Content deleted Content added
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Nomoskedasticity/Archives) (bot |
→AN/I: new section |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:How lovely -- a "new" editor. [[User:Nomoskedasticity|Nomoskedasticity]] ([[User talk:Nomoskedasticity#top|talk]]) 12:53, 5 April 2014 (UTC) |
:How lovely -- a "new" editor. [[User:Nomoskedasticity|Nomoskedasticity]] ([[User talk:Nomoskedasticity#top|talk]]) 12:53, 5 April 2014 (UTC) |
||
::Yup! With reinforcements to boot it seems. Thanks for your edits. [[User:Auditguy|Audit Guy]] ([[User talk:Auditguy|talk]]) 13:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC) |
::Yup! With reinforcements to boot it seems. Thanks for your edits. [[User:Auditguy|Audit Guy]] ([[User talk:Auditguy|talk]]) 13:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC) |
||
== AN/I == |
|||
The elision of the primary question posed in an RfC is noted at AN/I [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 19:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:42, 29 April 2014
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Copyvio in Haredi Judaism
It may be a copyvio (or not), but I think it should be discussed, maybe get some opinions before deletion. Editor2020 (talk) 03:25, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Can you explain why you closed this discussion?
You closed Wikipedia:BLPNB#Tor_.28anonymity_network.29. Can you say why? 88.75.168.80 (talk) 12:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- I did say why. See the closing summary. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 13:36, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- "Not a BLP problem." Is that your reason? Could you go into more depth please? You also wrote that in the Kieth Haring thread but did not actually close the discussion. 94.222.101.145 (talk) 18:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Specifically, you appear to be very sure that it is not. I want to know what I am missing. 94.222.101.145 (talk) 18:56, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- My miracle days are over. But have fun storming the castle! Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- I'm being serious. 94.222.101.145 (talk) 07:27, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Can you tell me where to talk about content disputes over misquotes that damage a person's reputation? 92.78.149.81 (talk) 19:15, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Article talk page, perhaps? Nomoskedasticity (talk) 14:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- That's been done. Two editors strongly support material that is factually wrong and damaging to the subjects. Did you read the conflicting sources? 188.103.62.231 (talk) 22:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- Article talk page, perhaps? Nomoskedasticity (talk) 14:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- My miracle days are over. But have fun storming the castle! Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:19, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Hey, not a big deal
But it turns out that unreferenced BLP does not take a section argument, so [1] marks the entire article as unsourced. Just a FYI. Cheers, --j⚛e deckertalk 14:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Basel School of Business
Hi Nomoskedasticity, Could you take a look at Basel School of Business? Any input from you would be appreciated. Thanks! Audit Guy (talk) 10:35, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- How lovely -- a "new" editor. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 12:53, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
AN/I
The elision of the primary question posed in an RfC is noted at AN/I Collect (talk) 19:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)