Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
:Huh? Look [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Sir_james_paul here]. You were blocked twice for 3RR violations on Evolution in March. Perhaps you didn't notice, but it happened. [[User:Not a dog|Not a dog]] 11:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC) |
:Huh? Look [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Sir_james_paul here]. You were blocked twice for 3RR violations on Evolution in March. Perhaps you didn't notice, but it happened. [[User:Not a dog|Not a dog]] 11:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
::And you openly acknolwedge and discuss/dispute your previous blocks [[User_talk:Sir_james_paul/page_6#Blocked|here]] and [[User_talk:Sir_james_paul/page_6#Blocked|here]]. Perhaps that will shake your memory. [[User:Not a dog|Not a dog]] 12:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC) |
::And you openly acknolwedge and discuss/dispute your previous blocks [[User_talk:Sir_james_paul/page_6#Blocked|here]] and [[User_talk:Sir_james_paul/page_6#Blocked|here]]. Perhaps that will shake your memory. [[User:Not a dog|Not a dog]] 12:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
:I thought you were saying I was just blocked. |
|||
:I agree with you that I was blocked 2 times for 3RR in March on the Evolution article, but just because I had 2 edits on the article in a 24 hour period in June, does not mean I have broken policy. You have no case against me sir that will get me blocked again. Have a nice week.--[[User:Sir james paul|James, La gloria è a dio]] 23:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:51, 30 May 2007
Annika Sorestam and Charlotta Sorenstam fair use images
Hi, You contacted me because you disputed that the images used on Annika Sorenstam and Charlotta Sorenstam. Please understand that we have previously settled this dispute on Wikipedia with regard to the use of images provided by LPGA.com of their players and it has been established that these fall under the definition of fair use because their are provided as promotional materials to promote their players. These images are provided now for almost all of the LPGA players in their articles. I understand that you are new to Wikipedia and were probably not aware of this. Thanks for understanding. --Crunch 21:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please point me to that discussion and policy decision. thanks. Not a dog 21:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Sorry I can't find all the exact discussions. I'll make an attempt to find the admin (which obviously you are not) who worked on the dispute. In the meantime, perhaps you can contact lpga.com and ask them if they object to the approximately 100+ images we've been using on this site for the past two years. They don't. You've been here for about two weeks and are running roughshod through a lot of articles and making a whole lot of enemies in short order. What's your intent? --Crunch 22:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- First, I've been here since August 2006, so spare me your "you're just a newbie" rhetoric. Second, the best practice for fair use is to defer to free images when possible. The very tag you used states, in part: "Please note that our policy usually considers fair use images of living people that merely show what they look like to be replaceable by free-licensed images and unsuitable for the project. If this is not the case for this image, a rationale should be provided proving that the image provides information beyond simple identification or showing that this image is difficult to replace by a free-licensed equivalent." Since these are living people who regularly and predictably engage in public activities, free images are readily available. I have no "intent" other than ensuring free use of Wikipedia's content.Not a dog 22:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
August 2006? That's not very long ago. In any case, you just started editing with this name and have quickly come under attack for not understanding policy. Anyway these people do NOT engage in public activities with free images and free images are NOT readily available. The LPGA prohibits use of photography at tournaments by all but their strictly regulated media at tournaments. For this reason, they provide these images. The correct rationale is nonfree promotional --Crunch 12:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- QUit trying to pull some "i've been here longer than you" rank bullshit with me. You were wrong when you stated "You've been here for about two weeks" and you're wrong again when you state "you just started editing with this name". Not a dog 13:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and guess what - these players also appear in non-LPGA events (charity events??) where cameras are allowed. They appear at clinics, openings, etc. Cameras also are commonly allowed during practice rounds and pro-ams, such as noted with this weekend's very tournament. Your fair use argument that free images aren't available simply is not accurate. Not a dog 13:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
The copy of the email from Denis Mojado specified clearly that he released his photos, that I had already uploaded, under the by-2.0 CC license. Only for future uploads he required the by-nd-2.0 license (see the talk page of the image). There were no future uploads, since this license was incompatible with Wikipedia. (bolding by me). Therefore I ask you to reconsider this speedy deletion request. JoJan 18:46, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- Apologies for missing that email on the talk page - went too quickly through that one. However, I urge you to follow the procedures at WP:ERP: post the details of the permission granted at Wikipedia:Successful requests for permission. You should also send a copy of your request and the response to "permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org" where it will be permanently archived. Not a dog 18:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
References
I know those kind of references aren't the best ones, but they are the ones that have been used. The text on those year articles is a summary of text on other articles from having checked the "What links here" section for each page. So "Wikipedia articles that link to this article." is actually a very accurate description of where the information has been found. /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 22:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but that makes absolutely no sense. Is this in the manual of style or somewhere else in policy? Not a dog 22:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- What makes no sense? If you go to 226 BC and click "What links here", you'll find the list of references. The information in those articles is what the info in the year article is based on. /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 14:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- That is circular logic. You're stating that "these facts happended in year XX because all these articles say they do". Not a dog 15:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- What makes no sense? If you go to 226 BC and click "What links here", you'll find the list of references. The information in those articles is what the info in the year article is based on. /Ludde23 Talk Contrib 14:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Stalking
Please would you stop wikistalking my images and article, thankyou. ≈ Maurauth (nemesis) 13:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- It is not stalking - please calm down. It is common (and helpful for the project) that if a common error is found by a editor, to double-check other contributions by that editor to ensure the same mistake isn't made twice. Secondly, I also frequently monitor the list of images with fair use and cc-2.0 claims to check for errors, and that's how I came upon some of them in the first place. Worry about the policies, not whether you feel I'm stalking you. Not a dog 15:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Comment
Please don't say I was blocked when I was not. Thanks.--James, La gloria è a dio 11:43, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- Huh? Look here. You were blocked twice for 3RR violations on Evolution in March. Perhaps you didn't notice, but it happened. Not a dog 11:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- I thought you were saying I was just blocked.
- I agree with you that I was blocked 2 times for 3RR in March on the Evolution article, but just because I had 2 edits on the article in a 24 hour period in June, does not mean I have broken policy. You have no case against me sir that will get me blocked again. Have a nice week.--James, La gloria è a dio 23:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)