Denisarona (talk | contribs) →Barbara Hewson: new section |
Northamerica1000 (talk | contribs) →Barbara Hewson: re |
||
Line 520: | Line 520: | ||
Hi, can you check out edits to the above, I don't want to be in violation of 3RR. Thanks [[User:Denisarona|Denisarona]] ([[User talk:Denisarona|talk]]) 07:19, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
Hi, can you check out edits to the above, I don't want to be in violation of 3RR. Thanks [[User:Denisarona|Denisarona]] ([[User talk:Denisarona|talk]]) 07:19, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|Denisarona}} It appears that you are reverting vandalism in the form of the blanking of content. As per [[WP:EDITWAR]], "There are certain exemptions to 3RR, such as reverting vandalism or clear violations of the Biographies of living persons policy". <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 07:26, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:26, 3 July 2015
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130 Threads older than 20 days are typically archived. Some may be archived sooner.
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Per Holknekt
Take a look at the article Per Holknekt that I have created. Appreciate it.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:18, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- @BabbaQ: The article seems to be in order. Thanks for creating the new article. North America1000 08:26, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
I started a discussion at Template talk:Aviation lists#Misc. as well as General? I thought you might be interested as you made this edit. Regards, – Wdchk (talk) 02:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Wdchk: Thanks for the notification. North America1000 03:54, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sandbox
Looks like Odisea, a Spanish version of the Odyssey, I think. I don't know if this affects revisions or anything, so I thought I'd post this. Dustin (talk) 03:53, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I reverted the edit because the content could potentially be a copyvio. North America1000 03:54, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I think it was a copyvio, but it's been removed so I hope I haven't pointlessly bothered you about it. Dustin (talk) 03:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Dustin V. S.: Without proof of copyvio, I hesitate to revdelete the content. North America1000 04:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I copied a section of the text the IP added and it provided a match with text contained in a book known as Odisea. This is one example. I'm still getting Odisea to come up with random excerpts from way near the center of the IP's text block here. Dustin (talk) 04:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC) Dustin (talk) 04:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Dustin V. S.: With a little more qualification, I'd be willing to revdelete the version. North America1000 04:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Even this is giving me results (it doesn't seem to highlight the specific words, but the copied text is there, but two pages before the page the link actually starts me out on). Dustin (talk) 04:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- My searches are also providing evidence of copyright violation:
- As such, I have deleted three revisions of the page (see Revision history). North America1000 04:25, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Okay; I appreciate your haste in responding! Dustin (talk) 04:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Dustin V. S.: I have deleted additional revisions of the page as copyright violations after performing more research. I have not deleted this version, because it appears to be from a Spanish version of the Bible. Check out Bible translations into Spanish for more information. North America1000 04:38, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Okay; I appreciate your haste in responding! Dustin (talk) 04:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Even this is giving me results (it doesn't seem to highlight the specific words, but the copied text is there, but two pages before the page the link actually starts me out on). Dustin (talk) 04:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Dustin V. S.: With a little more qualification, I'd be willing to revdelete the version. North America1000 04:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I copied a section of the text the IP added and it provided a match with text contained in a book known as Odisea. This is one example. I'm still getting Odisea to come up with random excerpts from way near the center of the IP's text block here. Dustin (talk) 04:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC) Dustin (talk) 04:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Dustin V. S.: Without proof of copyvio, I hesitate to revdelete the content. North America1000 04:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I think it was a copyvio, but it's been removed so I hope I haven't pointlessly bothered you about it. Dustin (talk) 03:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
90.33.167.222
Hi NA, saw your recent block notice on the talk page of IP 90.33.167.222 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). They've returned with edits like this one where they remove character descriptions from the cast list with no explanation. Also unexplained removal of wikilinks, etc. This is very similar to an edit they made prior to their block. I also noticed the unsourced addition of birthdate info for Regan Mizrahi (a minor for whom WP:BLPPRIVACY would likely be very important.) Here they remove a df=y switch for a subject who is clearly British. If you notice Tefkasp's edit on the left, it appears the same bogus change was also made by IP 92.148.123.161. Both IPs geolocate to France (ISP: Orange). Could be Maelbros, although I don't see the typical infobox parameter vandalism here. Anyhow, if you need anything, ping me or somethin'. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:59, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Cyphoidbomb: Thanks for the notification. North America1000 18:45, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Just curious!
Hello Northamerica1000! First off, Kudos on doing great job in AfDs. Your work is widely noted! Just wanted to ask you something out of curiosity. Not to stop you or anything, just a curiosity. Came across this line Users who have previously voted in a discussion should not relist it, and users who have relisted a debate should not subsequently vote in it. in WP:RELIST, and you just breached the line in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaya Supermarket, didn't you? Or am I getting something wrong? Either way maybe.. Just wanted to clarify my doubt. Cheers! --JAaron95 (Talk) 14:09, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Jaaron95: This was recently added (diff), but there was no consensus formed for this new rule to be created. As such, I have removed the content from the page (diff). North America1000 21:28, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Mustafizur Rahman (general) is copied
@ Northamerica1000, the article Mustafizur Rahman (general) is a copied version of Pervez Musharraf.Farzana zardari (talk) 11:34, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
wrong informations
@ Northamerica1000, please read carefully that Mustafizur Rahman (general) is full of wrong informations. The article is also copied from Yahya Khan.Farzana zardari (talk) 11:45, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks
dear Northamerica1000, thank you so much for totally removing wrong information from Mustafizur Rahman (general).Farzana zardari (talk) 11:48, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Farzana zardari: After more research, I have proposed this for speedy deletion as a WP:HOAX. None of the sources are about the purported subject (who appears to not actually exist as stated in the article), and source searches are not verifying any content at this time.
Rather than deleting it myself, I have blanked the page and proposed it for deletion to receive eyes from another admin regarding the matter.North America1000 11:49, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Farzana zardari:: I had written most of my reply above prior to your additional posts and then copied it above. I initially wanted to get a second opinion/seconding of the deletion, just to be cautious. Thanks for providing the additional information, and yes, the remaining content was copied from Yahya Khan. As such, I have deleted the article per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion WP:G3 as a blatant hoax. Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention. North America1000 12:09, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
I am grateful to you
@ Northamerica1000, I am grateful to you for deleting the page. Thanks again.Farzana zardari (talk) 04:12, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Editing in Bhumihar
Hi NorthAmerica
I had just found several wrong illusion in the content Bhumihar. Regarding the presence of Bhumihars, certainly, there woyld be few in each countries. But we are talking about mass level population. Recently, at a meeting of historians in Patna, the same topic had came. And apart from few historians belonging to Bhumihar caste, who had no substantial proof,all were agreeable that the people brought to Mauritius, Fiji, Guyana were labors and belonging from poor caste. Certainly Bhumihar being landed, would not have been brought to those land. It is only in recent years that false glorification of their fellow caste are being done by everyone, and so by Bhumihars.
Similarly, Mr Naipaul has said publicly that he has no idea about his roots. his grandparents emigrated from India to work as indentured servants in Trinidad's sugar plantations. So certainly nothing is known about his caste. And certainly, Naipaul surname is not used by Bhumihars.
Most probably, it seems you belong from Bhumihar caste, so you got offended by my editing. There is nothing wrong in glorification of ones caste (although we should have left this caste identity in sake of nation), but it should be genuine and correct. Why put something without any proof.If you want, then there are other people from the caste whose name can be put in the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajkishore.iim (talk • contribs) 12:46, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hello @Rajkishore.iim: The problem was that you removed content from the article (Bhumihar) that is cited to a reliable source. Wikipedia content is written based upon what reliable sources report. I have no bias in this matter, but the rules need to be followed. Furthermore, when you performed the edits, you did not provide edit summaries explaining your changes. A good way to resolve these types of matters is to initiate a discussion on the article's talk page. North America1000 13:46, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Needs Employment in your company
Gud day,my name is sahadat lawal, am a Nigeria,am 21yrs old,i finish my diploma in agricultural _engineering. The reason why am sending this email is because I need a job in your company before I can proceed with the work permit visa. Pls I will like to hear from u soon. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.112.8.114 (talk) 13:42, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hello there: I'm not an employer, just another Wikipedia contributor. If you're interested in positions with the Wikimedia Foundation, check out their website at wikimediafoundation
.org /wiki /Home. North America1000 13:48, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Adminship
You're welcome, you're welcome, and thank you, both for your lovely words at RfD and for your congratulations. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:35, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Ser Amantio di Nicolao: Thanks again for your contributions to Wikipedia. North America1000 02:44, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
I have found another lame page
@ N. America , the page MA Rab is a page about Bangladeshi Army general , the page's references are wrong (no similarity with the page) , will you please notice?Farzana zardari (talk) 04:32, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Farzana zardari: After performing some research, I have initiated a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. A. Rab. North America1000 05:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Watch me please..
Hello Northamerica, you would've probably seen some of my works in AfDs. Also, as you knew it, I'm new to this area. I request you to kindly keep an eye on my works and feel free to ping me right away if you find me doing mistakes of any sort. Your compliance is greatly appreciated. Regards --JAaron95 (Talk) 08:12, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Jaaron95: Thanks for your work on Wikipedia. I'm rather busy with other matters, so no guarantees regarding your request above. However, there are people willing to mentor other users. Check out the essay Wikipedia:Mentorship, Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user and Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area. North America1000 08:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello Northamerica1000, I put Tachikawa-ryu up for deletion on the 15th. I have since changed my mind and I would like to withdraw the nomination. Could you tell me how to go about doing this? 76.107.171.90 (talk) 10:36, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Simply add a comment to the discussion stating that you withdraw the nomination, preferably in bold so it is easily seen. North America1000 10:40, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. 76.107.171.90 (talk) 10:41, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Approve Tandoori chicken
I have nominated Tandoori chicken long ago on "Todays articles for improvement". see here. You are most active on that page, so I demand for approval of that nomination. One user is already supported it, no one opposed nomination yet. You also edited said page [6], [7]. Moreoevr, article gets good number of views and that chicken dish is very nice, people should know about it. --Human3015 knock knock • 23:16, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Human3015: Nominations require three approval votes within 3 weeks to move forward, per the processes at WP:TAFI. As of this post, there is only one approval vote so far. North America1000 01:09, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Note
The word "catholic" is not normally applied to Protestants. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.105.85 (talk) 09:02, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. I have restored the change you made at Gustav-Adolf-Werk. North America1000 09:05, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Edible jellyfish
I have just started writing a new article Rhopilema esculentum on a species of jellyfish that is eaten in southeastern Asia and I wondered whether you would care to collaborate on it. I shall be concentrating on its description, distribution and biology, and you could do its nutritional aspects, or what you fancied. It is also used as a folk medicine apparently. If you don't fancy joining me on its creation, I shan't be offended, but I can see from your DYK nominations that you like writing about food. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:38, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Interesting stuff, and nice work expanding the article. I may contribute, but I'm not finding much coverage about the edible aspects of the jellyfish after several searches. North America1000 01:14, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I'll leave it a couple of days before I nominate it for DYK in case you find anything more. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 27, 2015)
A party in celebration of the Chinese Year of the Ox at a restaruant
The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections: Previous selections: Fat • Nightlife • Sport Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
DYK for Lawn game
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:21, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Somehow got a AFD notification for a AFd I put up
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsk! Tsk! Records-really odd-someone apparently instead of doing a 2nd afd for it put one on this article-not sure what to say though! Wgolf (talk) 00:44, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Wgolf: Everything appears to be in order at this time. The AfD template atop the article correctly links to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsk! Tsk! Records (2nd nomination), and I removed the misplaced AfD template that was placed atop the first nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsk! Tsk! Records (diff). North America1000 00:56, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Wgolf: I have also procedurally closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsk! Tsk! Records, in which the previous discussion page was erroneously nominated for deletion. This was mistakenly created using Twinkle, whereby it appears that the nominator used Twinkle on the wrong page. North America1000
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:31, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Deletion review for Misty Edwards
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Misty Edwards. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. The Cross Bearer (talk) 01:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notice. North America1000 08:23, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Help
Please comment on Talk:Addanki#Discussion.--Vin09 (talk) 05:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not sure whether or not I'm going to contribute to the discussion at this time. North America1000 08:24, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, can you check out edits to the above, I don't want to be in violation of 3RR. Thanks Denisarona (talk) 07:19, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Denisarona: It appears that you are reverting vandalism in the form of the blanking of content. As per WP:EDITWAR, "There are certain exemptions to 3RR, such as reverting vandalism or clear violations of the Biographies of living persons policy". North America1000 07:26, 3 July 2015 (UTC)