m Reverted edits by ReGoG Now (talk) to last version by Nlu |
Demonblade (talk | contribs) m Hi |
||
Line 173: | Line 173: | ||
:I appreciate it. I am, however, sometimes a little leery to draw maps (or have others draw them) because a lot of times we're not actually sure of historical boundaries. (And I don't do it personally anyway since I'm terrible, terrible at anything having to do with drawing. :-)) If it is opportune, I'll take you up on your offer. Thanks! --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 23:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC) |
:I appreciate it. I am, however, sometimes a little leery to draw maps (or have others draw them) because a lot of times we're not actually sure of historical boundaries. (And I don't do it personally anyway since I'm terrible, terrible at anything having to do with drawing. :-)) If it is opportune, I'll take you up on your offer. Thanks! --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 23:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
::Incidentally, I think Tibet (Tufan)'s vassal status is a quite a bit more questionable than Goguryeo's (and Baekje's and Silla's), actually. [[Tuyuhun]] was a vassal, but Tuyuhun, even at its prime, did not reach really outside modern [[Qinghai]]. --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 23:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC) |
::Incidentally, I think Tibet (Tufan)'s vassal status is a quite a bit more questionable than Goguryeo's (and Baekje's and Silla's), actually. [[Tuyuhun]] was a vassal, but Tuyuhun, even at its prime, did not reach really outside modern [[Qinghai]]. --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 23:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Hi == |
|||
Hi any chance you can indefinitly block my account? Basically the same person the forced Nobleeagle to quit is harassing me. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Damareinu:He's annoying, kinda fat too]. But to the point please give me the right to vanish. Thanks. [[User:Demonblade|<font style="color:#eee;background:#d22;">''' Demon'''</font>]][[User talk:Demonblade|<font style="color:#f55;background:#000;">'''''blade '''''</font>]] 08:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:52, 9 March 2007
Archives:
|
please
please protect the comfort women page, because I am on the verge of violating the 3rr rule, and the editwar is getting nowhere. Odst 02:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm a little lost. What's the nature of the dispute? I'd advise you to file a RfC, actually, before protection is tried. Unless I'm missing out on something, this doesn't seem to be too bad. --Nlu (talk) 05:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Rfc?????? Odst 02:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
More Guardian Tiger socks: User:LioneartX
Hi Nlu, I always respected you as a zealous sockpuppet fighter since the User:PoolGuy incident. Unfortunately, a similar incident has occured. I'll spare you the details [[1]]. It's just that an editor has continued to create ban-evading socks. (even admit that he is a sock)[[2]]. Anyway I am hoping you get block User:LionheartX (preferably as soon as you can before he spam your talkpage) since he is obviously community banned according to his previous block logs under User:Guardian Tiger Thank you--Certified.Gangsta 18:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'd like to see how BenAveling (talk · contribs) reacts to this. If he doesn't respond within a day or two, let me know. --Nlu (talk) 18:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, Nlu. I've updated Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Goguryeo edit warriors with some 3RR evidence, and LionheartX is on that list. Also, I've added a section on Comfort women below that, and LionheartX is on that list also. Please check for accuracy and update the RFCU if necessary.--Endroit 18:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry but how Ben reacts to this is totally irrelevant. He has campaigned to have him unblocked ever since they first met. In fact he already voiced his support on User talk:BenAveling This is more of an issue of enforcing policy. I always thought such sockpuppets are blocked on sight. Do we have to go through the same drama everytime?? :(--Certified.Gangsta 23:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi Nlu, sorry to bother you. I am an reincarnation of the account User:RevolverOcelotX, but unfortunately I cannot access that account anymore. Contrary to what the above have said, I am not banned The block log on my previous account were wrong. There was no strong consensus for a ban per official policy. Yes, I have used a number of accounts, but never two at the same time [3]. And my original account is not blocked [4]. I am willing to accept the conditions that User:Shimeru stated in the previous ANI threads. I have never denied being a reincarnation of User:RevolverOcelotX and request that Certified.Gangsta stop harassing me on my userpage. I apologize for my previous account-jumping in the past. I want a chance to prove I can contribute.
Here is several threads recently on WP:ANI showing that there isn't strong support for the block or ban per official policy.
- Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive177#Guardian_Tiger_and_the_unblock_template
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive192#User:ApocalypticDestroyer.27s requests a review and a lifting of the permanent_block.
- Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive207#ApocalypticDestroyer.27s_.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.C2.A0.C2.B7_logs.C2.A0.C2.B7_block_user.C2.A0.C2.B7_block_log.29_request_for_a_lifting_of_the_permanent_block.
Thanks, LionheartX 01:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Reappearing by being a sockpuppet is still improper. You should go back to your original account to the extent that you can. I don't know why you say that you "don't have access" to it; you can always have your password e-mailed to you. --Nlu (talk) 02:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry for losing access to my original account due to a loss password, but unfortunately I had never set an email for my original account. In the spirit of forgive and forget and ignore all rules, I want a chance to prove I can contribute positively to wikipedia. LionheartX 02:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- For a rule-violator to invoke WP:IAR is a point that is not well taken, at least by this admin. You are given another chance to prove that you can contribute positively. Use that chance. Meanwhile, I trust that you've learned your lessons over the password that you've set your current account so that in case you lose your password again, you'll have your password e-mailed to you. If this happens again, it will be very difficult for me, or any other admin, to believe you. I am giving you this one chance. Don't make me look foolish for doing it. --Nlu (talk) 02:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've set up an email with my current account. I promise this won't happen again. LionheartX 02:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Nlu, can you block him ASAP?? please??--Certified.Gangsta 02:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- I am still considering it. Since RevolverOcelotX (talk · contribs) hasn't edited for months, I am inclined to block that account regardless. I will probably have a decision tonight. It's more complicated than it appears at first, but still, I am not thrilled with the use of multiple accounts, for sure. --Nlu (talk) 02:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I've made my decision: I blocked RevolverOcelotX indefinitely. As for LionheartX, I am not going to block that account at the time being. However, LionheartX, please be aware that you will be on a very short leash; any further improper behavior -- including any sockpuppetry -- will draw an indefinite block, and I will personally request that a lengthy block be placed on your IP as well. --Nlu (talk) 02:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for your understanding. I promise not to use multiple accounts again from now onwards. LionheartX 02:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Nlu, I don't know what you're doing. Obviously this user will not go back to the Revolver account, he'll just create new ban-evading socks once he is blocked. so blocking that account seems rather irrelevant (that is the reason why it wasnt blocked before) As for a decision by admins, a decision was already made a few months ago and that was community ban which means this user will be block on sight under any account. Many unblock requests were turned down on User talk:Guardian Tiger and the page was protected. Please refer to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive177#Guardian_Tiger_and_the_unblock_template. So the only remaining issue now is policy enforcement, so that's why I want someone with admins tool (like you) to enforce this policy. Please block LionheartX accordingly. Thanks--Certified.Gangsta 02:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- As stated above, I was not community ban. The threads on WP:ANI does not show strong consensus for a ban per official policy. Thanks. LionheartX 02:59, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
There was. Please stop wikilawyering.--Certified.Gangsta 03:05, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- There wasn't. Please refrain from personal attacks. LionheartX 03:08, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
It's the same situation every single time. I'm tired of this. He'll stalk me and spam admins talkpages then admins think I'm the vandal. That is why I said block on sight so we won't have all these useless dramas.--Certified.Gangsta 05:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Please justify your statement with evidence. Nlu, please see this ANI thread and post your comments there: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Ban-Evasion. Thanks. LionheartX 05:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, sorry about spamming of admins' talk pages. It won't happen again. LionheartX 06:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Lion could've utilize the e-mail function when the previous account's talkpage was protected instead of continue sockpuppet abuse.--Certified.Gangsta 07:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- I already raised that, and he already stated that he did not register his e-mail with that last account. I am going to believe him -- once. If it happens again, there will be no further justifications. --Nlu (talk) 07:12, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Regarding Dickhooker's username
It's real. Hooker is my last name, taken from my step father, while Dick = Richard, used for disctinction between the other guys named Richard in the military and work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dickhooker (talk • contribs) 19:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC).
Hello
Hello, could you please delete my talk page and block me for a year (preferably block me indefinitely) with the block log saying 'per user request'. I know about the Right to Vanish, I also know about Wikibreaks. I have made my decision, please do this if possible, or else I'll ask another admin. — Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 06:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's not normal to block per request. If you want to enforce a wiki-break the recommended way is to set up your monobook to log you out as soon as you login. I don't have the reference at hand, but I'm sure it wouldn't be too hard to find. Regards, Ben Aveling 06:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Disenting opions
An excellent summary: [5] I can neither add to it, nor take anything away from it. Regards, Ben Aveling 06:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. Meanwhile, I already blocked Nobleeagle before your note, but I suppose he/she can always e-mail me if he/she wants to return. --Nlu (talk) 07:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I guess it's the equivalent of putting a lock on the fridge door. :-) Thanks again for your input, much appreciated. Cheers, Ben Aveling 07:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
WP:AIV and User:Noobett
The user's last addition was Lankybugger and as you can see (now that you know the article) it was after his/her final warning. I deleted the article and neglected to notice Noobett was on AIV but have now blocked the account. auburnpilot talk 10:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Buffalo, New York
Hi Nlu - I saw that you had put up a "Last Warning" note on the talk page for 24.38.15.122. This person has vandalised the Buffalo page several times since then (continuing to do so all day), and I was wondering if you could do anything about it (or point me in the right direction to ask someone). Perhaps a block or some kind of protection on the article page? Thanks in advance! -- Oaxaca dan 19:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Much obliged!! --Oaxaca dan 19:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello Nlu, I think I have now understand where we disagree for the map. That was out of my mind that Goguryeo was vassal of Tang's China from 619 to 642, and I was just looking on the fact that Goguryeo was not vassal in 649.
Now we have a way to find a solution for this map.
Moreover, I think I will have to delete and rename the maps relate to Tang Taizong. Most of this maps just say "Tang.png" or "Tang dynasty.png" which haven't any sense. With such big periods (618-907) we will have again and again edition wars for those maps if we keep those names.
On commons, I want to rename :
- the map without Gogureyo into => Image:Tang dynasty 649.png
- the map with Gogureyo + Western turks => I think it should be deleted. Or Image:Tang dynasty 642.png (but I don't think it's accurate to say that Western turks and Tarim kingdoms where down in 642)
- A map with Gogureyo(from 619), Eastern Turcks (from 630), Tibet (from 641) => Image:Tang dynasty 641.png
But I think I should recreate a map, that will be better.
I will probably do this within 2 weeks. Yug 21:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Need Maps ?
Hello [again] Nlu.
I just notice you that, if you list clearly
- all geographical informations according to current province's boundaries of China (RPC),
- all historical informations need to draw an historical map (years, main leader)
then I can draw historical map for you.Yug
- I appreciate it. I am, however, sometimes a little leery to draw maps (or have others draw them) because a lot of times we're not actually sure of historical boundaries. (And I don't do it personally anyway since I'm terrible, terrible at anything having to do with drawing. :-)) If it is opportune, I'll take you up on your offer. Thanks! --Nlu (talk) 23:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi
Hi any chance you can indefinitly block my account? Basically the same person the forced Nobleeagle to quit is harassing me. annoying, kinda fat too. But to the point please give me the right to vanish. Thanks. Demonblade 08:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)