reported on?--[[User:Astral Leap|Astral Leap]] ([[User talk:Astral Leap|talk]]) 09:44, 28 November 2020 (UTC) |
I examined GizzyCatBella's last 500-1000 edits. I placed what I found in [[User:Astral Leap/sandbox]]. Do you think this should be submitted? And if it is, what board should it be reported on?--[[User:Astral Leap|Astral Leap]] ([[User talk:Astral Leap|talk]]) 09:44, 28 November 2020 (UTC) |
||
:Hmm. I must admit that my knowledge of Polish history is extremely limited, so my opinion here is not going to be particularly well informed. My initial impression is that most of the diffs that you cite probably would not be viewed at AE as direct violation of the topic ban although they certainly skirt close. To my eye, the two possible exceptions are the prison [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bereza_Kartuska_Prison&diff=prev&oldid=990782949] and the Potsdam Conference[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Potsdam_Conference&diff=prev&oldid=980392395] where I think a convincing case could be made that the articles in question do fall within the topic ban. As you say, the future of Poland was a major topic at the Potsdam conference and the post-WWII arrangements between the allies regarding Poland were essentially finalized there. The article [[Bereza Kartuska Prison]] mentions WWII events in the lede and in the history section, and the history section discusses that some Poles suspected of pro-German symathies were incarcerated there right before the war. The article doesn't say anything about the Jews being imprisoned there, so you'd have to explain that in any AE filing. You could try filing an AE report about a topic ban vilation, say based on these two edits. I am not sure what would happen there, as I don't have any prior experience with filing AE reports myself. Possibly worth a try. [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] ([[User talk:Nsk92#top|talk]]) 10:28, 28 November 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:28, 28 November 2020
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Disambiguation link notification for November 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hamdi Zurqani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mapping.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Can you take a look?
I examined GizzyCatBella's last 500-1000 edits. I placed what I found in User:Astral Leap/sandbox. Do you think this should be submitted? And if it is, what board should it be reported on?--Astral Leap (talk) 09:44, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm. I must admit that my knowledge of Polish history is extremely limited, so my opinion here is not going to be particularly well informed. My initial impression is that most of the diffs that you cite probably would not be viewed at AE as direct violation of the topic ban although they certainly skirt close. To my eye, the two possible exceptions are the prison [1] and the Potsdam Conference[2] where I think a convincing case could be made that the articles in question do fall within the topic ban. As you say, the future of Poland was a major topic at the Potsdam conference and the post-WWII arrangements between the allies regarding Poland were essentially finalized there. The article Bereza Kartuska Prison mentions WWII events in the lede and in the history section, and the history section discusses that some Poles suspected of pro-German symathies were incarcerated there right before the war. The article doesn't say anything about the Jews being imprisoned there, so you'd have to explain that in any AE filing. You could try filing an AE report about a topic ban vilation, say based on these two edits. I am not sure what would happen there, as I don't have any prior experience with filing AE reports myself. Possibly worth a try. Nsk92 (talk) 10:28, 28 November 2020 (UTC)